{ "dataset": "SafeLegalAI — US legislation on AI in courts, evidence and legal services", "license": "CC BY 4.0; bill text public domain; LegiScan metadata CC BY 4.0 (LegiScan LLC)", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty of any kind. Not legal advice; no lawyer–client relationship. SafeLegalAI (published by Cognesio LLP) records findings made by courts, regulators and vendors' own published pages; the linked official documents are the record. Third-party names and marks identify their owners' products or bodies and imply no affiliation or endorsement. Terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation", "repository": "https://github.com/SafeLegalAI/us-ai-courts-legislation", "huggingface": "https://huggingface.co/datasets/safelegalaidata/us-ai-courts-legislation", "generated": "2026-09-08T07:17:56.286Z", "version": "0.1.3", "count": 41, "bills": [ { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ca-2025-sb-574", "bill_number": "SB 574", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "SECTION 1. Section 6068.1 is added to the Business and Professions Code, to read: 6068.1. (a) (1) Nothing in this section shall be construed to abrogate an attorney's duty to exercise reasonable competence and diligence in the practice of law. (2) An attorney shall not delegate the practice of law to generative artificial intelligence. (3) An attorney who uses generative artificial intelligence to assist in the practice of law shall do all of the following: (A) Not enter confidential, personal identifying, and other nonpublic information into a generative artificial intelligence system for which access to confidential, personal identifying, or other nonpublic information the attorney inputs into the system is not restricted to the attorney and persons authorized by the attorney under obligations to protect the confidentiality of the information. (B) Take reasonable steps to do both of the following: (i) Verify the accuracy of generative artificial intelligence outputs, including, but not limited to, the accuracy of all case and statutory citations. (ii) Correct any erroneous or hallucinated output in any material used by the attorney. (C) Disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence to the court for all documents submitted to the court and consider whether to disclose the use of generative artificial intelligence if it is used to create content provided to the public.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "CA", "lane": [ "attorney-ai-use", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "Enrolled 09/04/26 (status page); last history entry 08/31/26: Assembly amendments concurred in (Ayes 39. Noes 0.); ordered to engrossing and enrolling. Not yet shown as presented to the Governor.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": "Enrolled Date 09/04/26 per the LegInfo status page; the history page showed no \"presented to the Governor\" entry when read on 2026-09-07. Once presented, Cal. Const. art. IV §10(b)(2) gives the Governor until 30 September 2026. Excerpt extended to §6068.1(a) from the enrolled text; sponsor corrected from the enrolled text header (Umberg; Macedo coauthor).", "operative_sections": [ "B&P Code §6068.1(a)(2): an attorney shall not delegate the practice of law to generative artificial intelligence.", "B&P Code §6068.1(a)(3)(A): no confidential, personal identifying or other nonpublic information may be entered into a generative AI system unless access to it is restricted to the attorney and authorised persons bound to confidentiality.", "B&P Code §6068.1(a)(3)(B): reasonable steps to verify the accuracy of generative AI outputs, including all case and statutory citations, and to correct erroneous or hallucinated output in any material used.", "B&P Code §6068.1(a)(3)(C): disclose generative AI use to the court for all documents submitted; CCP §128.7 amended so no filed paper may contain citations the responsible attorney has not personally verified; CCP §§180 and 1282.1 added — arbitrators may not delegate decision-making to generative AI or rely on AI-generated information outside the record without prior disclosure.", "The bill directs the Judicial Council to revisit its standard of judicial administration on generative AI." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB574", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Thomas Umberg", "Asm. Alexandra Macedo (coauthor)" ], "status": "enrolled", "status_date": "2026-09-04", "status_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB574", "summary": "California SB 574 requires attorneys using generative AI in practice to protect confidential information, verify generated outputs including every citation, correct errors before use, and disclose AI use to the court. It bars arbitrators from delegating decision-making to generative AI and directs Judicial Council review. Passed both houses 31 August 2026; enrolled 4 September 2026.", "text_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB574", "title": "Attorneys, arbitrators, judicial officers, and alternative dispute resolution providers", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2025-sb-574", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2025-sb-574" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2026-s-10675", "bill_number": "S10675", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "An operator of a chatbot shall not knowingly permit such chatbot to impersonate an actual or fictitious practitioner of a covered profession in a manner that, if done by a natural person ... would violate the provisions of article fifteen of the judiciary law prohibiting the practice or appearance as an attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered under such article. ... An operator shall not waive or disclaim liability under this section by notifying consumers that they are interacting with a non-human chatbot system.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "legal-services-upl" ], "last_action": "REFERRED TO RULES", "lead_source": [ "state legislature keyword search" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(1)(d): covered professions include those governed by Judiciary Law article 15.", "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(2)(a): chatbot operators may not knowingly permit impersonation of attorneys or other covered professionals.", "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(2)(c): operators may not waive or disclaim liability merely by notifying users the chatbot is non-human." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10675", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Gonzalez" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-08-05", "status_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10675", "summary": "New York S10675 is a later Senate chatbot-liability bill covering licensed or certified professions, including attorneys under Judiciary Law article 15. It prohibits operators from knowingly allowing chatbots to impersonate attorneys or other covered practitioners and preserves liability despite notices. The bill was referred to Rules on August 5, 2026.", "text_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10675", "title": "Liability for chatbot responses", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2026-s-10675", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2026-s-10675" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2026-s-9794", "bill_number": "S09794", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Rule 2107. (a) Certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence. Any paper or file served that was drafted with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence must attach to the filing a separate affidavit disclosing such use and certifying that a human being has reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate. ... if required by rule 2107, a disclosure of the use of generative artificial intelligence in the drafting of the brief and certification that the content therein was reviewed and verified by a human.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "attorney-ai-use", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "COMMITTED TO RULES", "lead_source": [ "state legislature keyword search" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "CPLR Rule 2107(a): papers drafted with generative AI must attach an affidavit disclosing use and certifying human review and verification.", "CPLR Rule 5528(a)(6): appellate briefs must include Rule 2107 AI disclosure and human-review certification when required." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S09794", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Sepulveda" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-06-05", "status_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S09794", "summary": "New York S09794 renews a generative-AI civil filing certification proposal. Papers drafted with AI assistance would need a separate affidavit disclosing use and certifying human review of source material and generated accuracy, with parallel appellate-brief disclosure language. The Senate committed the bill to Rules on June 5, 2026.", "text_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S09794", "title": "Certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2026-s-9794", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2026-s-9794" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2025-s-7263", "bill_number": "S07263", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "An operator of a chatbot shall not knowingly permit such chatbot to impersonate an actual or fictitious practitioner of a covered profession in a manner that, if done by a natural person ... would violate the provisions of article fifteen of the judiciary law prohibiting the practice or appearance as an attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered under such article. ... An operator shall not waive or disclaim liability under this section by notifying consumers that they are interacting with a non-human chatbot system.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "legal-services-upl" ], "last_action": "COMMITTED TO RULES", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(1)(d): covered professions include those governed by Judiciary Law article 15.", "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(2)(a): chatbot operators may not knowingly permit impersonation of attorneys or other covered professionals.", "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(2)(c): operators may not waive or disclaim liability merely by notifying users the chatbot is non-human." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S07263", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Gonzalez" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-06-05", "status_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S07263", "summary": "New York S07263A is the Senate companion regulating chatbot impersonation of covered professionals, including unauthorized practice or appearance as an attorney under Judiciary Law article 15. It bars operators from knowingly permitting such impersonation and from disclaiming liability through chatbot notices. The Senate committed it to Rules on June 5, 2026.", "text_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S07263", "title": "Liability for chatbot responses", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-s-7263", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-s-7263" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2025-a-7172", "bill_number": "A07172", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "The protocol shall address ... AI systems and FRT being used for investigative purposes, including but not limited to data analysis, pattern recognition, facial recognition, and predictive analytics; AI systems and FRT used to assist in identifying potential suspects, uncovering evidence, and generating investigative leads; requiring law enforcement agencies that utilize AI systems and FRT to implement transparency measures, including maintaining records of AI-generated outputs and the parameters used by the AI system. ... The results of these audits shall be publicly accessible and disclosed in any case where FRT evidence is used.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "police-reports-criminal", "evidence" ], "last_action": "reported", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Exec. Law §837(25): DCJS must promulgate a protocol for law enforcement AI and facial-recognition use in criminal investigations.", "Exec. Law §837(25)(a)(iii): agencies must keep records of AI-generated outputs and parameters for audit and review.", "Exec. Law §837(25)(a)(iv): independent FRT audits must be publicly accessible and disclosed in any case where FRT evidence is used." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A07172&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Bichotte Hermelyn" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-06-03", "status_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A07172&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "summary": "New York A07172B directs the Division of Criminal Justice Services to issue a written protocol for law enforcement AI and facial-recognition use in criminal investigations. The protocol must require transparency records, independent audits, public audit results, and disclosure in any case where FRT evidence is used. It was reported June 3, 2026.", "text_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A07172&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "title": "Division of Criminal Justice Services: law enforcement AI protocol", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-7172", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-7172" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2025-a-6545", "bill_number": "A06545", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "An operator of a chatbot shall not knowingly permit such chatbot to impersonate an actual or fictitious practitioner of a covered profession in a manner that, if done by a natural person ... would violate the provisions of article fifteen of the judiciary law prohibiting the practice or appearance as an attorney-at-law without being admitted and registered under such article. ... An operator shall not waive or disclaim liability under this section by notifying consumers that they are interacting with a non-human chatbot system.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "legal-services-upl" ], "last_action": "reported", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(1)(d): covered professions include those governed by Judiciary Law article 15.", "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(2)(a): chatbot operators may not knowingly permit impersonation of attorneys or other covered professionals.", "Gen. Bus. Law §390-f(2)(c): operators may not waive or disclaim liability merely by notifying users the chatbot is non-human." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A06545&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Zaccaro" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-06-01", "status_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A06545&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "summary": "New York A06545C regulates chatbot impersonation of licensed professionals, including attorneys governed by Judiciary Law article 15. Operators may not knowingly permit a chatbot to impersonate a practitioner or practice as an attorney without admission and registration, and cannot disclaim liability by a chatbot notice. It was reported June 1, 2026.", "text_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A06545&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "title": "Liability for chatbot responses", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-6545", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-6545" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2026-s-10574", "bill_number": "S10574", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "The protocol shall address ... AI systems and FRT being used for investigative purposes, including but not limited to data analysis, pattern recognition, facial recognition, and predictive analytics; AI systems and FRT used to assist in identifying potential suspects, uncovering evidence, and generating investigative leads; requiring law enforcement agencies that utilize AI systems and FRT to implement transparency measures, including maintaining records of AI-generated outputs and the parameters used by the AI system. ... The results of these audits shall be publicly accessible and disclosed in any case where FRT evidence is used.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "police-reports-criminal", "evidence" ], "last_action": "REFERRED TO CODES", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Exec. Law §837(25): DCJS must promulgate a protocol for law enforcement AI and facial-recognition use in criminal investigations.", "Exec. Law §837(25)(a)(iii): agencies must keep records of AI-generated outputs and parameters for audit and review.", "Exec. Law §837(25)(a)(iv): independent FRT audits must be publicly accessible and disclosed in any case where FRT evidence is used." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10574", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Sanders" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-05-26", "status_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10574", "summary": "New York S10574 is the Senate counterpart for a DCJS law enforcement AI and facial-recognition protocol. It requires transparency records of AI outputs and parameters, independent FRT audits, public audit results, and disclosure in cases where FRT evidence is used. The Senate referred the bill to Codes on May 26, 2026.", "text_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10574", "title": "Division of Criminal Justice Services: law enforcement AI protocol", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2026-s-10574", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2026-s-10574" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2026-s-10425", "bill_number": "S10425", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Covered AI means any AI used to aid a law enforcement investigation, including by generating a lead for further investigation or corroboration, as well as generative AI technologies used to write or materially aid in writing police reports or other records relating to a criminal investigation. ... Any use of covered AI in a criminal investigation shall be disclosed in a police report filed for that investigation. ... A police report or other law enforcement record generated during a criminal investigation that was created in whole or in part by using generative AI shall include a disclaimer that the report or record contains content generated by artificial intelligence.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "REFERRED TO CODES", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Exec. Law §837-ww(1)(b): covered AI includes AI used for investigative leads and generative AI used to write police reports or criminal-investigation records.", "Exec. Law §837-ww(3)(a): covered-AI use in a criminal investigation must be disclosed in the police report and to prosecutors and represented individuals.", "Exec. Law §837-ww(3)(b): AI-generated criminal-investigation reports must include a disclaimer, identify AI-generated content where feasible, and include author certification." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10425", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Gonzalez" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-05-15", "status_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10425", "summary": "New York S10425 is the Senate companion requiring public inventories and policies for covered AI used in criminal investigations. It covers AI investigative leads and generative AI used to write police reports, requires disclosure in police reports and to prosecutors, and mandates AI disclaimers and author certification. It was referred May 15, 2026.", "text_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S10425", "title": "Use of artificial intelligence by policing agencies", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2026-s-10425", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2026-s-10425" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "us-119-s-4154", "bill_number": "S. 4154", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "The purpose of this Act is to provide Congress with—(1) an analysis of any issues or benefits related to the use of AI speech-to-text technology and automatic speech recognition technology in the United States judicial system; (2) a review of the use of AI speech-to-text technology and automatic speech recognition technology in the United States judicial system; and (3) any recommendations based on the analysis and review. ... The task force shall submit ... a final report on ... whether a court record created or modified by AI speech-to-text technology or automatic speech recognition technology affects the quality or accuracy of a transcription of a legal proceeding.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "US", "lane": [ "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "Introduced; read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "§2(a): Congress would receive analysis, review, and recommendations on AI speech-to-text and automatic speech recognition in the U.S. judicial system.", "§2(b): the Attorney General, through NIJ, must establish the AI Research and Oversight in Courts Task Force.", "§2(e): the task force final report must address AI-created or modified court records and effects on legal-proceeding transcripts." ], "session": "119th Congress", "source_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-119s4154is", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Roger Wicker", "Sen. Peter Welch" ], "status": "introduced", "status_date": "2026-03-19", "status_url": "https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4154", "summary": "Federal S. 4154 is the Senate companion to the Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act. It establishes a task force to review AI speech-to-text and automatic speech-recognition technology in the U.S. judicial system and report on court records, accessibility, accuracy, privacy, civil liberties, and costs. It was introduced March 19, 2026.", "text_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-119s4154is", "title": "Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act of 2026", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/us-119-s-4154", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/us-119-s-4154" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "us-119-hr-7997", "bill_number": "H.R. 7997", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "The purpose of this Act is to provide Congress with—(1) an analysis of any issues or benefits related to the use of AI speech-to-text technology and automatic speech recognition technology in the United States judicial system; (2) a review of the use of AI speech-to-text technology and automatic speech recognition technology in the United States judicial system; and (3) any recommendations based on the analysis and review. ... The task force shall submit ... a final report on ... whether a court record created or modified by AI speech-to-text technology or automatic speech recognition technology affects the quality or accuracy of a transcription of a legal proceeding.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "US", "lane": [ "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "Introduced; referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "§2(a): Congress would receive analysis, review, and recommendations on AI speech-to-text and automatic speech recognition in the U.S. judicial system.", "§2(b): the Attorney General, through NIJ, must establish the AI Research and Oversight in Courts Task Force.", "§2(e): the task force final report must address AI-created or modified court records and effects on legal-proceeding transcripts." ], "session": "119th Congress", "source_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-119hr7997ih", "sponsors": [ "Rep. Harriet Hageman", "Rep. Pete Stauber" ], "status": "introduced", "status_date": "2026-03-19", "status_url": "https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7997", "summary": "Federal H.R. 7997 would create an AI Research and Oversight in Courts Task Force through the Attorney General and National Institute of Justice. The task force studies AI speech-to-text and automatic speech recognition in the federal judicial system and reports on court records, accuracy, privacy, and costs. It was introduced March 19, 2026.", "text_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-119hr7997ih", "title": "Research and Oversight of AI in Courts Act of 2026", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/us-119-hr-7997", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/us-119-hr-7997" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2025-a-9253", "bill_number": "A09253", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Covered AI means any AI used to aid a law enforcement investigation, including by generating a lead for further investigation or corroboration, as well as generative AI technologies used to write or materially aid in writing police reports or other records relating to a criminal investigation. ... Any use of covered AI in a criminal investigation shall be disclosed in a police report filed for that investigation. ... A police report or other law enforcement record generated during a criminal investigation that was created in whole or in part by using generative AI shall include a disclaimer that the report or record contains content generated by artificial intelligence.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "amend and recommit to codes", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Exec. Law §837-ww(1)(b): covered AI includes AI used for investigative leads and generative AI used to write police reports or criminal-investigation records.", "Exec. Law §837-ww(3)(a): covered-AI use in a criminal investigation must be disclosed in the police report and to prosecutors and represented individuals.", "Exec. Law §837-ww(3)(b): AI-generated criminal-investigation reports must include a disclaimer, identify AI-generated content where feasible, and include author certification." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A09253&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Rosenthal" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-03-17", "status_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A09253&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "summary": "New York A09253A requires policing agencies to inventory and disclose covered AI used in criminal investigations, including generative AI that writes police reports. It requires police-report disclosure to prosecutors and represented individuals and AI-generated report disclaimers, content identification, certification, draft retention, and audit trails. It was amended March 17, 2026.", "text_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A09253&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "title": "Use of artificial intelligence by policing agencies", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-9253", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-9253" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ca-2025-sb-11", "bill_number": "SB 11", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "1425. (a) By no later than January 1, 2027, the Judicial Council shall review the impact of artificial intelligence on the admissibility of proffered evidence in court proceedings and develop any necessary rules of court to assist courts in assessing claims that proffered evidence has been generated by or manipulated by artificial intelligence and determining whether such evidence is admissible.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "CA", "lane": [ "evidence", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "Veto sustained.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Evid. Code §1425(a): Judicial Council must review AI’s impact on admissibility and develop court rules for AI-generated or manipulated evidence.", "Penal Code ch. 9 definitions: defines AI and digital replica for related criminal provisions." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB11", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Rubio" ], "status": "veto-sustained", "status_date": "2026-03-02", "status_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB11", "summary": "California SB 11 would have required the Judicial Council to review how artificial intelligence affects admissibility of evidence and develop rules of court for claims that evidence was generated or manipulated by AI. The Governor vetoed the bill in 2025, and the veto was sustained on March 2, 2026.", "text_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB11", "title": "Artificial intelligence technology", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2025-sb-11", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2025-sb-11" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2025-a-8546", "bill_number": "A08546", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Rule 2107. (a) Certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence. Any paper or file served that was drafted with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence must attach to the filing a separate affidavit disclosing such use and certifying that a human being has reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate. ... if required by rule 2107, a disclosure of the use of generative artificial intelligence in the drafting of the brief and certification that the content therein was reviewed and verified by a human.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "attorney-ai-use", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "referred to judiciary", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "CPLR Rule 2107(a): papers drafted with generative AI must attach an affidavit disclosing use and certifying human review and verification.", "CPLR Rule 5528(a)(6): appellate briefs must include Rule 2107 AI disclosure and human-review certification when required." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A08546&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Lavine" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-01-07", "status_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A08546&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "summary": "New York A08546 would require civil papers drafted with generative AI assistance to attach an affidavit disclosing that use and certifying human review of source material and generated accuracy. It also adds appellate-brief disclosure and certification language. The Assembly referred the bill to Judiciary on January 7, 2026.", "text_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A08546&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "title": "Certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-8546", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-8546" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2025-a-1338", "bill_number": "A01338", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Evidence created, in whole or in part, by artificial intelligence shall not be received into evidence in a criminal proceeding unless the evidence is substantially supported by independent and admissible evidence and the proponent of the evidence establishes the reliability and accuracy of the specific use of the artificial intelligence in creating the evidence. Evidence processed, in whole or in part, by artificial intelligence shall not be received into evidence in a criminal proceeding unless the proponent of the evidence establishes the reliability and accuracy of the specific use of the artificial intelligence in processing the evidence.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "evidence" ], "last_action": "referred to codes", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Crim. Proc. Law §60.80(1): AI-created evidence is inadmissible in criminal proceedings unless supported by independent admissible evidence and reliability is established.", "Crim. Proc. Law §60.80(2): AI-processed evidence is inadmissible unless the proponent establishes reliability and accuracy of that AI use." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A01338&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Vanel" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2026-01-07", "status_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A01338&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "summary": "New York A01338 renews proposed criminal-procedure rules for evidence created or processed by artificial intelligence. The bill requires independent admissible support and specific reliability showings before AI-created or AI-processed evidence can be received in criminal proceedings. The Assembly referred it to Codes on January 7, 2026.", "text_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2025&bn=A01338&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "title": "Artificial intelligence evidence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-1338", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-a-1338" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "md-2025-sb-655", "bill_number": "SB 655", "effective_date": "2025-07-01", "excerpt": "(B) THERE IS AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EVIDENCE CLINIC PILOT PROGRAM IN THE OFFICE. (C) (1) THE PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM IS TO PROVIDE EXPERTISE IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS AND THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE FORM OF EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE AUTHENTICITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE THAT A COURT DETERMINES MAY HAVE BEEN CREATED OR ALTERED USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. (2) THE PROGRAM SHALL ENGAGE ... TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONALS ... TO DEVELOP EXPERT WITNESS RESOURCES FOR COURTS TO USE IN CASES IMPLICATING THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "MD", "lane": [ "evidence", "courts-judiciary", "legal-aid-a2j" ], "last_action": "Became law per Maryland Constitution, Chapter 17 of 2025 Special Session.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Courts & Jud. Proc. §13-101.2(B): establishes an Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program in the Administrative Office of the Courts.", "Courts & Jud. Proc. §13-101.2(C)(1): the program provides expert testimony on authenticity of electronic evidence that may have been AI-created or altered.", "Courts & Jud. Proc. §13-101.2(C)(3): the program prioritizes civil cases with unrepresented parties or limited access to expert testimony." ], "session": "2025 Regular/Special", "source_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/sb0655?ys=2025RS", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Charles Sydnor" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2025-12-16", "status_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/sb0655?ys=2025RS", "summary": "Maryland SB 655 establishes an Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program in the Administrative Office of the Courts. The clinic supplies AI expertise and expert testimony on electronic evidence that courts determine may have been created or altered using AI, prioritizing civil cases with limited representation. It became law December 16, 2025.", "text_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2025RS/Chapters_noln/Ch_17_sb0655E.pdf", "title": "Courts - Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program - Establishment", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/md-2025-sb-655", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/md-2025-sb-655" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ca-2025-ab-316", "bill_number": "AB 316", "effective_date": "2026-01-01", "excerpt": "1714.46. (b) In an action against a defendant who developed, modified, or used artificial intelligence that is alleged to have caused a harm to the plaintiff, it shall not be a defense, and the defendant may not assert, that the artificial intelligence autonomously caused the harm to the plaintiff.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "CA", "lane": [ "evidence" ], "last_action": "Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 672, Statutes of 2025.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "FPF State of State AI 2025 supplemental PDF" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Civ. Code §1714.46(b): a defendant that developed, modified, or used AI may not assert that AI autonomously caused the harm.", "Civ. Code §1714.46(c): other affirmative defenses and comparative-fault evidence remain available." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB316", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Bauer-Kahan" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2025-10-13", "status_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB316", "summary": "California AB 316 creates a civil-liability evidence rule for AI-related harm. In an action alleging harm caused by a defendant’s development, modification, or use of AI, the defendant may not assert that AI acted autonomously, while other defenses remain available. The bill was chaptered on October 13, 2025.", "text_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB316", "title": "Artificial intelligence: defenses", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2025-ab-316", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2025-ab-316" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ca-2025-sb-524", "bill_number": "SB 524", "effective_date": "2026-01-01", "excerpt": "13663. (a) Each law enforcement agency shall maintain a policy to require an official report ... that is generated using artificial intelligence either fully or partially to contain ... identify every specific artificial intelligence program used ... and prominently state the following: “This report was written either fully or in part using artificial intelligence.” (2) The signature ... verifying that they reviewed the contents of that report and that the facts contained in the official report are true and correct.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "CA", "lane": [ "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 587, Statutes of 2025.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Penal Code §13663(a): AI-generated police reports must disclose AI use on each page or in the body.", "Penal Code §13663(a)(2): the officer or agency member must sign verifying review and factual accuracy.", "Penal Code §13663(b): agencies must retain initial AI-generated drafts when official reports use AI." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB524", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Richardson" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2025-10-10", "status_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB524", "summary": "California SB 524 requires law enforcement agencies to maintain policies for official reports generated fully or partly by AI. Reports must identify the AI program, state that AI wrote all or part of the report, and include the preparer’s verification. The bill was chaptered on October 10, 2025.", "text_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260SB524", "title": "Law enforcement agencies: artificial intelligence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2025-sb-524", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2025-sb-524" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "la-2025-hb-178", "bill_number": "HB 178", "effective_date": "2025-08-01", "excerpt": "An attorney shall not knowingly encourage or produce false evidence, including evidence that is artificially generated or altered by any means ... If the court determines that evidence has been falsified, including having been generated by artificial intelligence or altered by any means, the party shall disclose this fact in accordance with Article 371. ... It is the intent of the legislature that the term artificial intelligence is broad and encompasses the suspected use of deepfakes.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "LA", "lane": [ "evidence", "attorney-ai-use" ], "last_action": "Signed by the Governor as Act No. 250.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": "Louisiana live host had intermittent DNS failures during final pass; official enrolled/Act PDF was read from saved primary copy.", "operative_sections": [ "Code Civ. Proc. art. 371(C): attorneys must not knowingly encourage or produce false evidence, including artificially generated or altered evidence.", "Code Civ. Proc. art. 1551: pretrial procedures address evidence alleged to be falsified, including generated by AI or altered by any means.", "Section 5: legislative intent states artificial intelligence is broad and includes suspected deepfakes." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/BillInfo.aspx?i=248099", "sponsors": [ "Rep. Muscarello" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2025-06-17", "status_url": "https://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/BillInfo.aspx?i=248099", "summary": "Louisiana HB 178, enacted as Act 250, amends civil procedure on false evidence and artificial generation or alteration. It bars attorneys from knowingly encouraging or producing such evidence and creates procedures for disclosure and pretrial handling of AI-generated or altered evidence. The Governor signed it on June 17, 2025.", "text_url": "https://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1425558", "title": "Civil procedure: false or artificially generated evidence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/la-2025-hb-178", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/la-2025-hb-178" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2025-s-2698", "bill_number": "S02698", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Rule 2107. (a) Certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence. Any paper or file served that was drafted with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence must attach to the filing a separate affidavit disclosing such use and certifying that a human being has reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate. ... if required by rule 2107, a disclosure of the use of generative artificial intelligence in the drafting of the brief and certification that the content therein was reviewed and verified by a human.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "attorney-ai-use", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "COMMITTED TO RULES", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "CPLR Rule 2107(a): papers drafted with generative AI must attach an affidavit disclosing use and certifying human review and verification.", "CPLR Rule 5528(a)(6): appellate briefs must include Rule 2107 AI disclosure and human-review certification when required." ], "session": "2025-2026", "source_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S02698", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Hoylman-Sigal" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2025-06-13", "status_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S02698", "summary": "New York S02698 would require disclosure and certification for civil-action papers drafted with generative AI assistance and for covered appellate briefs. The certification requires human review and verification of AI-generated content. The Senate committed the bill to Rules on June 13, 2025.", "text_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2025/S02698", "title": "Certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-s-2698", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2025-s-2698" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "la-2025-hr-272", "bill_number": "HR 272", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "BE IT RESOLVED that the Louisiana Judicial Council ... does hereby direct the Louisiana Judicial Council to conduct a study on court reporting including ... An evaluation of the current use of digital court reporting in the courts of this state ... An analysis of the use of digital court reporting in other states and the extent to which the digital process and artificial intelligence assisted transcription is utilized for the production of transcripts.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "LA", "lane": [ "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "Taken by the Clerk and presented to the Secretary of State in accordance with House Rules.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": "Louisiana live host had intermittent DNS failures during final pass; official enrolled PDF was read from saved primary copy.", "operative_sections": [ "HR 272 resolved clause: directs the Louisiana Judicial Council to study court reporter per-page transcription rates and digital court reporting.", "HR 272 study item (2): evaluates current use of digital court reporting in Louisiana courts including cost, access, accuracy, and effectiveness.", "HR 272 study item (3): analyzes other states’ use of digital processes and AI-assisted transcription for transcript production." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.aspx?s=25rs&b=HR272", "sponsors": [ "Rep. Muscarello" ], "status": "enrolled", "status_date": "2025-06-11", "status_url": "https://www.legis.la.gov/legis/BillInfo.aspx?s=25rs&b=HR272", "summary": "Louisiana HR 272 directs the Louisiana Judicial Council to study court reporter transcription rates and digital court reporting as an alternative to traditional reporting. The study specifically includes artificial-intelligence-assisted transcription for transcript production and recommendations on court reporting laws. The resolution was enrolled and presented June 11, 2025.", "text_url": "https://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/ViewDocument.aspx?d=1424176", "title": "Courts and court reporters: Judicial Council digital court reporting study", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/la-2025-hr-272", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/la-2025-hr-272" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "md-2025-hb-966", "bill_number": "HB 966", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "(B) THERE IS AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE EVIDENCE CLINIC PILOT PROGRAM IN THE OFFICE. (C) (1) THE PURPOSE OF THE PROGRAM IS TO PROVIDE EXPERTISE IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TO THE CIRCUIT COURTS AND THE DISTRICT COURT IN THE FORM OF EXPERT TESTIMONY ON THE AUTHENTICITY OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE THAT A COURT DETERMINES MAY HAVE BEEN CREATED OR ALTERED USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. (2) THE PROGRAM SHALL ENGAGE ... TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONALS ... TO DEVELOP EXPERT WITNESS RESOURCES FOR COURTS TO USE IN CASES IMPLICATING THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "MD", "lane": [ "evidence", "courts-judiciary", "legal-aid-a2j" ], "last_action": "Favorable Report by Judicial Proceedings; Withdrawn.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Courts & Jud. Proc. §13-101.2(B): establishes an Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program in the Administrative Office of the Courts.", "Courts & Jud. Proc. §13-101.2(C)(1): the program provides expert testimony on authenticity of electronic evidence that may have been AI-created or altered.", "Courts & Jud. Proc. §13-101.2(C)(3): the program prioritizes civil cases with unrepresented parties or limited access to expert testimony." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/hb0966?ys=2025RS", "sponsors": [ "Del. Cardin" ], "status": "died", "status_date": "2025-04-07", "status_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/hb0966?ys=2025RS", "summary": "Maryland HB 966 is the House version of the Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program. It would place AI expertise in the Administrative Office of the Courts for expert testimony on electronic evidence possibly created or altered with AI and prioritize unrepresented civil litigants. The bill failed after Senate action on April 7, 2025.", "text_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2025RS/bills/hb/hb0966f.pdf", "title": "Courts - Artificial Intelligence Evidence Clinic Pilot Program - Establishment", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/md-2025-hb-966", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/md-2025-hb-966" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "va-2026-hb-2692", "bill_number": "HB 2692", "effective_date": "2025-07-01", "excerpt": "A law-enforcement officer shall be prohibited from knowingly and intentionally making false statements about any known material fact, including by use of inauthentic replica documents, prior to or during a custodial interrogation of a child ... “inauthentic replica documents” means any documents, including computer-generated documents, created by any means, including artificial intelligence ... If a law-enforcement officer knowingly violates ... any statements made by such child shall be inadmissible in any delinquency proceeding or criminal proceeding.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "VA", "lane": [ "evidence", "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "Enacted, Chapter 669 (Effective 07/01/25).", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Va. Code §16.1-247.1(C): law-enforcement officers may not knowingly use false statements or inauthentic replica documents in child interrogations.", "Va. Code §16.1-247.1(C): inauthentic replica documents include AI-created documents with false statements or material misrepresentations.", "Va. Code §16.1-247.1(D): violating statements are inadmissible unless the Commonwealth proves knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver." ], "session": "2026 Regular", "source_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB2692", "sponsors": [ "Del. Clark" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2025-04-02", "status_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB2692", "summary": "Virginia HB 2692 bars law enforcement from using false statements or inauthentic replica documents, including AI-created documents, to secure a child’s cooperation, confession, or conviction in custodial interrogations. Violations can make the child’s statements inadmissible in delinquency or criminal proceedings. The bill was enacted April 2, 2025.", "text_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB2692/text/CHAP0669", "title": "Custodial interrogations; false statements to a child; inauthentic replica documents", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/va-2026-hb-2692", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/va-2026-hb-2692" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "va-2025-hb-1642", "bill_number": "HB 1642", "effective_date": "2025-07-01", "excerpt": "All decisions related to the pre-trial detention or release, prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, probation, parole, correctional supervision, or rehabilitation of criminal offenders shall be made by the judicial officer or other person charged with making such decision. No such decision shall be made without the involvement of a human decision-maker. The use of any recommendation or prediction from an artificial intelligence-based tool shall be subject to any challenge or objection permitted by law.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "VA", "lane": [ "courts-judiciary", "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "Enacted, Chapter 637 (Effective 07/01/25).", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Va. Code §19.2-11.14(A): defines AI-based tools as machine-based systems or algorithms that generate recommendations or predictions.", "Va. Code §19.2-11.14(B): criminal-justice decisions remain with a judicial officer or other human decision-maker.", "Va. Code §19.2-11.14(B): AI recommendations or predictions are subject to challenges or objections permitted by law." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB1642", "sponsors": [ "Del. C.E. Cliff Hayes, Jr." ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2025-04-02", "status_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB1642", "summary": "Virginia HB 1642 adds a criminal-procedure chapter on AI-based tools. Decisions on pretrial detention or release, prosecution, adjudication, sentencing, probation, parole, correctional supervision, or rehabilitation must involve a human decision-maker, and AI recommendations remain challengeable. The bill was enacted April 2, 2025.", "text_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB1642/text/CHAP0637", "title": "Artificial intelligence-based tool; definition, use of tool", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/va-2025-hb-1642", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/va-2025-hb-1642" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ut-2025-sb-226", "bill_number": "SB 226", "effective_date": "2025-05-07", "excerpt": "13-75-103. Required disclosures. ... An individual providing services in a regulated occupation shall: (a) prominently disclose when an individual receiving services is interacting with generative artificial intelligence in the provision of regulated services if the use of generative artificial intelligence constitutes a high-risk artificial intelligence interaction; and (b) comply with all requirements of the regulated occupation when providing services through generative artificial intelligence.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "UT", "lane": [ "legal-services-upl" ], "last_action": "Governor Signed.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "FPF State of State AI 2025 supplemental PDF" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Utah Code §13-75-103(2): individuals providing services in regulated occupations must disclose high-risk generative-AI interactions.", "Utah Code §13-75-103(2)(b): regulated-occupation providers must comply with all occupation requirements when providing services through generative AI.", "Utah Code §13-75-103(3): required disclosures must be verbal at the start of oral interactions and written before written interactions." ], "session": "2025 General", "source_url": "https://le.utah.gov/~2025/bills/static/SB0226.html", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Kirk A. Cullimore", "Rep. Jefferson Moss" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2025-03-27", "status_url": "https://le.utah.gov/~2025/bills/static/SB0226.html", "summary": "Utah SB 226 amends the AI Policy Act for consumer transactions and regulated services. In regulated occupations, including licensed professional services, providers must prominently disclose high-risk generative-AI interactions and comply with all occupation requirements when providing services through generative AI. The Governor signed it March 27, 2025.", "text_url": "https://le.utah.gov/~2025/bills/static/SB0226.html", "title": "Artificial Intelligence Consumer Protection Amendments", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ut-2025-sb-226", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ut-2025-sb-226" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ri-2025-s-627", "bill_number": "S 0627", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Consequential decision means any decision or judgment that has a legal, material or similarly significant effect on a consumer with respect to ... The provision or denial, or terms and conditions, of: (A) Financial lending or credit services; (B) Housing or lodging ... (C) Insurance; or (D) Legal services. ... High-risk artificial intelligence system means any artificial intelligence system that, when deployed, makes, or is a substantial factor in making, a consequential decision.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "RI", "lane": [ "legal-services-upl" ], "last_action": "Introduced and referred to Senate Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Technology.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": "Official bill text page supplied introduction/referral but no separate status page was retrievable in this pass.", "operative_sections": [ "R.I. Gen. Laws §6-61-2(3): consequential decisions include provision, denial, terms, or conditions of legal services.", "R.I. Gen. Laws §6-61-2(9): high-risk AI systems include systems that make or substantially factor into consequential decisions.", "R.I. Gen. Laws ch. 6-61: developers, integrators, and deployers of high-risk AI systems would owe risk-management and anti-discrimination duties." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/BillText/BillText25/SenateText25/S0627.pdf", "sponsors": [ "Sen. DiPalma", "Sen. Gu", "Sen. Burke", "Sen. Paolino", "Sen. Urso", "Sen. Zurier", "Sen. Pearson" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2025-03-07", "status_url": null, "summary": "Rhode Island S 0627 proposes an Artificial Intelligence Act for high-risk AI systems. The definition of consequential decision expressly includes the provision, denial, terms, or conditions of legal services, placing AI systems used for those legal-services decisions within the bill’s high-risk framework. It was introduced and referred March 7, 2025.", "text_url": "https://webserver.rilegislature.gov/BillText/BillText25/SenateText25/S0627.pdf", "title": "Artificial Intelligence Act", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ri-2025-s-627", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ri-2025-s-627" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "wv-2025-sb-688", "bill_number": "SB 688", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Use of the following surveillance technologies by any law-enforcement officer or political subdivision official is prohibited for law enforcement purposes unless a warrant has been issued authorizing such use against a specific person based upon probable cause: (1) Real Time Security monitoring; (2) Multimodal vehicle recognition; (3) Facial recognition; (4) Surveillance drones; (5) License plate readers; and (6) Digital identity ecosystems. ... The working group ... shall create and make publicly available a model policy for use by law enforcement agencies.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "WV", "lane": [ "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "S To Government Organization.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": "Included as criminal-law-enforcement AI/facial-recognition lane; it does not regulate police-report drafting.", "operative_sections": [ "W. Va. Code §15-17-4: law-enforcement use of listed surveillance technologies, including facial recognition, requires a warrant for a specific person based on probable cause.", "W. Va. Code §15-17-5: creates a facial-recognition working group to publish a model policy for law-enforcement agencies.", "W. Va. Code §15-17-5(b): model policy must specify authorized uses and safeguards for facial-recognition technology." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_history.cfm?INPUT=688&year=2025&sessiontype=RS&btype=bill", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Rose", "Sen. Thorne", "Sen. Rucker", "Sen. Willis", "Sen. Hart" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2025-03-04", "status_url": "https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_history.cfm?INPUT=688&year=2025&sessiontype=RS&btype=bill", "summary": "West Virginia SB 688 would regulate law-enforcement use of artificial-intelligence facial-recognition and surveillance technologies. It prohibits listed uses, including facial recognition, unless a warrant authorizes use against a specific person based on probable cause, and creates a working group for model policies. It was sent to Government Organization on March 4, 2025.", "text_url": "https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_text.cfm?billdoc=SB688%20INTR.htm&yr=2025&sesstype=RS&i=688", "title": "Responsible Use of Facial Recognition Act", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/wv-2025-sb-688", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/wv-2025-sb-688" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ky-2025-hb-498", "bill_number": "HB 498", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "The General Assembly respectfully requests that the Supreme Court of Kentucky establish a pilot project to permit participating courts to use artificial intelligence for transcription services in court proceedings. ... The pilot project shall ... require participating courts to use artificial intelligence for transcription services in court proceedings; ... require notification to all parties ... that artificial intelligence will be used for transcription services.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "KY", "lane": [ "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "to Judiciary (H)", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Section 1(1): requests that the Kentucky Supreme Court establish an AI court transcription pilot project.", "Section 1(2): pilot rules would require participating courts to use AI transcription services and notify parties in advance.", "Section 1(3): Administrative Office of the Courts would evaluate cost savings, efficiency, and whether to expand the program." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/record/25rs/hb498.html", "sponsors": [ "Rep. Raymond" ], "status": "died", "status_date": "2025-02-21", "status_url": "https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/record/25rs/hb498.html", "summary": "Kentucky HB 498 requests that the Supreme Court establish a pilot project allowing participating courts to use artificial intelligence for transcription services in court proceedings. It requires party notification and Administrative Office of the Courts evaluation of costs, efficiency, and expansion. The bill was sent to House Judiciary on February 21, 2025.", "text_url": "https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/recorddocuments/bill/25RS/hb498/orig_bill.pdf", "title": "Use of artificial intelligence by courts", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ky-2025-hb-498", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ky-2025-hb-498" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "wv-2025-hb-2431", "bill_number": "HB 2431", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "§15-17-3. Prohibition against unreasonable surveillance and artificial intelligence technologies. Use of the following surveillance technologies by any law-enforcement officer or political subdivision official is prohibited: ... Facial recognition; ... Predictive policing algorithms; ... §15-17-5. Private cause of action. Any person whose rights have been violated by a law-enforcement officer or political subdivision official's use of any of the technologies prohibited by §15-17-3 shall have a private cause of action.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "WV", "lane": [ "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "H To House Judiciary.", "lead_source": [ "state legislature keyword search" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": "Included as criminal-law-enforcement AI/facial-recognition lane; it does not regulate police-report drafting.", "operative_sections": [ "W. Va. Code §15-17-3: prohibits law-enforcement and political-subdivision officials from using specified surveillance and AI technologies.", "W. Va. Code §15-17-3: listed technologies include facial recognition and predictive policing algorithms.", "W. Va. Code §15-17-5: creates a private cause of action for violations of the technology prohibitions." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_history.cfm?INPUT=2431&year=2025&sessiontype=RS&btype=bill", "sponsors": [ "Del. Anders", "Del. White", "Del. Coop-Gonzalez", "Del. Kump", "Del. Kimble", "Del. Dean", "Del. Bridges" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2025-02-17", "status_url": "https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_history.cfm?INPUT=2431&year=2025&sessiontype=RS&btype=bill", "summary": "West Virginia HB 2431 would prohibit law-enforcement officers and political-subdivision officials from using specified surveillance and artificial-intelligence technologies, including facial recognition and predictive policing algorithms. It also provides a private cause of action for violations. The House referred it to Judiciary on February 17, 2025.", "text_url": "https://www.wvlegislature.gov/Bill_Status/bills_text.cfm?billdoc=HB2431%20INTR.htm&yr=2025&sesstype=RS&i=2431", "title": "Fourth Amendment Restoration Act", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/wv-2025-hb-2431", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/wv-2025-hb-2431" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ok-2025-hb-2016", "bill_number": "HB 2016", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "An Act relating to evidence; amending 12 O.S. 2021, Section 2702, which relates to testimony by experts; providing for artificial intelligence expert testimony; amending 12 O.S. 2021, Section 2803, which relates to hearsay; ... amending 12 O.S. 2021, Section 2806, which relates to attacking and supporting credibility; providing for attacking and supporting credibility of artificial intelligence expert testimony.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "OK", "lane": [ "evidence" ], "last_action": "Referred to Rules.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row", "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": "Bill text sets a November 1, 2025 effective date if enacted; row leaves effective_date null because the bill did not become law.", "operative_sections": [ "12 O.S. §2702: would add provisions for artificial-intelligence expert testimony.", "12 O.S. §2803: would address hearsay exceptions for AI testimony or AI-generated material.", "12 O.S. §2806: would address attacking and supporting credibility of AI expert testimony." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=HB2016&Session=2500", "sponsors": [ "Rep. Pae" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2025-02-12", "status_url": "http://www.oklegislature.gov/BillInfo.aspx?Bill=HB2016&Session=2500", "summary": "Oklahoma HB 2016 proposes evidence-code amendments for artificial intelligence expert testimony. It addresses testimony by experts, hearsay, and attacking or supporting the credibility of AI expert testimony. The official bill information page shows referral to Rules on February 12, 2025; the bill did not advance during the final pass.", "text_url": "http://webserver1.lsb.state.ok.us/cf_pdf/2025-26%20INT/hB/HB2016%20INT.PDF", "title": "Evidence; artificial intelligence expert testimony", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ok-2025-hb-2016", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ok-2025-hb-2016" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "va-2025-hb-2433", "bill_number": "HB 2433", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Establish a comprehensive framework for the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning systems by law-enforcement agencies within the Commonwealth, which shall include ... guidelines on the use of generative AI and machine learning systems in (i) preparing and completing legal instruments and public records; (ii) generating or acquiring evidence that may be referenced in legal instruments or proceedings, or custodial or noncustodial interrogations; and (iii) processing information obtained through audio, visual, or digital surveillance.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "VA", "lane": [ "police-reports-criminal", "evidence" ], "last_action": "Left in Public Safety.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2025 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Va. Code §9.1-102(69): DCJS would establish a comprehensive framework for law enforcement generative AI and machine-learning systems.", "Va. Code §9.1-102(69)(a): policies would cover AI use in legal instruments, public records, evidence, interrogations, and surveillance processing.", "Va. Code §9.1-102(71): interrogation policies would address inauthentic replica documents or computer-generated audiovisual evidence." ], "session": "2025 Regular", "source_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB2433", "sponsors": [ "Del. Hope" ], "status": "died", "status_date": "2025-02-05", "status_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB2433", "summary": "Virginia HB 2433 would require a comprehensive framework for law enforcement generative AI and machine-learning systems. The framework covers legal instruments, public records, evidence referenced in proceedings, custodial or noncustodial interrogations, and surveillance processing, with training standards and model policies. The bill was left in Public Safety on February 5, 2025.", "text_url": "https://lis.virginia.gov/bill-details/20251/HB2433/text/HB2433", "title": "Law-enforcement agencies; use of certain technologies and interrogation practices", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/va-2025-hb-2433", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/va-2025-hb-2433" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ca-2024-sb-970", "bill_number": "SB 970", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "1425. (a) By no later than January 1, 2026, the Judicial Council shall review the impact of artificial intelligence on the introduction of evidence in court proceedings and develop any necessary rules of court to assist courts in assessing claims that evidence that is being introduced has been generated by or manipulated by artificial intelligence.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "CA", "lane": [ "evidence", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "From committee without further action.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2024 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Evid. Code §1425(a): Judicial Council would review AI’s impact on introduction of evidence and develop rules of court.", "Evid. Code §1425(b): AI and synthetic-media definitions tied to Penal Code §540." ], "session": "2023-2024", "source_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB970", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Ashby" ], "status": "died", "status_date": "2024-11-30", "status_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB970", "summary": "California SB 970 would have required Judicial Council review of artificial intelligence’s impact on evidence introduced in court proceedings and any necessary rules for AI-generated or manipulated evidence. The official history shows the bill ended in committee without further action on November 30, 2024.", "text_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB970", "title": "Artificial intelligence technology", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2024-sb-970", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2024-sb-970" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ca-2024-ab-2811", "bill_number": "AB 2811", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "6068.1. (a) For each document that an attorney files, or intends to file, in a court of appropriate jurisdiction of this state or federal court within this state, the attorney shall execute and maintain ... an affidavit certifying whether a generative artificial intelligence program was used in the drafting of the document.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "CA", "lane": [ "attorney-ai-use", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "From committee without further action.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2024 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Bus. & Prof. Code §6068.1(a): attorneys would maintain a seven-year affidavit for each court filing on generative AI use.", "Bus. & Prof. Code §6068.1 affidavit text: if AI was used, generated text, citations, and legal analysis must be reviewed for accuracy and approved." ], "session": "2023-2024", "source_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2811", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Lowenthal" ], "status": "died", "status_date": "2024-11-30", "status_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billHistoryClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2811", "summary": "California AB 2811 would have required attorneys to execute and retain an artificial-intelligence compliance affidavit for each state or federal court filing in California. The affidavit would disclose generative AI use and certify human review of generated text, citations, and legal analysis. The bill died November 30, 2024.", "text_url": "https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB2811", "title": "Attorneys: court filings: artificial intelligence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2024-ab-2811", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ca-2024-ab-2811" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "de-2024-hb-333", "bill_number": "HB 333", "effective_date": "2024-07-17", "excerpt": "The Delaware AI Commission is created to do all of the following: (a) Make recommendations to the General Assembly and to the Chief Information Officer of the Department on legislative and executive actions regarding AI in Delaware. (b) Develop and recommend statewide processes, principles, and guidelines for executive, legislative, and judicial agencies to follow regarding use of AI. Conduct an inventory of all Generative AI usage in Delaware executive, legislative, and judicial agencies and identify high risk areas.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "DE", "lane": [ "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "Signed 7/17/24.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2024 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "29 Del. C. §9042C(a): creates the Delaware AI Commission to make AI recommendations.", "29 Del. C. §9042C(b): commission develops statewide AI processes, principles, and guidelines for executive, legislative, and judicial agencies.", "29 Del. C. §9042C(b): commission inventories generative-AI usage in executive, legislative, and judicial agencies and identifies high-risk areas." ], "session": "152nd General Assembly", "source_url": "https://legis.delaware.gov/BillDetail?LegislationId=140866", "sponsors": [ "Rep. Baumbach", "Sen. Sokola" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2024-07-17", "status_url": "https://legis.delaware.gov/BillDetail?LegislationId=140866", "summary": "Delaware HB 333 creates the Delaware Artificial Intelligence Commission. Its duties include recommending statewide AI processes, principles, and guidelines for executive, legislative, and judicial agencies and inventorying generative AI use in those agencies. The Governor signed the bill on July 17, 2024, and it took effect that day.", "text_url": "https://legis.delaware.gov/json/BillDetail/GenerateHtmlDocumentEngrossment?engrossmentId=36232&docTypeId=6", "title": "Delaware Artificial Intelligence Commission", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/de-2024-hb-333", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/de-2024-hb-333" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2024-a-10625", "bill_number": "A10625", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Artificial intelligence-generated outputs, including facial recognition results, shall not be admissible as evidence in any criminal or civil court proceeding. No party in a criminal or civil case shall reference or introduce artificial intelligence-generated outputs, including facial recognition results, during questioning of witnesses, suspects, or defendants. Artificial intelligence-generated outputs shall not form the basis for any legal decision or judgment. Defendants shall have the right to expert witnesses who can testify about the reliability and limitations of artificial intelligence and facial recognition technology systems used in the investigation of their cases.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "evidence", "police-reports-criminal", "legal-aid-a2j" ], "last_action": "referred to codes", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2024 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Crim. Proc. Law §60.77(1): AI-generated outputs, including facial-recognition results, would be inadmissible in criminal or civil court proceedings.", "Crim. Proc. Law §60.77(3): AI-generated outputs could not form the basis for any legal decision or judgment.", "Crim. Proc. Law §60.77(4)-(5): defendants would have expert-witness access and prosecutorial disclosure of AI/FRT systems used in investigations." ], "session": "2023-2024", "source_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2023&bn=A10625&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Rules (Bichotte Hermelyn)" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2024-06-20", "status_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2023&bn=A10625&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "summary": "New York A10625 would regulate AI and facial-recognition use in criminal investigations and impose court restrictions. AI-generated outputs, including facial-recognition results, would be inadmissible and could not support legal decisions. It also gives defendants expert-witness access in cases involving such systems. The bill was referred June 20, 2024.", "text_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2023&bn=A10625&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "title": "Division of Criminal Justice Services: AI and facial recognition", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2024-a-10625", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2024-a-10625" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2024-s-9640", "bill_number": "S09640", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Rule 2107. (a) Certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence. Any paper or file served that was drafted with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence must attach to the filing a separate affidavit disclosing such use and certifying that a human being has reviewed the source material and verified that the artificially generated content is accurate. ... if required by rule 2107, a disclosure of the use of generative artificial intelligence in the drafting of the brief and certification that the content therein was reviewed and verified by a human.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "attorney-ai-use", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "REFERRED TO JUDICIARY", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2024 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "CPLR Rule 2107(a): papers drafted with generative AI must attach an affidavit disclosing use and certifying human review and verification.", "CPLR Rule 5528(a)(6): appellate briefs must include Rule 2107 AI disclosure and human-review certification when required." ], "session": "2023-2024", "source_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S09640", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Hoylman-Sigal" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2024-05-16", "status_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S09640", "summary": "New York S09640 would require disclosure and certification when generative AI assists in drafting papers or files served in civil actions. It also amends appellate-brief contents to include AI-use disclosure and human review certification when required. The Senate referred the bill to Judiciary on May 16, 2024.", "text_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S09640", "title": "Certification of filings produced using generative artificial intelligence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2024-s-9640", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2024-s-9640" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "md-2024-sb-182", "bill_number": "SB 182", "effective_date": "2024-10-01", "excerpt": "2–502. (A) Except as otherwise provided in this section, results generated by facial recognition technology may not be introduced in a criminal proceeding or in a delinquency proceeding. ... Results generated by facial recognition technology may be considered or introduced as evidence in connection with a criminal proceeding only for the purpose of establishing probable cause or positive identification in connection with the issuance of a warrant or at a preliminary hearing. ... Results generated by facial recognition technology may not serve as the sole basis to establish probable cause or the positive identification of an individual.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "MD", "lane": [ "evidence", "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "Approved by the Governor - Chapter 808.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Crim. Proc. §2-502(A): facial-recognition results generally may not be introduced in criminal or delinquency proceedings.", "Crim. Proc. §2-502(B): limited use is allowed only for probable cause or positive identification at warrant issuance or preliminary hearing.", "Crim. Proc. §2-502(B)(2): facial-recognition results may not be the sole basis for probable cause or positive identification." ], "session": "2024 Regular", "source_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/sb0182?ys=2024RS", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Charles Sydnor" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2024-05-16", "status_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/sb0182?ys=2024RS", "summary": "Maryland SB 182 regulates law enforcement facial-recognition technology in criminal investigations and proceedings. It generally bars facial-recognition results from criminal and delinquency proceedings, permits limited use for warrants or preliminary hearings, and forbids sole reliance for probable cause or identification. The Governor approved it May 16, 2024.", "text_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2024RS/bills/sb/sb0182e.pdf", "title": "Criminal Procedure - Facial Recognition Technology - Requirements, Procedures, and Prohibitions", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/md-2024-sb-182", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/md-2024-sb-182" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "md-2024-hb-338", "bill_number": "HB 338", "effective_date": "2024-10-01", "excerpt": "2–502. (A) Except as otherwise provided in this section, results generated by facial recognition technology may not be introduced in a criminal proceeding or in a delinquency proceeding. ... Results generated by facial recognition technology may be considered or introduced as evidence in connection with a criminal proceeding only for the purpose of establishing probable cause or positive identification in connection with the issuance of a warrant or at a preliminary hearing. ... Results generated by facial recognition technology may not serve as the sole basis to establish probable cause or the positive identification of an individual.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "MD", "lane": [ "evidence", "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "Approved by the Governor - Chapter 809.", "lead_source": [ "Maryland General Assembly primary bill search", "state legislature keyword search" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Crim. Proc. §2-502(A): facial-recognition results generally may not be introduced in criminal or delinquency proceedings.", "Crim. Proc. §2-502(B): limited use is allowed only for probable cause or positive identification at warrant issuance or preliminary hearing.", "Crim. Proc. §2-502(B)(2): facial-recognition results may not be the sole basis for probable cause or positive identification." ], "session": "2024 Regular", "source_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/hb0338?ys=2024RS", "sponsors": [ "Del. Moon" ], "status": "in-force", "status_date": "2024-05-16", "status_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/hb0338?ys=2024RS", "summary": "Maryland HB 338 is the House companion regulating facial-recognition technology for criminal investigations and proceedings. It generally excludes facial-recognition results from criminal and delinquency proceedings, limits use to probable cause or identification at specified stages, and bars sole reliance. The Governor approved Chapter 809 on May 16, 2024.", "text_url": "https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2024RS/bills/hb/hb0338e.pdf", "title": "Criminal Procedure - Facial Recognition Technology - Requirements, Procedures, and Prohibitions", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/md-2024-hb-338", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/md-2024-hb-338" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "us-118-hr-7394", "bill_number": "H.R. 7394", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Any results or reports resulting from analysis by computational forensic software shall be provided to the defendant, and the defendant shall be accorded access to both an executable copy of and the source code for the version of the computational forensic software ... In any criminal case, evidence that is the result of analysis by computational forensic software is admissible only if the computational forensic software used has been submitted to the Computational Forensic Algorithm Testing Program ...", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "US", "lane": [ "evidence", "police-reports-criminal" ], "last_action": "Introduced; referred to the House Committees on the Judiciary and Science, Space, and Technology.", "lead_source": [ "user-provided known in-lane row" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "§2(b): no trade-secret evidentiary privilege would withhold relevant evidence in U.S. criminal proceedings.", "§2(f): defendants must receive reports and access to executable copies, source code, instructions, files, and data for computational forensic software used in the case.", "§2(g): computational-forensic-software evidence is admissible only if tested and defense testing claims are waived." ], "session": "118th Congress", "source_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-118hr7394ih", "sponsors": [ "Rep. Mark Takano", "Rep. Dwight Evans" ], "status": "died", "status_date": "2024-02-15", "status_url": "https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7394", "summary": "Federal H.R. 7394, the Justice in Forensic Algorithms Act, would regulate computational forensic software in criminal cases. It removes trade-secret privilege for relevant evidence, grants defense access to source code and related materials, and makes software-derived evidence admissible only if testing conditions are met. It died after the 118th Congress.", "text_url": "https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/BILLS-118hr7394ih", "title": "Justice in Forensic Algorithms Act of 2024", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/us-118-hr-7394", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/us-118-hr-7394" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2024-s-8390", "bill_number": "S08390", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Evidence created, in whole or in part, by artificial intelligence shall not be received into evidence in a criminal proceeding unless the evidence is substantially supported by independent and admissible evidence and the proponent of the evidence establishes the reliability and accuracy of the specific use of the artificial intelligence in creating the evidence. Evidence processed, in whole or in part, by artificial intelligence shall not be received into evidence in a criminal proceeding unless the proponent of the evidence establishes the reliability and accuracy of the specific use of the artificial intelligence in processing the evidence.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "evidence" ], "last_action": "REFERRED TO CODES", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2024 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Crim. Proc. Law §60.80(1): AI-created evidence is inadmissible in criminal proceedings unless supported by independent admissible evidence and reliability is established.", "Crim. Proc. Law §60.80(2): AI-processed evidence is inadmissible unless the proponent establishes reliability and accuracy of that AI use." ], "session": "2023-2024", "source_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S08390", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Cooney" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2024-01-26", "status_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S08390", "summary": "New York S08390 is the Senate companion on AI-created or AI-processed evidence in criminal proceedings. It requires independent admissible support for AI-created evidence and reliability proof for AI-created or processed evidence before receipt. The Senate referred the bill to Codes on January 26, 2024.", "text_url": "https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2023/S08390", "title": "Admissibility of evidence created by artificial intelligence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2024-s-8390", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2024-s-8390" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "wa-2024-sb-6073", "bill_number": "SB 6073", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Any party, including an attorney for a party or a pro se party, using any generative artificial intelligence language learning model tool to conduct legal research or to draft documents for filing with a Washington court must: (a) Disclose in the filing that artificial intelligence was used, with the disclosure including the specific artificial intelligence tool and the manner in which it was used; and (b) Certify that each and every citation to the law or the record in the document has been verified as accurate.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "WA", "lane": [ "attorney-ai-use", "courts-judiciary" ], "last_action": "Public hearing in the Senate Committee on Law & Justice at 10:30 AM.", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2024 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "New RCW 2.48 section (1): parties, attorneys, and pro se parties using generative AI for legal research or drafting court filings must disclose it.", "New RCW 2.48 section (1)(a): disclosure must name the specific AI tool and describe how it was used.", "New RCW 2.48 section (1)(b): filers must certify that every law or record citation was verified as accurate." ], "session": "2024 Regular", "source_url": "https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=6073&Year=2023&Initiative=false", "sponsors": [ "Sen. Padden", "Sen. Kuderer" ], "status": "died", "status_date": "2024-01-22", "status_url": "https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=6073&Year=2023&Initiative=false", "summary": "Washington SB 6073 would require attorneys, represented parties, and pro se parties using generative AI language models for legal research or drafting Washington court filings to disclose the tool, explain its use, and certify citation accuracy. The bill received a Senate Law and Justice public hearing on January 22, 2024.", "text_url": "https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2023-24/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/6073.pdf", "title": "Use of artificial intelligence language learning models in official court filings", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/wa-2024-sb-6073", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/wa-2024-sb-6073" }, { "archive_url": null, "bill_id": "ny-2024-a-8110", "bill_number": "A08110", "effective_date": null, "excerpt": "Evidence created, in whole or in part, by artificial intelligence shall not be received into evidence in a criminal proceeding unless the evidence is substantially supported by independent and admissible evidence and the proponent of the evidence establishes the reliability and accuracy of the specific use of the artificial intelligence in creating the evidence. Evidence processed, in whole or in part, by artificial intelligence shall not be received into evidence in a criminal proceeding unless the proponent of the evidence establishes the reliability and accuracy of the specific use of the artificial intelligence in processing the evidence.", "fetched_at": "2026-09-07T00:00:00Z", "jurisdiction": "NY", "lane": [ "evidence" ], "last_action": "referred to codes", "lead_source": [ "archived NCSL 2024 AI legislation table" ], "legiscan_bill_id": null, "notes": null, "operative_sections": [ "Crim. Proc. Law §60.80(1): AI-created evidence is inadmissible in criminal proceedings unless supported by independent admissible evidence and reliability is established.", "Crim. Proc. Law §60.80(2): AI-processed evidence is inadmissible unless the proponent establishes reliability and accuracy of that AI use." ], "session": "2023-2024", "source_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2023&bn=A08110&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "sponsors": [ "Asm. Vanel" ], "status": "in-committee", "status_date": "2024-01-03", "status_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2023&bn=A08110&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "summary": "New York A08110 proposes criminal-procedure rules for evidence created or processed by artificial intelligence. Prosecutors or other proponents would have to support AI-created evidence with independent admissible evidence and establish the reliability and accuracy of the specific AI use. The Assembly referred the bill to Codes on January 3, 2024.", "text_url": "https://assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?term=2023&bn=A08110&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Text=Y", "title": "Admissibility of evidence created or processed by artificial intelligence", "verification": "fetched-and-read", "url": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2024-a-8110", "notice": "Provided as is, without warranty. Not legal advice. SafeLegalAI (Cognesio LLP) records what courts, regulators, legislatures and vendors' own public pages state; the linked official documents are the record. Names and marks belong to their owners. Anyone named may reply: https://safelegalai.com/report. Full terms: https://safelegalai.com/disclaimer", "page": "https://safelegalai.com/regulation/legislation/ny-2024-a-8110" } ] }