### This week in legal AI — South Africa 5 updates on the record, 2026-07-16 to 2026-09-05. - **Analysis · 2026-09-03** — [Summer 2026 in legal AI regulation: SRA warning notice, mandatory Irish declaration and a deferred EU Act](https://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-regulation-summer-2026-what-changed?utm_source=syndication&utm_medium=newsletter) Summer 2026 reviewed: the SRA's AI warning notice, Ireland's mandatory AI declaration in civil filings and the EU's deferred high-risk AI Act duties. - **Weekly briefing · 2026-09-03** — [This week in legal AI safety: tracker reaches 122 incidents; SRA AI warning notice; Ireland's HC 142 live](https://safelegalai.com/newsletter/this-week-in-legal-ai-safety-2026-36?utm_source=syndication&utm_medium=newsletter) Issue 1: 50 incidents added, the SRA's misuse-of-AI warning notice, Ireland's Practice Direction HC 142, deferred EU high-risk duties, 128 tools on record. - **Incident · South Africa · 2026-07-31** — [FJL v TGO, Case No. 2025/220239 (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, full court)](https://safelegalai.com/tracker/fjl-v-tgo?utm_source=syndication&utm_medium=newsletter) A full court of the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, upheld an acting judge's findings in a parenting dispute but identified at least eleven fictitious or garbled citations in his judgment, most plausibly AI hallucinations. Opperman J referred the acting judge to the Legal Practice Council, highlighting an accountability gap for acting judges. Primary source: [FJL v TGO (2025/220239) [2026] ZAGPJHC (31 Jul 2026), reportable full-court judgment (Charlotin database archive PDF)](https://www.damiencharlotin.com/documents/2724/FJL_v_TGO_2026__25-220239_GJ.pdf) - **Rule · SA Judiciary Conference · 2026-07-16** — [2026 Judiciary Conference Resolutions, Section 5 — Information Communication Technology, Digitisation and Artificial Intelligence](https://safelegalai.com/regulation/south-africa/za-judiciary-conference-2026-resolutions-ai?utm_source=syndication&utm_medium=newsletter) Adopted at the 2026 Judiciary Conference held in Umhlanga, Durban, 13–16 July 2026. Resolutions adopted by the South African Judiciary on 16 July 2026. Section 5 directs the Judiciary Administration and Information Technology Steering Committee to finalise the draft judiciary AI policy, requires the Judiciary to retain governance over AI procurement and deployment, restricts initial AI use to efficiency tools, and mandates ongoing judicial education on responsible AI use. Primary source: [SA Judiciary Conference — Final adopted](https://www.judiciary.org.za/images/news/2026/FINAL%20ADOPTED%202026%20Judiciary%20Conference%20Resolutions.pdf) - **Analysis · 2026-07-16** — [South Africa's regulator vacuum: courts doing the LPC's job on AI](https://safelegalai.com/analysis/south-africa-lpc-regulator-vacuum?utm_source=syndication&utm_medium=newsletter) South Africa's Legal Practice Council has published no guidance on lawyers' AI use — so its courts are referring practitioners to it instead, case by case. _Source: SafeLegalAI (safelegalai.com), published by Cognesio LLP. Data CC BY 4.0. Scope: South Africa. As of 2026-09-05. Records: https://safelegalai.com/tracker/south-africa · Feed: https://safelegalai.com/watch/jurisdiction/south-africa.xml_