Court incidents, official rule revisions and analysis in International, as they enter the record. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.https://safelegalai.comen-gbCC BY 4.0 — SafeLegalAI, published by Cognesio LLPhttps://safelegalai.com/reviews/ai-court-rules-worldwide-comparisonhttps://safelegalai.com/reviews/ai-court-rules-worldwide-comparison46 binding court instruments and 130 country records on one schema: 6 countries bind filers to disclose or certify, 10 to verify, most say nothing.Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/ai-sanctions-ledger-2023-2026https://safelegalai.com/analysis/ai-sanctions-ledger-2023-2026150 tracker rows, 45 with a stated figure: USD 371,542 across 34 US orders, median USD 5,000; 48 regulator referrals, 5 verified dispositions.Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalvendor:openai-chatgptvendor:anthropic-claudehttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/consumer-ai-legal-chatbots-on-the-recordhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/consumer-ai-legal-chatbots-on-the-record12 consumer legal-AI services on one schema, 41 self-represented rows in the incident tracker, two docket studies of AI pro se filings, and the regulators.Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleukus-federalus-stateinternationalvendor:openai-chatgpthttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/judges-and-courts-using-ai-recordhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/judges-and-courts-using-ai-record106 instruments on judges' AI use and 11 decisions where an adjudicator relied on fabricated authority: 10 countries bind judges, 22 guide, 6 are drafting.Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalvendor:openai-chatgpthttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-search-demand-2026https://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-search-demand-2026Ten Semrush keyword sets, 998 rows, US and UK: brand and vendor-comparison queries dominate; incident, error-rate and dated-regulation queries go unserved.Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalvendor:harveyvendor:legoravendor:lexis-aihttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/regulator-outcomes-after-ai-misuse-referralshttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/regulator-outcomes-after-ai-misuse-referrals48 matters before regulators in 7 countries: 5 dispositions verified from the regulator's own document (7 rows), 4 reported, 36 open; the fastest took 104 days.Sat, 05 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/ai-rules-for-lawyers-and-courts-130-countries-september-2026https://safelegalai.com/analysis/ai-rules-for-lawyers-and-courts-130-countries-september-2026A dataset-first report on AI rules for lawyers and courts across 130 records, with provisional countries separated from checked counts.Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/may-judges-use-ai-explainerhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/may-judges-use-ai-explainerThe regulation map records 39 country answers on judicial AI use: binding rules, guidance, proposals and one case-law answer.Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleukirelandus-federalcanadaaustraliaindiainternationalotherhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/must-lawyers-verify-ai-output-explainerhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/must-lawyers-verify-ai-output-explainerAcross 130 country records, 50 have a binding, guidance, proposed or case-law answer on verification of AI output.Fri, 04 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleukirelandus-federalus-statecanadaaustraliaindiasingaporeinternationalotherhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-incident-report-q3-2026https://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-incident-report-q3-20261 July to 3 September 2026: 54 tracker incidents in 11 jurisdictions, USD 132,888 in stated US penalties, 20 rows with a regulator referral or disposition.Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalvendor:openai-chatgpthttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-regulation-summer-2026-what-changedhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-regulation-summer-2026-what-changedSummer 2026 reviewed: the SRA's AI warning notice, Ireland's mandatory AI declaration in civil filings and the EU's deferred high-risk AI Act duties.Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleukirelandus-stateeuindiasouth-africainternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/newsletter/this-week-in-legal-ai-safety-2026-36https://safelegalai.com/newsletter/this-week-in-legal-ai-safety-2026-36Issue 1: 50 incidents added, the SRA's misuse-of-AI warning notice, Ireland's Practice Direction HC 142, deferred EU high-risk duties, 128 tools on record.Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleukirelandus-federalus-stateeusouth-africainternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/how-often-legal-ai-hallucinates-evidencehttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/how-often-legal-ai-hallucinates-evidenceEvery published measurement of legal-AI error on one schema, set against the vendor claims: 17% to 33% for research tools, 43% to 88% for general models.Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalvendor:lexis-aivendor:harveyvendor:openai-chatgpthttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-by-the-numbers-adoption-governancehttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/legal-ai-by-the-numbers-adoption-governanceEvery 2024 to 2026 survey of AI in legal practice on one schema: adoption runs 30% to 92% depending on who asked; 43% of firms have no policy, 54% no training.Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalvendor:lexis-aihttps://safelegalai.com/resources/glossaryhttps://safelegalai.com/resources/glossaryPlain-English definitions courts use when sanctioning AI-fabricated citations: hallucination, Hamid jurisdiction, wasted costs, Rule 11, and more.Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/resources/readinghttps://safelegalai.com/resources/readingThe judgments, court rules, regulator guidance, and research worth reading first on AI in legal practice — annotated and grouped by who needs them.Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/analysis/three-years-legal-ai-hallucinations-2023-2026https://safelegalai.com/analysis/three-years-legal-ai-hallucinations-2023-2026From Mata v Avianca to a $110,000 Oregon sanction: what the verified record of AI-fabricated citations shows about courts, regulators, and the firms involved.Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/resources/guidance/tier3-ai-guidance-india-brazil-hongkong-gulfhttps://safelegalai.com/resources/guidance/tier3-ai-guidance-india-brazil-hongkong-gulfAI guidance in India (Kerala), Brazil (CNJ Res. 615), Hong Kong, and the Gulf (QFC) — judicial and regulator documents beyond the big jurisdictions.Thu, 16 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/newsletter/this-week-in-legal-ai-safety-issue-0https://safelegalai.com/newsletter/this-week-in-legal-ai-safety-issue-0A sample issue showing the weekly format: incidents worldwide, regulator watch, one analysis take, and the tracker stat of the week.Wed, 15 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMTarticleinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-uncitral-wgii-ai-dispute-resolution-colloquiumhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-uncitral-wgii-ai-dispute-resolution-colloquiumCommission adopted texts on electronic arbitral awards and Model Law revisions and set future work on dispute resolution in the digital economy; no AI-specific text adopted. UNCITRAL has no AI-in-arbitration instrument. On a 2025 Commission mandate, Working Group II held a colloquium on 16-17 February 2026 covering arbitrators' use of AI, AI in mediation and remote hearings, to inform a recommendation to the Commission's 59th session, which instead prioritised dispute resolution in the digital economy for future work. Primary source: UNCITRAL WG II — Commission 59th session — https://unis.unvienna.org/unis/en/pressrels/2026/unisl400.htmlFri, 10 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-coe-framework-convention-ai-cets-225https://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-coe-framework-convention-ai-cets-225First ratification. Treaty Office chart of 3 September 2026 shows 20 signatures without ratification; not yet in force. The first international treaty on AI, adopted 17 May 2024 and opened for signature in Vilnius on 5 September 2024. Parties must ensure AI lifecycle activities respect human rights, democracy and the rule of law, with transparency, accountability, remedies and risk assessment. As of 3 September 2026 only the EU has ratified; five ratifications are needed. Primary source: CoE — EU ratification — https://www.coe.int/en/web/artificial-intelligence/-/european-union-ratifies-the-council-of-europe-framework-convention-on-artificial-intelligenceFri, 15 May 2026 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-lcia-rules-revision-consultation-2026https://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-lcia-rules-revision-consultation-2026Submissions closed 11 May 2026; draft revised Arbitration and Mediation Rules due for a second round later in 2026. On 11 March 2026 the LCIA opened consultation on the next edition of its 2020 Arbitration Rules. Listed themes include AI disclosure and guardrails alongside digital-ready proceedings, cybersecurity and data protection. Stage 1 closed on 11 May 2026 and draft rules will be published for further comment later in 2026. The LCIA currently has no AI-specific guidance. Primary source: LCIA — Stage 1 consultation — https://www.lcia.org/News/lcia-rules-revision-consultation.aspxWed, 11 Mar 2026 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-uncitral-wgii-ai-dispute-resolution-colloquiumhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-uncitral-wgii-ai-dispute-resolution-colloquiumUNCITRAL has no AI-in-arbitration instrument. On a 2025 Commission mandate, Working Group II held a colloquium on 16-17 February 2026 covering arbitrators' use of AI, AI in mediation and remote hearings, to inform a recommendation to the Commission's 59th session, which instead prioritised dispute resolution in the digital economy for future work. Primary source: UNCITRAL WG II — Colloquium on AI in dispute resolution and remote hearings — https://uncitral.un.org/en/colloquium_aidisputeresolutionMon, 16 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-iba-anlbs-ai-professional-tool-guidehttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-iba-anlbs-ai-professional-tool-guideUpdated country chapters; biennial updates intended. An IBA committee compendium first published in September 2024 and updated in February 2026, surveying guidelines, ethics opinions and statutes on lawyers' professional use of AI across multilateral organisations and more than 36 jurisdictions. It is descriptive rather than prescriptive but is the broadest cross-border map of bar-level AI guidance. Primary source: IBA ANLBS — February 2026 update — https://www.ibanet.org/medias/anlbs-ai-working-group-report-feb-2026-2.pdfSun, 01 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/cepej-guidelines-generative-ai-courtshttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/cepej-guidelines-generative-ai-courtsGuidelines adopted 19 December 2025 by the Council of Europe's CEPEJ for courts and tribunals in its 46 member states on using generative AI. Judicial use must be transparent, AI output can never bind a judge, the right to a human judge is guaranteed, and confidential case data must be protected. They replace the February 2024 information note. Primary source: CEPEJ — Final — https://rm.coe.int/cepej-2025-18final-en-draft-guidelines-on-the-use-of-generative-ai-for/48802a4ad1Fri, 19 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-unesco-guidelines-ai-courts-tribunalshttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-unesco-guidelines-ai-courts-tribunalsPublished 3 December 2025; launched at the Athens Roundtable on AI and the Rule of Law, London, 4 December 2025. Published 3 December 2025 after a global consultation, the Guidelines are UNESCO's ethical and operational framework for AI in judicial systems. Fifteen principles in five groups - human rights and equality; safety, security and accuracy; explainability, transparency and auditability; awareness and accountability; human-centred decision-making - are paired with recommendations for judicial organisations and individual judges. Primary source: UNESCO — Final — https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000396582Wed, 03 Dec 2025 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-ciarb-ai-arbitration-guidelinehttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-ciarb-ai-arbitration-guidelineRevised text; adds a template Agreement on the Use of AI and a template Procedural Order. Ciarb's non-binding guideline, launched in March 2025 and updated in September 2025, in four parts: benefits and risks; general recommendations; arbitrators' powers to rule on and require disclosure of AI use; and arbitrators' own use of AI. Appendices give a template party agreement and procedural order. It adopts the OECD definition of AI. Primary source: Ciarb — Updated September 2025 — https://www.ciarb.org/media/bpndtcgu/guideline-on-the-use-of-ai-in-arbitration_updated-sept-2025.pdfFri, 05 Sep 2025 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-viac-note-ai-arbitrationhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-viac-note-ai-arbitrationA short non-binding note published by VIAC in April 2025 for arbitrations under the Vienna Rules 2021. Six headings cover ethical rules, non-delegation of decision-making, confidentiality, responsible and competent use, management of AI use at the case-management conference, and evidence. Arbitrators may inform parties of the AI tools they plan to use and invite comment. Primary source: VIAC — First edition — https://www.viac.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/VIAC-Note-on-AI-1.pdfWed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-ciarb-ai-arbitration-guidelinehttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-ciarb-ai-arbitration-guidelineCiarb's non-binding guideline, launched in March 2025 and updated in September 2025, in four parts: benefits and risks; general recommendations; arbitrators' powers to rule on and require disclosure of AI use; and arbitrators' own use of AI. Appendices give a template party agreement and procedural order. It adopts the OECD definition of AI. Primary source: Ciarb — Original — https://www.ciarb.org/news-listing/ciarb-launches-guideline-on-the-use-of-ai-in-arbitration/Sat, 01 Mar 2025 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-scc-guide-ai-arbitrationhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-scc-guide-ai-arbitrationAnnounced 17 October 2024. Adopted by the SCC Board on 16 October 2024, this light-touch guide offers flexible, non-mandatory guidance to tribunals and participants in SCC cases. Citing the EU AI Act's high-risk classification of AI used by tribunals, it addresses confidentiality, quality through human review of outputs, integrity through disclosure of AI use, and non-delegation of arbitral decision-making. Primary source: SCC — Adopted by the SCC Board — https://sccarbitrationinstitute.se/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/scc_guide_to_the_use_of_artificial_intelligence_in_cases_administered_under_the_scc_rules-1.pdfWed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-iba-caidp-future-is-now-reporthttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-iba-caidp-future-is-now-reportLaunched at the IBA Annual Conference, Mexico City, 19 September 2024; released 30 September 2024. A September 2024 IBA and CAIDP report on AI's impact on law firms, the profession and regulation, based on a survey of 210 firms of which 43 per cent had no AI policy. It recommends AI governance policies, AI-literacy training, updated ethics rules covering supervision of AI tools and disclosure of AI use, and consistent cross-border regulation. Primary source: IBA/CAIDP — September 2024 — https://www.ibanet.org/document?id=The-future-is%20now-AI-and-the-legal-profession-reportThu, 19 Sep 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-iba-anlbs-ai-professional-tool-guidehttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-iba-anlbs-ai-professional-tool-guideAn IBA committee compendium first published in September 2024 and updated in February 2026, surveying guidelines, ethics opinions and statutes on lawyers' professional use of AI across multilateral organisations and more than 36 jurisdictions. It is descriptive rather than prescriptive but is the broadest cross-border map of bar-level AI guidance. Primary source: IBA ANLBS — First edition — https://www.ibanet.org/PPID/Constituent/Multi-displry_Pract/anlbs-ai-reportWed, 18 Sep 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-coe-framework-convention-ai-cets-225https://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-coe-framework-convention-ai-cets-225Signed in Vilnius by 10 states plus the EU; corrected certified copy per Committee of Ministers decision of 30 April 2025. The first international treaty on AI, adopted 17 May 2024 and opened for signature in Vilnius on 5 September 2024. Parties must ensure AI lifecycle activities respect human rights, democracy and the rule of law, with transparency, accountability, remedies and risk assessment. As of 3 September 2026 only the EU has ratified; five ratifications are needed. Primary source: CoE — Opened for signature — https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=225Thu, 05 Sep 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-unesco-guidelines-ai-courts-tribunalshttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-unesco-guidelines-ai-courts-tribunalsPublished 3 December 2025 after a global consultation, the Guidelines are UNESCO's ethical and operational framework for AI in judicial systems. Fifteen principles in five groups - human rights and equality; safety, security and accuracy; explainability, transparency and auditability; awareness and accountability; human-centred decision-making - are paired with recommendations for judicial organisations and individual judges. Primary source: UNESCO — Draft for consultation — https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000390781Sun, 01 Sep 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-jams-ai-disputes-ruleshttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-jams-ai-disputes-rulesFirst ADR rules specific to disputes about AI systems; announced 23 April 2024. JAMS rules and model clause for arbitrating disputes about AI systems. They are procedural rules for AI subject-matter disputes rather than guidance on participants' use of AI: JAMS proposes panelists with technical expertise, and a default AI Disputes Protective Order limits inspection of AI systems, models and training data to experts in a secured environment. Primary source: JAMS — Effective — https://www.jamsadr.com/artificial-intelligence-disputes-clause-and-rulesFri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-coe-framework-convention-ai-cets-225https://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-coe-framework-convention-ai-cets-225The first international treaty on AI, adopted 17 May 2024 and opened for signature in Vilnius on 5 September 2024. Parties must ensure AI lifecycle activities respect human rights, democracy and the rule of law, with transparency, accountability, remedies and risk assessment. As of 3 September 2026 only the EU has ratified; five ratifications are needed. Primary source: CoE — Adopted by the Committee of Ministers — https://rm.coe.int/1680afae3cFri, 17 May 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-oecd-recommendation-aihttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-oecd-recommendation-aiUpdated for generative AI; 47 adherents. Non-binding OECD standard adopted in 2019 and revised on 3 May 2024, setting five values-based principles: inclusive growth; respect for the rule of law, human rights and democratic values including fairness and privacy; transparency and explainability; robustness, security and safety; and accountability. Its AI-system definition is used by the EU AI Act. Primary source: OECD — Revised — https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/api/print?ids=648&lang=enFri, 03 May 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-svamc-ai-arbitration-guidelineshttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-svamc-ai-arbitration-guidelinesPublished 30 April 2024, the SVAMC Guidelines are seven best-practice guidelines for parties, counsel and arbitrators using AI in international arbitration, adoptable by agreement or procedural order. They cover understanding tools, confidentiality, case-by-case disclosure, counsel's duty of competence and to verify output, AI-generated evidence, and a ban on arbitrators delegating their mandate. Primary source: SVAMC — First edition — https://svamc.org/wp-content/uploads/SVAMC-AI-Guidelines-First-Edition.pdfTue, 30 Apr 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/cepej-information-note-generative-aihttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/cepej-information-note-generative-aiAn information note issued by the Council of Europe's CEPEJ in February 2024 cautioning judges, court staff and lawyers about generative AI. It highlighted hallucinated output, confidentiality of case data and the need for human oversight. The note was superseded on 19 December 2025 by CEPEJ's formal guidelines on generative AI in courts. Primary source: CEPEJ — February 2024 — https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/newpage-cyberThu, 01 Feb 2024 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-ccje-opinion-26-assistive-technologyhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-ccje-opinion-26-assistive-technologyOpinion of the Council of Europe's judges' advisory body, adopted at its 24th plenary in December 2023, on technology including AI in courts. It holds that technology must assist and not replace judicial decision-making, that judges should be involved in decisions to adopt tools, and that they should be kept up to date on technological innovation through training. Primary source: CCJE — Final — https://rm.coe.int/ccje-opinion-no-26-2023-final/1680adade7Fri, 01 Dec 2023 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-oecd-recommendation-aihttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-oecd-recommendation-aiDefinition later adopted by the EU AI Act and the Ciarb arbitration guideline. Non-binding OECD standard adopted in 2019 and revised on 3 May 2024, setting five values-based principles: inclusive growth; respect for the rule of law, human rights and democratic values including fairness and privacy; transparency and explainability; robustness, security and safety; and accountability. Its AI-system definition is used by the EU AI Act. Primary source: OECD — Revised definition of AI system — https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449Wed, 08 Nov 2023 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-oecd-recommendation-aihttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-oecd-recommendation-aiNon-binding OECD standard adopted in 2019 and revised on 3 May 2024, setting five values-based principles: inclusive growth; respect for the rule of law, human rights and democratic values including fairness and privacy; transparency and explainability; robustness, security and safety; and accountability. Its AI-system definition is used by the EU AI Act. Primary source: OECD — Original — https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternationalhttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-cepej-european-ethical-charter-ai-judicial-systemshttps://safelegalai.com/regulation/international/int-cepej-european-ethical-charter-ai-judicial-systemsAdopted by CEPEJ on 3-4 December 2018, the Charter sets five principles for AI in judicial systems: respect for fundamental rights, non-discrimination, quality and security, transparency, impartiality and fairness, and use under user control. It is addressed to policy makers, legislators and justice professionals and underpins CEPEJ's later assessment tool and generative-AI guidelines. Primary source: CEPEJ — Adopted at the 31st plenary — https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699cTue, 04 Dec 2018 00:00:00 GMTregulationinternational