<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>SafeLegalAI — watch: New Zealand</title><description>Court incidents, official rule revisions and analysis in New Zealand, as they enter the record. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.</description><link>https://safelegalai.com</link><language>en-gb</language><copyright>CC BY 4.0 — SafeLegalAI, published by Cognesio LLP</copyright><item><title>Rule revised · NZ Law Society: Generative AI guidance for lawyers — February 2026 update</title><link>https://safelegalai.com/regulation/nz/nzls-generative-ai-guidance-lawyers</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://safelegalai.com/regulation/nz/nzls-generative-ai-guidance-lawyers</guid><description>Updated guidance on verification, privacy and privilege, client communication and fee review; first published in 2024. Guidance from the New Zealand Law Society, updated 24 February 2026, on how the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act rules apply to generative AI. Lawyers must verify all output, protect privacy and privilege when entering information, disclose AI use to clients where appropriate, and review whether fees remain reasonable when AI reduces the time spent. Primary source: NZ Law Society — February 2026 update — https://www.lawsociety.org.nz/professional-practice/rules-and-maintaining-professional-standards/generative-ai-guidance-for-lawyers/</description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>regulation</category><category>nz</category></item><item><title>Incident · New Zealand: Jones v Family Court at Whangārei [2026] NZSC 1</title><link>https://safelegalai.com/tracker/jones-v-family-court-whangarei</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://safelegalai.com/tracker/jones-v-family-court-whangarei</guid><description>New Zealand&apos;s Supreme Court dismissed a self-represented litigant&apos;s leave application after his submissions cited hallucinated authorities from an AI application — real case names with wrong citations and misattributed cases. The Court awarded NZ$500 costs and warned that reliance on unverified AI outputs may, in serious cases, amount to obstruction of justice or contempt of court. Primary source: Jones v Family Court at Whangārei [2026] NZSC 1 (SC167/2025) — Courts of New Zealand (official judgment PDF) — https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/assets/cases/2026/2026-NZSC-1.pdf</description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>incident</category><category>nz</category></item><item><title>Rule · NZ Law Society: Generative AI guidance for lawyers — Original (2024)</title><link>https://safelegalai.com/regulation/nz/nzls-generative-ai-guidance-lawyers</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://safelegalai.com/regulation/nz/nzls-generative-ai-guidance-lawyers</guid><description>Guidance from the New Zealand Law Society, updated 24 February 2026, on how the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act rules apply to generative AI. Lawyers must verify all output, protect privacy and privilege when entering information, disclose AI use to clients where appropriate, and review whether fees remain reasonable when AI reduces the time spent. Primary source: NZ Law Society — Original (2024) — https://www.lawsociety.org.nz/professional-practice/rules-and-maintaining-professional-standards/generative-ai-guidance-for-lawyers/</description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>regulation</category><category>nz</category></item><item><title>Rule · Courts of New Zealand: Guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in Courts and Tribunals</title><link>https://safelegalai.com/regulation/nz/nz-courts-generative-ai-guidelines</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://safelegalai.com/regulation/nz/nz-courts-generative-ai-guidelines</guid><description>Three sets of guidelines issued by the Chief Justice of New Zealand on 7 December 2023 for judges, lawyers and non-lawyers using generative AI in courts and tribunals. Existing duties continue to apply, users must verify all AI output and protect confidential information, and there is no mandatory disclosure of AI use. The guidelines remain unchanged as of September 2026. Primary source: Courts of New Zealand — Original — https://www.courtsofnz.govt.nz/going-to-court/practice-directions/practice-guidelines/all-benches/guidelines-for-use-of-generative-artificial-intelligence-in-courts-and-tribunals</description><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>regulation</category><category>nz</category></item><item><title>Rule · NZ Privacy Commissioner: Artificial Intelligence and the Information Privacy Principles</title><link>https://safelegalai.com/regulation/nz/nz-opc-ai-information-privacy-principles</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://safelegalai.com/regulation/nz/nz-opc-ai-information-privacy-principles</guid><description>The New Zealand Privacy Commissioner&apos;s expectations for agencies using generative AI under the Privacy Act 2020, published 21 September 2023 with a companion page on generative AI. The Office approves or endorses no AI technology or provider and expects a privacy assessment before an agency uses an AI tool on personal information. Primary source: NZ Privacy Commissioner — Original — https://www.privacy.org.nz/resources-and-learning/a-z-topics/ai/</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>regulation</category><category>nz</category></item></channel></rss>