About SafeLegalAI
SafeLegalAI is the global record of what happens when AI goes wrong in legal practice — every incident, and what courts and regulators did about it. We publish the Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, a weekly briefing, regulatory guidance tracking, and independent tool safety assessments.
Ownership, plainly
SafeLegalAI is published by the team behind LegalAI Space, a commercial AI governance product for law firms. We tell you this at the top of the page, not the bottom, because our readers assess risk for a living and deserve the full picture.
What that means in practice — rules we hold ourselves to:
- LegalAI Space is never reviewed or scored on this site. Not favourably, not unfavourably — never.
- We record findings made by courts and regulators — we don't make them. Tracker entries state what the judgment or disciplinary body said, with the primary source linked.
- Every article mentioning LegalAI Space or its competitors carries a disclosure block.
- We don't claim to be "independent". We claim things you can check: methodology published, corrections public, sources linked, funding disclosed.
How this is made
SafeLegalAI is produced with heavy AI assistance and human editorial accountability. AI does research, drafting, and data work; a named human editor verifies every quote, case citation, and statistic against primary sources before anything publishes, and owns what you read. Full pipeline on the editorial standardspage. AI-generated illustrations are labelled as such.
Corrections
We correct errors within 24 hours of confirming them, with a dated, visible correction note on the piece — never a silent edit. Spotted something? Email hello@safelegalai.com.
Tips
Seen an AI incident in a courtroom or a regulator's docket? Tell us: hello@safelegalai.com. We verify against primary sources before anything enters the tracker.