Analysis
AI-assisted coverage. Edited and verified by Cognesio LLP; primary sources are linked in every article.
Featured research
Research·Report
As of 7 Sep 2026: 129 records across the 27 Member States, plus 18 in EEA, Switzerland and the UK; 9 Member State acts are in force.
Archive 59
BriefsGuidance diff
6 min read
What changed when the State Bar of California replaced its November 2023 generative-AI guidance with the 2026 revision covering agentic AI.
BriefsExplainer
4 min read
The regulation map records 76 reviewed country answers on client data in AI tools: binding rules, guidance, proposals and gaps.
NewsNews brief
2 min read
Florida's Fourth District ordered counsel to explain suspected AI-generated filings in a family-law writ case, with possible sanctions or bar referral.
BriefsWeekly briefing
6 min read
Issue 2: the SDT's first AI-citation case, 476 US court rows on record, California SB 574 with the Governor, Germany, Poland and Ireland AI Act laws.
NewsNews brief
2 min read
The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal struck Abhishek Kumar off the register after AI-generated false citations appeared in his defence to SRA proceedings.
NewsNews brief
updated
6 min read
Passed 31 Aug and enrolled 4 Sep 2026, SB 574 would bar delegating law practice to AI, require citation checks and court disclosure, and bind arbitrators.
ResearchReport
22 min read
As of 7 Sep 2026: 129 records across the 27 Member States, plus 18 in EEA, Switzerland and the UK; 9 Member State acts are in force.
ResearchReport
26 min read
337 dated first-party statements: 66 feature releases, 46 named deployments, 13 model disclosures, 9 acquisitions, 5 funding announcements.
ResearchReport
24 min read
41 verified US bills and laws as of 7 Sep 2026: 10 in force, 23 pending, 8 not advanced, with court and legal-practice duties.
ResearchReport
updated
26 min read
As of 8 Sep 2026, 566 US court documents on generative AI and related AI questions show 507 fabricated-citation rulings.
ResearchReport
31 min read
595 official justice-sector AI records in 17 jurisdiction codes: 351 DOJ rows, 98 Brazil rows and 31 Netherlands rows as of 7 September 2026.
ResearchReport
33 min read
17 rulings and opinions on AI privilege, discovery and AI-generated evidence, 2024 to 2026, coded by question, plus what five note-taker vendors say they keep.
ResearchComparison
36 min read
46 binding court instruments and 130 country records on one schema: 6 countries bind filers to disclose or certify, 10 to verify, most say nothing.
ResearchReport
35 min read
150 tracker rows, 45 with a stated figure: USD 371,542 across 34 US orders, median USD 5,000; 48 regulator referrals, 5 verified dispositions.
ResearchReport
25 min read
12 consumer legal-AI services on one schema, 41 self-represented rows in the incident tracker, two docket studies of AI pro se filings, and the regulators.
ResearchReport
35 min read
Every AI Act duty that reaches a law firm or legal-AI vendor, dated after Regulation 2026/1744: 5 in force, 6 deferred to 2027, 27 national enforcers mapped.
ResearchReport
25 min read
106 instruments on judges' AI use and 11 decisions where an adjudicator relied on fabricated authority: 10 countries bind judges, 22 guide, 6 are drafting.
ResearchReport
26 min read
India searches 'legal ai' 8,100 times a month against 9,900 in the US; its courts have acted on eight matters built on fake authority; its rulebook is in draft.
ResearchReport
24 min read
Ten Semrush keyword sets, 998 rows, US and UK: brand and vendor-comparison queries dominate; incident, error-rate and dated-regulation queries go unserved.
ResearchReport
updated
25 min read
48 matters before regulators in 7 countries: 5 dispositions verified from the regulator's own document (7 rows), 4 reported, 36 open; the fastest took 104 days.
ResearchReport
35 min read
A dataset-first report on AI rules for lawyers and courts across 130 records, with provisional countries separated from checked counts.
NewsNews brief
2 min read
The D.C. Court of Appeals struck a Deutsche Bank appellee brief after counsel used Google's generative AI search tool without verifying four nonexistent cases.
NewsNews brief
2 min read
The Supreme Court of India set aside a Rs 425.28 crore customs penalty after finding fake or misused AI-generated authorities in the order.
NewsNews brief
2 min read
A 2 September 2026 Mahkamah Agung letter circulates draft criminal-code judgment templates and bars uploading the drafts to AI services.
ResearchAnalysis
5 min read
A C.D. Cal. Special Master sanctioned Ellis George and K&L Gates $31,100 after an AI-drafted brief cited fake cases and was re-filed without disclosure.
NewsNews brief
2 min read
The Virginia Court of Appeals ordered counsel to take AI or appellate-practice CLE after an appellee brief attributed 25 phantom quotations to Virginia cases.
BriefsExplainer
4 min read
The regulation map records 39 country answers on judicial AI use: binding rules, guidance, proposals and one case-law answer.
BriefsExplainer
4 min read
Across 130 country records, 50 have a binding, guidance, proposed or case-law answer on verification of AI output.
ResearchAnalysis
6 min read
Sullivan & Cromwell disclosed AI-hallucinated citations in a Chapter 15 emergency motion in April 2026. The letter, the 28-citation count, and the docket since.
ResearchAnalysis
8 min read
EU AI Act, July to August 2026: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 in force, high-risk duties deferred to 2027 and 2028, Article 50 and GPAI enforcement live.
ResearchReport
13 min read
1 July to 3 September 2026: 54 tracker incidents in 11 jurisdictions, USD 132,888 in stated US penalties, 20 rows with a regulator referral or disposition.
ResearchAnalysis
11 min read
Summer 2026 reviewed: the SRA's AI warning notice, Ireland's mandatory AI declaration in civil filings and the EU's deferred high-risk AI Act duties.
BriefsWeekly briefing
6 min read
Issue 1: 50 incidents added, the SRA's misuse-of-AI warning notice, Ireland's Practice Direction HC 142, deferred EU high-risk duties, 128 tools on record.
BriefsGuidance diff
3 min read
Australian regulator guidance on generative AI — Queensland's Guidance Statement 37, the three-regulator joint statement, and the NSW solicitor's guide.
ResearchAnalysis
3 min read
England's Divisional Court referred two lawyers to their regulators over AI-fabricated citations and warned its restraint on contempt is not a precedent.
BriefsGuidance diff
2 min read
The version record of Canadian law-society generative-AI guidance — LSBC (2023), the LSO white paper (2024), Alberta's Rules of Engagement, and the CBA toolkit.
ResearchAnalysis
3 min read
Oregon's ~$110,000 AI-sanctions case: terminating sanctions for fifteen fake cases and eight fabricated quotations, and why the headline figure is an aggregate.
ResearchAnalysis
3 min read
A solicitor filed four AI-invented authorities; the court's referral led the regulator to bar him as a principal and impose two years' supervision.
BriefsExplainer
3 min read
The EU AI Act can reach a UK firm when its AI output is used in the EU. What the extraterritorial scope, the AI-literacy duty, and the deferred deadlines mean.
ResearchReport
updated
7 min read
A dated, primary-sourced timeline infographic of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689: entry into force, the phased application dates and the Digital Omnibus deferrals.
ResearchAnalysis
3 min read
The first reported UK case of AI-invented case law: a litigant cited nine ChatGPT-fabricated decisions to the Tax Tribunal, which found them fake.
ResearchReport
updated
17 min read
Every published measurement of legal-AI error on one schema, set against the vendor claims: 17% to 33% for research tools, 43% to 88% for general models.
BriefsGuidance diff
3 min read
The Law Society of Ireland's GenAI guidelines, the Judicial Council's guidelines for judges, and the Court of Appeal's five principles — dated and sourced.
ResearchAnalysis
4 min read
An Ontario lawyer filed a ChatGPT-fabricated factum, then lied about writing it — and drew a criminal-contempt referral to the Attorney General.
ResearchReport
updated
24 min read
Every 2024 to 2026 survey of AI in legal practice on one schema: adoption runs 30% to 92% depending on who asked; 43% of firms have no policy, 54% no training.
BriefsExplainer
3 min read
Plain-English definitions courts use when sanctioning AI-fabricated citations: hallucination, Hamid jurisdiction, wasted costs, Rule 11, and more.
NewsRoundup
3 min read
The judgments, court rules, regulator guidance, and research worth reading first on AI in legal practice — annotated and grouped by who needs them.
ResearchAnalysis
3 min read
In Cork v Smith, a junior solicitor's AI tool fabricated the text of a rule that does not exist. Pinsent Masons self-referred to the SRA.
ResearchAnalysis
2 min read
India's Supreme Court set aside two tribunal orders built on fake AI-generated precedents and ordered the Bar Council to frame AI rules for lawyers.
BriefsGuidance diff
3 min read
Singapore's legal AI guidance, dated and sourced: the Supreme Court's 2024 circular, the Ministry of Law's 2026 sector guide, and the Law Society advisory.
ResearchAnalysis
2 min read
South Africa's Legal Practice Council has published no guidance on lawyers' AI use — so its courts are referring practitioners to it instead, case by case.
ResearchReport
4 min read
From Mata v Avianca to a $110,000 Oregon sanction: what the verified record of AI-fabricated citations shows about courts, regulators, and the firms involved.
BriefsGuidance diff
3 min read
AI guidance in India (Kerala), Brazil (CNJ Res. 615), Hong Kong, and the Gulf (QFC) — judicial and regulator documents beyond the big jurisdictions.
BriefsGuidance diff
3 min read
How the Courts and Tribunals Judiciary's AI guidance for judges in England and Wales changed across three versions: Dec 2023, April 2025, and 31 October 2025.
BriefsGuidance diff
3 min read
The version record of the SRA, Bar Council, and Law Society guidance on generative AI — what each says now, and when it changed.
ResearchReport
updated
28 min read
As of 16 Sep 2026, 268 US court AI instruments show certification, disclosure, verification and no-disclosure policies.
ResearchAnalysis
2 min read
Two New York attorneys, six ChatGPT-invented cases, and a $5,000 sanction: the June 2023 ruling that created the legal AI hallucination era.
BriefsExplainer
2 min read
New South Wales runs the strictest AI court rule in the common-law world: affidavits must declare AI was NOT used. Here is what the practice note requires.
BriefsWeekly briefing
1 min read
A sample issue showing the weekly format: incidents worldwide, regulator watch, one analysis take, and the tracker stat of the week.
No cards match those filters. Clear the filters, or open a segment page to browse the full archive.
