Report
35 min read
AI in legal practice: what 130 country records require at September 2026
A dataset-first report on AI rules for lawyers and courts across 130 records, with provisional countries separated from checked counts.
Analysis
News, briefs and research on AI in legal practice
AI-assisted coverage. Edited and verified by Cognesio LLP; primary sources are linked in every article.
Topic 4
AI Governance
Governance failures, frameworks in practice, and accountability news.
Analysis
11 min read
Summer 2026 in legal AI regulation: SRA warning notice, mandatory Irish declaration and a deferred EU Act
Summer 2026 reviewed: the SRA's AI warning notice, Ireland's mandatory AI declaration in civil filings and the EU's deferred high-risk AI Act duties.
United KingdomIrelandEuropean UnionIndiaUnited States (state)South AfricaGLOBALAI GovernanceSRA & UK RegulationEU AI ActAI in CourtsRead →
Report
3 min read
Legal AI by the numbers: adoption, training, and the governance gap
Verified figures on AI in legal practice — UNESCO's 44% use vs 9% trained, the IBA's 57% cross-border, ILTA's 80% GenAI, and CLOC's 30% in-house.
Analysis
2 min read
South Africa's regulator vacuum: courts doing the LPC's job on AI
South Africa's Legal Practice Council has published no guidance on lawyers' AI use — so its courts are referring practitioners to it instead, case by case.
South AfricaAI GovernanceAI in CourtsRead →
Topic 11
AI Hallucinations
Fabricated citations, invented cases, and the sanctions that follow — tracked worldwide.
Report
13 min read
Legal AI incident report, Q3 2026 to 3 September: 54 incidents, 33 in US courts, 20 regulator outcomes
1 July to 3 September 2026: 54 tracker incidents in 11 jurisdictions, USD 132,888 in stated US penalties, 20 rows with a regulator referral or disposition.
Analysis
3 min read
Ayinde and Al-Haroun: England's Divisional Court sets the rule on AI-fabricated citations
England's Divisional Court referred two lawyers to their regulators over AI-fabricated citations and warned its restraint on contempt is not a precedent.
United KingdomAI HallucinationsAI in CourtsRead →
Analysis
3 min read
The $110,000 Oregon AI-sanctions case, and what the coverage got wrong
Oregon's ~$110,000 AI-sanctions case: terminating sanctions for fifteen fake cases and eight fabricated quotations, and why the headline figure is an aggregate.
USAI HallucinationsAI in CourtsRead →
Analysis
3 min read
Dayal: the first time an AI misuse referral reshaped a lawyer's right to practise
A solicitor filed four AI-invented authorities; the court's referral led the regulator to bar him as a principal and impose two years' supervision.
AustraliaAI HallucinationsAI GovernanceRead →
Analysis
3 min read
Harber v HMRC: the first reported UK case of AI-invented case law
The first reported UK case of AI-invented case law: a litigant cited nine ChatGPT-fabricated decisions to the Tax Tribunal, which found them fake.
United KingdomAI HallucinationsAI in CourtsRead →
Report
3 min read
How often does legal AI hallucinate? What the studies actually measured
Stanford's research on legal-AI hallucination rates: general models fabricate at least 58% of the time; dedicated legal-research tools, 17% to 33%.
Analysis
4 min read
Ko v. Li: how a ChatGPT factum became a criminal-contempt referral in Ontario
An Ontario lawyer filed a ChatGPT-fabricated factum, then lied about writing it — and drew a criminal-contempt referral to the Attorney General.
CanadaAI HallucinationsAI in CourtsRead →
Analysis
3 min read
Pinsent Masons self-referred to the SRA after AI invented an insolvency rule
In Cork v Smith, a junior solicitor's AI tool fabricated the text of a rule that does not exist. Pinsent Masons self-referred to the SRA.
United KingdomAI HallucinationsSRA & UK RegulationRead →
Analysis
2 min read
India's Supreme Court: a ruling built on AI-hallucinated cases is 'no decision in law'
India's Supreme Court set aside two tribunal orders built on fake AI-generated precedents and ordered the Bar Council to frame AI rules for lawyers.
IndiaAI HallucinationsAI in CourtsRead →
Report
4 min read
Three years of legal AI hallucinations: the record from 2023 to 2026
From Mata v Avianca to a $110,000 Oregon sanction: what the verified record of AI-fabricated citations shows about courts, regulators, and the firms involved.
Analysis
2 min read
Mata v Avianca: the case that started it all
Two New York attorneys, six ChatGPT-invented cases, and a $5,000 sanction — the June 2023 ruling that created the legal AI hallucination era.
USAI HallucinationsRead →
Topic 1
AI in Courts
Judicial guidance, AI evidence, deepfakes, and standing orders across jurisdictions.
Topic 2
EU AI Act
Deadlines, obligations, and enforcement of the EU AI Act as they hit legal practice.
Analysis
8 min read
EU AI Act update — September 2026: the Digital Omnibus is law and Article 50 applies
EU AI Act, July to August 2026: Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 in force, high-risk duties deferred to 2027 and 2028, Article 50 and GPAI enforcement live.
European UnionEU AI ActRead →
Report
updated
6 min read
The EU AI Act so far: every milestone from adoption to mid-2026
A dated, primary-sourced timeline of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689: entry into force, the phased application dates, and the Digital Omnibus deferrals.
European UnionEU AI ActRead →
No research matches those filters.