Skip to content

The record of AI in legal practice.

Maintained datasets for the people accountable when law firms and courts adopt AI — every record linked to its official source, every page stating when it was last checked.

CourtsWhat have courts done about AI?incidents
  1. Legal AI Incident Tracker173
  2. US court decisions on generative AI566
  3. AI-generated evidence and deepfakes in court60
RegulationWhat do the rules say, where?countries and entities
  1. Regulatory map130
  2. Official documents, versioned522
  3. EU AI Act, structured677
  4. EU AI Act — national implementation147
  5. All 8 regulation datasets→
Legal techWhat does each vendor document?tools
  1. Legal tech tools130
  2. Vendor documentation audit3480
  3. Legal-AI release and disclosure timeline341
ChangesWhat changed, and when?log entries
  1. Content log57

15 maintained datasets, each with its source, last-checked date and downloads — the catalogue →

Open the regulatory map Open the incident tracker

Regulatory map · overall coverage

last checked 2026-09-16

World map of legal AI regulation coverageCountries are coloured by overall regulatory coverage. Use the selector to recolour by a rule category. Faint land has no record yet.
ExtensiveSubstantialDevelopingEarlyNone found

102 of 130 countries have at least one rule, guidance or proposal on record · 186 binding positions. Hover a country for its status and last-checked date.Open the map →

Weekly briefing

Incident Tracker and Regulation Tracker

What went wrong+20 in 30 days

Incident Tracker

incidents
jurisdictions
regulatory outcomes

Every court case where AI misuse reached a judgment, and what the regulator did next. We record findings made by courts and regulators; we don't make them.

  1. 07 Oct 2026 ·US-STATE· sanctions

    Kid International

  2. 07 Oct 2026 ·US-STATE· dismissal

    Tapscott v. Fariss

  3. 07 Oct 2026 ·US-STATE· dismissal

    Washington v. Justice

  4. 02 Oct 2026 ·US-STATE· filing-struck

    Shannon v. Shannon

  5. 01 Oct 2026 ·OTHER· dismissal

    P. M. M. c/ G. A.

  6. 29 Sept 2026 ·US-FED· warning

    Hill v. Foundation Media LLC

  7. 28 Sept 2026 ·CA· dismissal

    Ahmed v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

  8. 25 Sept 2026 ·US-FED· sanctions

    Aguilar v. The Crawford Group
Open the tracker

StatisticsUKUS federalUS statesJSON

What the rules say+1 in 30 days

Regulation Tracker

countries mapped
official documents
versions tracked

Twenty kinds of rule, 130 countries, one map: who must disclose, who must verify, what judges may do, what evidence counts, where client data may go. Every cell says when we last checked.

Horizontal AI statute 35 bindingMandatory AI training 29 bindingTechnological competence 16 binding

  1. 30 Sept 2026 ·US-STATE · California Legislature

    California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators

  2. 06 Sept 2026 ·US-FED · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

    Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6

  3. 06 Sept 2026 ·US-FED · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

    Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence

  4. 06 Sept 2026 ·US-FED · Central District of California

    Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court

  5. 06 Sept 2026 ·US-FED · Central District of California (Judge Court)

    Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases

  6. 06 Sept 2026 ·US-FED · Central District of California (Judge Kato)

    Civil Standing Order
Open the map

Compare countriesUKUSEUDocuments

What the tools documentnot a ranking

Legal tech tools130

Training commitments, certifications, data residency, accuracy evidence and incidents on the record — each fact linked to the vendor page that states it. 77 publish a no-training commitment; 16 hold ISO 42001. Unknown stays unknown.

Browse all 130 tools

Analysis

News, briefs and research

All 68News 12Briefs 21Research 35
See all analysis

Reuse the data

All 15 datasets are CC BY 4.0, mirrored on GitHub and Hugging Face. Every record page carries a citation block and a last-checked date.

All datasetsEmbed a widgetSyndicateWatch a jurisdiction

How we work

Researched with AI assistance; edited and verified by SafeLegalAI against primary sources. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law. Every page says when it was last checked.

How this is madeEditorial standardsDisclaimer

Vendors

Listed in the legal tech record? Facts are recorded from your published pages, never negotiated. To correct a record or send documentation, write to hello@safelegalai.com with the record URL and the page that states the fact.