SerbiaSerbia has no dedicated AI law in force. CMS identifies the 2020-2025 and 2025-2030 AI strategies and 2023 Ethical Guidelines as non-binding horizontal policy; no formal public AI-law procedure was reported in February 2026.
Regulation Tracker · Country · Europe
Serbia
Early: one or two positionscivil lawupdated 2026-09-04researched 2026-09-04provisional
As of 4 September 2026 Serbia has no dedicated AI law, court rule, bar guidance or reported hallucinated-citation case for legal practice. AI governance rests on national AI strategies for 2020-2025 and 2025-2030, the voluntary 2023 Ethical Guidelines, existing data-protection law and preparations for future EU-aligned regulation.
As of 2026-09-04, Serbia has 0 binding rules, official guidance in 1 category, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. In 19 categories we found nothing; in 0 the position is not yet determined.
How to read this page
- Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
- Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
- Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
- Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
- Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
- Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.
The rules, category by category
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No Serbian Bar Association rule, ethics opinion or guidance on generative AI use by lawyers was located as of 4 September 2026.
Serbia operates a National AI Platform for development and public-sector use, but no published court AI deployment policy or judicial guidance was located.
Serbia's GDPR-aligned Personal Data Protection Law applies generally. No Commissioner guidance specifically addressing AI processing in legal services was located.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Official documents recorded for Serbia (0)
- No documents recorded yet; category sources link the official pages.
Court incidents on the record in Serbia
- Yichang District Court (Hubei)2026-07-21 Warning
Cite this page
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Serbia" (updated 2026-09-04, AI-researched, provisional 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/rs (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.