Skip to content

Incident Tracker / Other

Yichang District Court (Hubei), 'non-drug passed off as drug' criminal case (AI-fabricated defence materials)

·District court, Yichang City, Hubei Province·OTHERWarningunverified

In one of the first reported instances in China, a district court judge in Yichang, Hubei Province, checked the defence's reference materials and found AI-fabricated cases with fake China Judgments Online links and doctored judicial-interpretation text. The lawyer blamed an assistant's AI tool; the court admonished him in open court, stating AI cannot excuse submitting false materials.

Court
District court, Yichang City, Hubei Province
Date
2026-07-21
Who used the AI
Lawyer
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
A defence lawyer's assistant used an AI tool to compile reference materials containing fictitious cases with fake China Judgments Online links, real cases with invented holdings, a case number belonging to an unrelated bribery judgment, and altered text of a judicial interpretation.
Outcome
Warning
Penalty
No monetary penalty recorded
Regulatory outcome
No separate regulatory disposition recorded
Status
Unverified — pending primary-source confirmation
Last checked
2026-09-03

Primary sources for this incident

Related regulation records for this incident

No related regulation record has been linked to this incident yet.

Similar incidents on the record

  • P. M. M. c/ G. A., F. M. D. S.H. s/ cobro ordinario de sumas de dinero, Causa MO-14691-2021 (RS-722-2026)2026-10-01 · Cámara de Apelación en lo Civil y Comercial, Sala II, Departamento Judicial Morón (Buenos Aires Province) · DismissalIn Argentina, a Buenos Aires provincial appeals chamber in Morón declared a fee appeal deserted, with costs, because it rested on a Supreme Court precedent that could not be found. The court said likely AI hallucination…
  • Hill v. Foundation Media LLC, No. 1:25-cv-05947 (AS) (S.D.N.Y. 2026)2026-09-29 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York · WarningIn New York federal court, Judge Arun Subramanian ordered defence counsel to explain AI-affected quotations in a response brief, took no further action, and called the episode a wakeup call. Counsel's 1 October letter d…
  • G.P. v. Jose Hernandez Arevalo, No. C26-284-KKE (W.D. Wash.)2026-09-08 · US District Court, Western District of Washington · WarningIn the US District Court for the Western District of Washington, plaintiff's counsel cited a nonexistent federal case in briefing against Turo. Judge Evanson described the citation as likely AI-fabricated, compelled arb…
  • Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group, No. 2428 EDA 2025 (Pa. Super. Ct.)2026-08-27 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · WarningIn Pennsylvania, counsel for Paige and Ty Kiser cited a non-existent Superior Court decision, Com. v. Reid, for an appellate issue in a consumer dispute. The Superior Court called the authority counterfeit, suggested ch…

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, “Yichang District Court (Hubei), 'non-drug passed off as drug' criminal case (AI-fabricated defence materials)”, safelegalai.com/tracker/yichang-fake-drug-case (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.

Report an issue with this record →