Skip to content

Justice-sector AI

Where courts and justice bodies use AI, on the record

What courts, judiciaries, prosecutors, public defenders, legal-aid bodies and justice ministries themselves have put on the record about the AI they use: entries in official AI-use inventories, algorithmic-transparency records, procurement notices and awards, announcements and pilot reports, judgments in which a court says it used a tool, and judicial-conduct opinions on judges' AI use. The status of each record — pilot, deployed, retired, awarded — is the source's own word on the date we read it. Rules that courts impose on litigants are in the regulation tracker; this is the adjudicator's side.

compiled by the Cognesio LLP editorial teammethodas of 2026-09-07v0.1.1coding CC BY 4.0US federal records public domain; UK OGL v3; EU reuse; others quoted ≤25 wordsJSON Hugging Face GitHubthe report: 595 official records

595
official records
17
countries
153
bodies
185
generative-AI records
4
judgments disclosing judicial AI use

What the record showsas of 2026-09-07

Counts and shares computed from the dataset at build time. They describe what the record contains; they do not rank, evaluate or advise.

By country

By body

Each body page lists every record we hold for it, newest first.

BodyTypeCountryRecords
U.S. Department of Justice — Drug Enforcement AdministrationPolice and forensicsUnited States55
U.S. Department of Justice — Federal Bureau of InvestigationPolice and forensicsUnited States48
U.S. Department of Justice — Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ExplosivesPolice and forensicsUnited States39
U.S. Department of Justice — Federal Bureau of PrisonsCorrections and probationUnited States38
U.S. Department of Justice — Department-wideJustice ministryUnited States20
U.S. Department of Justice — United States Marshals ServicePolice and forensicsUnited States18
U.S. Department of Justice — Civil DivisionProsecution serviceUnited States17
U.S. Department of Homeland Security — U.S. Citizenship and Immigration ServicesTribunal or adjudicatorUnited States16
U.S. Department of Justice — Tax DivisionProsecution serviceUnited States14
U.S. Department of Justice — Antitrust DivisionProsecution serviceUnited States10
U.S. Department of Justice — Justice Management Division / Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task ForcesOther justice agencyUnited States10
U.S. Department of Justice — Office of the Inspector GeneralOther justice agencyUnited States9
U.S. Department of Justice — Executive Office for Immigration ReviewTribunal or adjudicatorUnited States8
U.S. Department of Justice — Justice Management DivisionOther justice agencyUnited States8
Ministry of JusticeJustice ministryUnited Kingdom7
Nederlands Forensisch InstituutPolice and forensicsNetherlands7
U.S. Department of Justice — Civil Rights DivisionProsecution serviceUnited States7
U.S. Department of Justice — Executive Office for United States AttorneysProsecution serviceUnited States7
U.S. Department of Justice — Office of Justice ProgramsOther justice agencyUnited States7
PolitiePolice and forensicsNetherlands6
Raad voor de KinderbeschermingOther justice agencyNetherlands6
U.S. Department of Justice — Office of the Pardon AttorneyCorrections and probationUnited States6
Ministerie van Justitie en VeiligheidJustice ministryNetherlands5
Ministerio de la Presidencia, Justicia y Relaciones con las CortesJustice ministrySpain5
Social Security Administration — Office of Analytics, Review, and OversightTribunal or adjudicatorUnited States5
U.S. Department of Justice — Criminal DivisionProsecution serviceUnited States5
U.S. Department of Justice — Environment and Natural Resources DivisionProsecution serviceUnited States5
U.S. Department of Justice — Office of Public AffairsOther justice agencyUnited States5
His Majesty's Prison and Probation ServiceCorrections and probationUnited Kingdom4
Supreme Court of India RegistryCourtIndia4
U.S. Department of Justice — United States National Central BureauPolice and forensicsUnited States4
United Arab Emirates Ministry of JusticeJustice ministryUnited Arab Emirates4
Arizona Supreme CourtJudiciaryUnited States3
Centre of Registers and Information SystemsCourt administrationEstonia3
Dienst Justitiële InrichtingenCorrections and probationNetherlands3
HM Courts & Tribunals ServiceCourt administrationUnited Kingdom3
Raad voor RechtsbijstandLegal aid bodyNetherlands3
Social Security Administration — Office of the Chief Information OfficerTribunal or adjudicatorUnited States3
Supreme People's CourtCourtChina3
TJCECourtBrazil3
TJGOCourtBrazil3
TJMATribunal or adjudicatorBrazil3
TJPACourtBrazil3
TJRJCourtBrazil3
TJRNCourtBrazil3
TJRSCourtBrazil3
TJSPCourtBrazil3
TRE-PATribunal or adjudicatorBrazil3
TRF1Tribunal or adjudicatorBrazil3
TRT9Tribunal or adjudicatorBrazil3
Connecticut Judicial BranchJudiciaryUnited States2
Conselho Nacional de JustiçaCourt administrationBrazil2
DomstoladministrasjonenCourt administrationNorway2
Eleventh Judicial Circuit of FloridaCourtUnited States2
Illinois Supreme CourtJudiciaryUnited States2
Singapore Small Claims TribunalsTribunal or adjudicatorSingapore2
Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCourtUnited States2
Superior Tribunal de JustiçaCourtBrazil2
Supremo Tribunal FederalCourtBrazil2
The Probation ServiceCorrections and probationUnited Kingdom2

Latest announcements, awards and judgments

Inventory entries are listed on the body pages; here are the dated records.

  1. Anonymization of court rulings

    · Centre of Registers and Information Systems · Official announcement · Document automation · status as stated: currently used

    The RIK AI solutions page lists anonymization of court rulings as a currently used AI solution. It says an automatic processing engine recognises personal data and anonymises it before court decisions are published.

  2. Automated labeling and analysis of court documents

    · Centre of Registers and Information Systems · Official announcement · NLP / classification · status as stated: started using

    The RIK AI solutions page says the centre has started using automated labelling and anonymisation to improve data quality in court documents. It says court-document analysis can cover crime-event text, qualifications, subjects, objects and addresses for statistics and similar-case search.

  3. Automated transcription of court hearings

    · Centre of Registers and Information Systems · Official announcement · Transcription · status as stated: currently used

    Estonia’s Centre of Registers and Information Systems lists automated transcription of court hearings among currently used AI solutions. The page says speech and voice recognition software transcribes shorthand hearing reports from real-time and stored audio recordings for protocol preparation.

  4. Identity recognition in e-Notary transactions

    · Estonian e-Notary portal · Official announcement · Analytics · status as stated: currently used

    The RIK AI solutions page lists identity recognition in notary legal transactions as a currently used AI solution. It says the e-Notary portal offers face-recognition identity verification and document validation for remote notarial transactions, with exceptions for marriage and divorce.

  5. Face recognition in prisoner e-services

    · Estonian prisons · Official announcement · Analytics · status as stated: currently used

    The RIK AI solutions page lists face recognition in prisoner e-services as a currently used AI solution. It says prisons can use hand-held devices with face-recognition software so prisoners can access personal data and digital court files and file appeals more efficiently.

  6. Website chatbot assistant for Clerk’s Office questions

    · U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina · Official announcement · Chatbot · status as stated: now provides

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina announced that its website now provides a chatbot to assist the public with common Clerk’s Office questions and information. The chatbot is available from the court homepage.

  7. CourtHelp traffic services expansion

    · Superior Court of Los Angeles County · Official announcement · Chatbot · status as stated: expected to launch on August 17, 2026

    Los Angeles Superior Court expanded CourtHelp with traffic services for citation lookup, payments, payment plans, traffic school, extensions and hearing requests. The release describes CourtHelp as the court’s AI-driven virtual assistant for navigating services and information.

  8. Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System final report

    · Connecticut Judicial Branch · Internal policy · Generative AI · status as stated: Final Report

    Connecticut’s Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System reports that the Judicial Branch established an internal AI committee and review subcommittee. The report summarizes generative AI rulemaking and frames future AI initiatives around independence, fairness, transparency, accountability and human oversight.

  9. OPG Investigations AI Assistant

    · Office of the Public Guardian · Transparency record · Document automation · status as stated: pre-deployment

    The GOV.UK Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard entry lists Office of the Public Guardian's OPG Investigations AI Assistant at phase "pre-deployment". The record says: The Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) plays a vital role in protecting individuals who may lack the mental capacity to make decisions about their health and.

  10. AI trial-listing support tool

    · HM Courts & Tribunals Service · Official announcement · Analytics · status as stated: new AI tool

    A Ministry of Justice announcement says a new AI tool will assist judges in listing trials and getting cases heard sooner for victims. The source presents the listing tool as part of a set of technology projects intended to address criminal court delays.

  11. AI legal assistants for justice staff and professionals

    · Ministry of Justice · Official announcement · Generative AI · status as stated: to be developed and tested

    A Ministry of Justice announcement says AI legal assistants will be developed and tested to speed up justice and cut delays. The source says the projects will be developed with legal experts and AI developers, alongside case-management changes intended to move cases faster.

  12. Justice Transcribe

    · The Probation Service · Official announcement · Transcription · status as stated: equipped

    A Ministry of Justice announcement says every probation officer in England and Wales has been equipped with Justice Transcribe. The source describes it as an AI tool that records and transcribes conversations with offenders so officers spend less time transferring handwritten notes into digital systems.

  13. AI court transcript study

    · HM Courts & Tribunals Service · Official announcement · Transcription · status as stated: new study will explore

    A Ministry of Justice announcement says HMCTS will lead a new study into AI court transcripts. The source says the study will explore how AI can transcribe court hearings and could provide faster and cheaper access to court records for victims and others.

  14. CourtHelp generative AI virtual assistant

    · Superior Court of Los Angeles County · Official announcement · Generative AI · status as stated: Launched on July 1, 2025

    The Los Angeles Superior Court announced that CourtHelp, launched July 1, 2025, is a generative AI virtual assistant on its website. It gives real-time guidance about court services, procedures and resources using court and Judicial Council information.

  15. Marshall self-help chatbot

    · Virginia Judicial System Court Self-Help · Official announcement · Chatbot · status as stated: Last updated on February 10, 2026

    The Virginia Judicial System Court Self-Help site publishes a page titled “Try our chatbot, Marshall!” for self-represented litigants. The page says Marshall was developed with Virginia Law Foundation funding and appears in the court self-help portal.

How this is made

Machine-readable official inventories first (the US Department of Justice AI Use Case Inventory, UK Algorithmic Transparency Records, Brazil's CNJ judiciary survey), then procurement portals filtered to justice bodies, then court and ministry announcements, judgments and judicial-conduct opinions. Council of Europe (CEPEJ), NCSC and incident databases were leads only; every row is re-sourced to an official page. Values are as published and never summed across currencies. Repository and schema.