Skip to content

Regulation Tracker

The regulatory map of AI in legal practice

130 countries and entities scored across the 20 kinds of rule the world is adopting for AI in law: who must disclose, who must verify, what judges may do, what evidence counts, where client data may go. Every cell states its status, cites the official document and shows when it was last checked. 54 records are provisional — researched with AI and awaiting the editor's source-by-source check; they are tagged wherever they appear.

ExtensiveSubstantialDevelopingEarly: one or two positionsChecked: no rules found
World map of legal AI regulation coverageCountries are coloured by overall regulatory coverage. Use the selector to recolour by a rule category. Faint land has no record yet.

Tap or hover a country. Faint land has no record yet. Miller projection; boundaries as published by Natural Earth (India point of view) — see the disclaimer.

Beyond national borders

European UnionRules that bind all 27 member states: the AI Act's justice-use classification, CCBE guidance, CEPEJ… — 13 positions on recordSee EU-level rules →International bodiesUN, OECD, Council of Europe, IBA, arbitration institutions… — 17 positions on recordSee international rules →
130
countries and entities mapped
179
binding rules recorded
324
official documents
368
versions tracked
2026-09-04
most recent verification

as of 2026-09-04 · country records verified between 2026-09-04 and 2026-09-04methodologymap.jsondocuments.jsonCC BY 4.0

What the world requires

20 questions, 128 countries.

Twenty regulatory questions, asked directly. Each bar shows how many countries answer with a binding rule, official guidance, a proposal, case law only, nothing found, or a position we have not yet determined. Expand a row for the countries behind each segment.

Binding ruleOfficial guidanceProposed / consultationSet by case lawNothing foundNot yet determined
Does a horizontal AI law classify legal or justice uses?

34 binding · 21 guidance · 31 proposed · 0 case-law · 35 none · 7 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule34

AustriaBelgiumBulgariaprovisionalChinaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItalyJapanKazakhstanprovisionalLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsPeruPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaprovisionalSlovakiaSloveniaSouth KoreaSpainSwedenTaiwan

Official guidance21

AzerbaijanprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCôte d'IvoireprovisionalEgyptEthiopiaprovisionalIndiaIraqprovisionalJordanprovisionalMauritiusprovisionalMoldovaprovisionalOmanprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalTanzaniaprovisionalThailandTunisiaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Proposed / consultation31

AlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAustraliaBahrainBelarusprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBrazilChileColombiaGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaIcelandIndonesiaIranprovisionalKenyaKuwaitMalaysiaMexicoMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayPhilippinesSwitzerlandTürkiyeUgandaprovisionalVietnam

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found35

AfghanistanprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCanadaCubaprovisionalDominican RepublicEl SalvadorprovisionalGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalHong Kong SARIsraelJamaicaprovisionalKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLebanonprovisionalMacaoprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalParaguayprovisionalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarSingaporeSouth AfricaSri LankaTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisional

Not yet determined7

ArgentinaBangladeshCosta RicaEcuadorNew ZealandPakistanPanama
Do data-protection rules specifically govern legal AI?

11 binding · 32 guidance · 4 proposed · 0 case-law · 68 none · 13 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule11

BahrainColombiaEgyptIndonesiaKazakhstanprovisionalKuwaitMalaysiaNigeriaPhilippinesSaudi ArabiaUnited Arab Emirates

Official guidance32

ArgentinaAustraliaAustriaBelgiumCanadaCroatiaDenmarkEstoniaFranceGermanyGreeceHong Kong SARHungaryIcelandIsraelJapanLuxembourgMauritiusprovisionalMoroccoNetherlandsNew ZealandNorwayOmanprovisionalSingaporeSloveniaSouth KoreaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandThailandTürkiyeUnited Kingdom

Proposed / consultation4

BrazilNamibiaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalZambiaprovisional

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found68

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileChinaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCubaprovisionalCzechiaDominican RepublicEcuadorEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIndiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalItalyJamaicaprovisionalJordanprovisionalKenyaKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLebanonprovisionalMacaoprovisionalMaltaMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNorth MacedoniaprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSri LankaTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUnited StatesUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined13

BangladeshCyprusFinlandIrelandLatviaLithuaniaPolandPortugalRomaniaSlovakiaSouth AfricaUruguayVietnam
Does competence include understanding AI risks?

15 binding · 23 guidance · 1 proposed · 0 case-law · 87 none · 2 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule15

BulgariaprovisionalCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandGermanyHungaryLatviaLithuaniaPhilippinesPolandRomaniaSlovakiaSpainSweden

Official guidance23

ArgentinaAustraliaAustriaBelgiumBrazilCanadaFranceHong Kong SARIndonesiaIrelandIsraelItalyLuxembourgMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaNorwaySingaporeSwitzerlandTürkiyeUnited KingdomUnited States

Proposed / consultation1

South Africa

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found87

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLebanonprovisionalMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth KoreaSri LankaTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined2

ThailandVietnam
Must legal AI vendors pass procurement due diligence?

12 binding · 26 guidance · 1 proposed · 0 case-law · 83 none · 6 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule12

AustriaBrazilChinaColombiaFinlandGermanyIndiaItalyNepalPhilippinesSlovakiaSpain

Official guidance26

AustraliaBahrainBelgiumCanadaCroatiaDenmarkEstoniaFranceHong Kong SARIrelandIsraelLuxembourgMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaNorwayPolandPortugalSingaporeSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanTürkiyeUnited KingdomUnited States

Proposed / consultation1

South Africa

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found83

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNicaraguaprovisionalNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth KoreaSri LankaTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined6

CzechiaHungaryIndonesiaRomaniaThailandVietnam
Can lawyers put client data into AI tools?

7 binding · 31 guidance · 2 proposed · 0 case-law · 85 none · 3 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule7

AustriaColombiaFinlandGermanyPhilippinesPolandSlovakia

Official guidance31

ArgentinaAustraliaBelgiumBrazilCanadaCroatiaCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFranceHong Kong SARIndonesiaIrelandIsraelItalyJapanLuxembourgMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaNorwaySingaporeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTürkiyeUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesVietnam

Proposed / consultation2

EcuadorSouth Africa

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found85

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileChinaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth KoreaSri LankaTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined3

HungaryRomaniaThailand
Must lawyers verify AI output before relying on it?

10 binding · 26 guidance · 1 proposed · 11 case-law · 77 none · 3 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule10

AustraliaCanadaIrelandPhilippinesPolandQatarSingaporeSlovakiaSpainUnited States

Official guidance26

AustriaBelgiumBrazilCzechiaEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyHong Kong SARIndonesiaIsraelJapanLuxembourgMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaNorwaySouth KoreaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanTürkiyeUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomVietnam

Proposed / consultation1

Ecuador

Set by case law11

ArgentinaChileChinaColombiaDenmarkIndiaItalyKenyaPakistanPortugalSouth Africa

Nothing found77

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPuerto RicoprovisionalRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSri LankaTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined3

HungaryRomaniaThailand
Has the bar or regulator issued generative-AI guidance?

4 binding · 30 guidance · 3 proposed · 0 case-law · 83 none · 8 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule4

IndiaPolandSlovakiaSpain

Official guidance30

ArgentinaAustraliaAustriaBelgiumBrazilCanadaCroatiaCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyHong Kong SARIndonesiaIrelandIsraelItalyJapanMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaNorwaySingaporeSwedenSwitzerlandTürkiyeUnited KingdomUnited States

Proposed / consultation3

PhilippinesSouth AfricaUkraineprovisional

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found83

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined8

ChinaHungaryLuxembourgRomaniaSouth KoreaSri LankaThailandVietnam
Do courts have rules for their own AI systems?

14 binding · 19 guidance · 6 proposed · 0 case-law · 66 none · 23 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule14

ArgentinaBrazilChinaColombiaCroatiaDenmarkIndiaIndonesiaIsraelItalyNepalPhilippinesSpainVietnam

Official guidance19

AustraliaBahrainCanadaChileEgyptFranceMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandPakistanPortugalSaudi ArabiaSouth KoreaSwedenTaiwanTürkiyeUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited States

Proposed / consultation6

EcuadorJapanKenyaNorwayPolandSouth Africa

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found66

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCubaprovisionalEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLebanonprovisionalMacaoprovisionalMauritiusprovisionalMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSri LankaTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined23

AustriaBelgiumCosta RicaCyprusCzechiaDominican RepublicEstoniaFinlandGermanyGreeceHong Kong SARHungaryIrelandLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaMexicoRomaniaSingaporeSlovakiaSwitzerlandThailand
May judges and court staff use AI in their own work?

10 binding · 20 guidance · 6 proposed · 1 case-law · 77 none · 14 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule10

BrazilChinaColombiaIndiaIndonesiaIsraelItalyNepalPhilippinesSpain

Official guidance20

ArgentinaAustraliaCanadaChileCroatiaFranceHong Kong SARIrelandMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandPakistanPortugalRwandaprovisionalSouth KoreaSwedenTaiwanUnited KingdomUnited StatesVietnam

Proposed / consultation6

EcuadorKenyaMoroccoNorwaySouth AfricaUkraineprovisional

Set by case law1

Mexico

Nothing found77

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCubaprovisionalDominican RepublicEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEstoniaEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPolandPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSri LankaTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalTürkiyeUgandaprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined14

AustriaBelgiumCyprusCzechiaDenmarkFinlandGermanyHungaryLuxembourgRomaniaSingaporeSlovakiaSwitzerlandThailand
Is AI training mandatory for lawyers?

21 binding · 8 guidance · 1 proposed · 0 case-law · 95 none · 3 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule21

AustriaBelgiumBulgariaprovisionalColombiaCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgNetherlandsPolandRomaniaSlovakiaSweden

Official guidance8

IndonesiaNepalPakistanPhilippinesPortugalSpainTürkiyeVietnam

Proposed / consultation1

South Africa

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found95

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAustraliaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBrazilBruneiprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCanadaChileChinaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalIsraelJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLebanonprovisionalMacaoprovisionalMalaysiaMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNew ZealandNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayOmanprovisionalPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth KoreaSri LankaSwitzerlandTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined3

Hong Kong SARSingaporeThailand
Must clients be told or asked before AI is used?

5 binding · 24 guidance · 0 proposed · 0 case-law · 92 none · 7 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule5

FinlandItalyKazakhstanprovisionalPolandSlovakia

Official guidance24

ArgentinaAustraliaBelgiumBrazilCanadaCzechiaDenmarkFranceGermanyIndonesiaIrelandIsraelJapanMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaSingaporeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTürkiyeUnited KingdomUnited States

Proposed / consultation0

None

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found92

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAustriaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJordanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPhilippinesPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSri LankaTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined7

EstoniaHong Kong SARHungaryNorwayRomaniaThailandVietnam
Must supervisors control AI-assisted legal work?

4 binding · 23 guidance · 0 proposed · 3 case-law · 92 none · 6 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule4

PhilippinesPolandSlovakiaSpain

Official guidance23

AustraliaAustriaBelgiumBrazilCanadaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyIndonesiaIrelandIsraelMalaysiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaNorwaySwedenSwitzerlandTürkiyeUnited KingdomUnited States

Proposed / consultation0

None

Set by case law3

ChileItalySingapore

Nothing found92

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChinaColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSri LankaTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined6

CzechiaHong Kong SARHungaryRomaniaThailandVietnam
Is AI barred from deciding cases or drafting judgments?

10 binding · 16 guidance · 3 proposed · 1 case-law · 91 none · 7 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule10

BrazilChinaColombiaFranceIndiaIsraelItalyNepalPhilippinesSpain

Official guidance16

ArgentinaAustraliaCanadaChileGermanyHong Kong SARIndonesiaIrelandNetherlandsPakistanPortugalSouth KoreaTaiwanUnited KingdomUnited StatesVietnam

Proposed / consultation3

EcuadorKenyaSouth Africa

Set by case law1

Mexico

Nothing found91

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAustriaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBelgiumBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDenmarkDominican RepublicEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEstoniaEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMalaysiaMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNew ZealandNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayOmanprovisionalPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPolandPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalTürkiyeUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined7

CzechiaFinlandHungaryRomaniaSingaporeSlovakiaThailand
Do self-represented litigants get AI-specific court guidance?

6 binding · 2 guidance · 1 proposed · 4 case-law · 108 none · 7 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule6

AustraliaCanadaIrelandPhilippinesSingaporeUnited States

Official guidance2

New ZealandUnited Kingdom

Proposed / consultation1

India

Set by case law4

ChinaFranceKenyaPoland

Nothing found108

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAustriaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBelgiumBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBrazilBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDenmarkDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEstoniaEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalHong Kong SARIcelandIndonesiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalIsraelItalyJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMalaysiaMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalTürkiyeUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined7

CzechiaFinlandHungaryRomaniaSlovakiaThailandVietnam
Must lawyers disclose AI use in court filings?

6 binding · 2 guidance · 4 proposed · 0 case-law · 110 none · 6 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule6

AustraliaCanadaIrelandPhilippinesQatarUnited States

Official guidance2

IsraelUnited Arab Emirates

Proposed / consultation4

EcuadorIndiaKenyaUnited Kingdom

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found110

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAustriaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBelgiumBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBrazilBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDenmarkDominican RepublicEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEstoniaEthiopiaprovisionalFinlandFranceGeorgiaprovisionalGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalHong Kong SARIcelandIndonesiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalItalyJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMalaysiaMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNetherlandsNew ZealandNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPolandPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSingaporeSloveniaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalTürkiyeUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined6

CzechiaHungaryRomaniaSlovakiaThailandVietnam
Can lawyers bill for AI-assisted work?

1 binding · 7 guidance · 0 proposed · 1 case-law · 109 none · 10 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule1

Slovakia

Official guidance7

AustraliaFranceNew ZealandPolandSpainTürkiyeUnited States

Proposed / consultation0

None

Set by case law1

Sweden

Nothing found109

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAustriaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBelgiumBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBrazilBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDenmarkDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMalaysiaMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPhilippinesPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSri LankaSwitzerlandTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined10

CanadaCzechiaEstoniaFinlandHong Kong SARHungaryRomaniaSingaporeThailandVietnam
Are consumer AI legal services regulated as legal practice?

4 binding · 3 guidance · 0 proposed · 1 case-law · 109 none · 11 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule4

FranceGermanyIrelandUnited Kingdom

Official guidance3

CzechiaJapanTürkiye

Proposed / consultation0

None

Set by case law1

Brazil

Nothing found109

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBelgiumBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCanadaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDenmarkDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEstoniaEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalIsraelItalyJamaicaprovisionalJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined11

FinlandHong Kong SARHungaryIndonesiaMalaysiaNew ZealandRomaniaSingaporeSlovakiaThailandVietnam
Do arbitration or ADR rules address AI?

0 binding · 5 guidance · 0 proposed · 0 case-law · 91 none · 32 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule0

None

Official guidance5

AustriaBrazilFranceUnited KingdomUnited States

Proposed / consultation0

None

Set by case law0

None

Nothing found91

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCanadaChileColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCubaprovisionalDenmarkDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalIsraelJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLebanonprovisionalMacaoprovisionalMalaysiaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPhilippinesPolandPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSri LankaSwedenTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalTürkiyeUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUnited Arab EmiratesUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined32

AustraliaBelgiumChinaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaEstoniaFinlandGermanyGreeceHong Kong SARHungaryIrelandItalyLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaNetherlandsNew ZealandPortugalRomaniaSingaporeSlovakiaSloveniaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSpainSwitzerlandTaiwanThailandVietnam
Are AI-generated evidence and deepfakes covered by rules?

1 binding · 3 guidance · 1 proposed · 3 case-law · 111 none · 9 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule1

Australia

Official guidance3

New ZealandSingaporeUnited Arab Emirates

Proposed / consultation1

United States

Set by case law3

ChinaPolandUnited Kingdom

Nothing found111

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArgentinaArmeniaprovisionalAustriaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBelgiumBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBrazilBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCanadaChileColombiaCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDenmarkDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEstoniaEthiopiaprovisionalFranceGeorgiaprovisionalGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKenyaKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLatviaLebanonprovisionalLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMalaysiaMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMexicoMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalNorwayOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPortugalPuerto RicoprovisionalQatarRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSouth AfricaSouth KoreaSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalTürkiyeUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined9

CzechiaFinlandHong Kong SARHungaryPhilippinesRomaniaSlovakiaThailandVietnam
Have courts sanctioned AI misuse?

1 binding · 0 guidance · 0 proposed · 32 case-law · 87 none · 8 unclear

Show countries by status

Binding rule1

Ireland

Official guidance0

None

Proposed / consultation0

None

Set by case law32

ArgentinaAustraliaBrazilCanadaChileChinaColombiaCzechiaDenmarkFranceGermanyHong Kong SARIndiaIsraelItalyKenyaNetherlandsNew ZealandNorwayPhilippinesPolandPortugalQatarSingaporeSlovakiaSouth AfricaSpainSwedenTürkiyeUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited States

Nothing found87

AfghanistanprovisionalAlbaniaprovisionalAlgeriaprovisionalArmeniaprovisionalAustriaAzerbaijanprovisionalBahrainBangladeshBelarusprovisionalBelgiumBoliviaprovisionalBosnia and HerzegovinaprovisionalBotswanaprovisionalBruneiprovisionalBulgariaprovisionalCambodiaprovisionalCameroonprovisionalCosta RicaCôte d'IvoireprovisionalCroatiaCubaprovisionalCyprusDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorprovisionalEthiopiaprovisionalGeorgiaprovisionalGhanaGreeceGuatemalaprovisionalHondurasprovisionalIcelandIndonesiaIranprovisionalIraqprovisionalJamaicaprovisionalJapanJordanprovisionalKazakhstanprovisionalKuwaitKyrgyzstanprovisionalLaosprovisionalLebanonprovisionalLuxembourgMacaoprovisionalMalaysiaMaltaMauritiusprovisionalMoldovaprovisionalMongoliaprovisionalMontenegroprovisionalMoroccoMozambiqueprovisionalMyanmarprovisionalNamibiaprovisionalNepalNicaraguaprovisionalNigeriaNorth MacedoniaprovisionalOmanprovisionalPakistanPanamaParaguayprovisionalPeruPuerto RicoprovisionalRussiaprovisionalRwandaprovisionalSaudi ArabiaSenegalprovisionalSerbiaprovisionalSloveniaSri LankaSwitzerlandTaiwanTanzaniaprovisionalThailandTrinidad and TobagoprovisionalTunisiaprovisionalUgandaprovisionalUkraineprovisionalUruguayUzbekistanprovisionalVenezuelaprovisionalVietnamZambiaprovisionalZimbabweprovisional

Not yet determined8

EstoniaFinlandHungaryLatviaLithuaniaMexicoRomaniaSouth Korea

Countries, by depth of regulation

Depth is a coverage tier, not a quality score: it reflects how many categories have binding rules, guidance, proposals or case-law positions on record.

Supranational & international

European Union3 binding · 10 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04International bodies0 binding · 16 guidance · 1 proposedExtensivechecked 2026-09-04
France4 binding · 12 guidanceExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Philippines11 binding · 1 guidance · 2 proposedExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Spain9 binding · 5 guidanceExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Ireland7 binding · 8 guidanceExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Australia4 binding · 11 guidance · 1 proposedExtensivechecked 2026-09-04United States3 binding · 11 guidance · 1 proposedExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Poland8 binding · 2 guidance · 1 proposedExtensivechecked 2026-09-04United Kingdom1 binding · 13 guidance · 1 proposedExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Germany6 binding · 6 guidanceExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Slovakia10 binding · 0 guidanceExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Brazil4 binding · 7 guidance · 2 proposedExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Canada3 binding · 10 guidanceExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Italy7 binding · 3 guidanceExtensivechecked 2026-09-04Netherlands2 binding · 11 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Sweden3 binding · 9 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Israel3 binding · 9 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04New Zealand0 binding · 13 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Denmark4 binding · 6 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Indonesia3 binding · 8 guidance · 1 proposedSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Türkiye0 binding · 12 guidance · 1 proposedSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Austria4 binding · 6 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Colombia7 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Finland6 binding · 3 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Belgium2 binding · 8 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Malaysia1 binding · 9 guidance · 1 proposedSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Singapore2 binding · 7 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Estonia3 binding · 6 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04India5 binding · 1 guidance · 2 proposedSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Czechia3 binding · 5 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Argentina1 binding · 7 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04China5 binding · 0 guidanceSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Nigeria1 binding · 7 guidance · 1 proposedSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Norway0 binding · 7 guidance · 3 proposedSubstantialchecked 2026-09-04Hong Kong SAR0 binding · 8 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Switzerland0 binding · 8 guidance · 1 proposedDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Croatia2 binding · 5 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Japan1 binding · 6 guidance · 1 proposedDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Luxembourg2 binding · 5 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Portugal1 binding · 5 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Nepal4 binding · 1 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04United Arab Emirates1 binding · 5 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Vietnam1 binding · 5 guidance · 1 proposedDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04South Korea1 binding · 5 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Taiwan1 binding · 5 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Hungary3 binding · 1 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Chile0 binding · 3 guidance · 1 proposedDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04South Africa0 binding · 0 guidance · 8 proposedDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Bulgariaprovisional3 binding · 0 guidanceDevelopingresearched 2026-09-04Kazakhstanprovisional3 binding · 0 guidanceDevelopingresearched 2026-09-04Latvia3 binding · 0 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Lithuania3 binding · 0 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Pakistan0 binding · 4 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Romania3 binding · 0 guidanceDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Bahrain1 binding · 2 guidance · 1 proposedDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Kenya0 binding · 0 guidance · 5 proposedDevelopingchecked 2026-09-04Egypt1 binding · 2 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Qatar2 binding · 0 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Saudi Arabia1 binding · 2 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Ecuador0 binding · 0 guidance · 6 proposedEarlychecked 2026-09-04Greece1 binding · 1 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Slovenia1 binding · 1 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Ukraineprovisional0 binding · 1 guidance · 3 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Kuwait1 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlychecked 2026-09-04Mauritiusprovisional0 binding · 2 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Morocco0 binding · 1 guidance · 2 proposedEarlychecked 2026-09-04Omanprovisional0 binding · 2 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Rwandaprovisional0 binding · 2 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Thailand0 binding · 2 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Cyprus1 binding · 0 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Iceland0 binding · 1 guidance · 1 proposedEarlychecked 2026-09-04Malta1 binding · 0 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Mexico0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlychecked 2026-09-04Peru1 binding · 0 guidanceEarlychecked 2026-09-04Russiaprovisional1 binding · 0 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Zambiaprovisional0 binding · 1 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Azerbaijanprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Cameroonprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Côte d'Ivoireprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Ethiopiaprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Iraqprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Jordanprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Moldovaprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Namibiaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 2 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Senegalprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Serbiaprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Tanzaniaprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Tunisiaprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Zimbabweprovisional0 binding · 1 guidanceEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Albaniaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Algeriaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Armeniaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Belarusprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Botswanaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Georgiaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Ghana0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlychecked 2026-09-04Iranprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Montenegroprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Mozambiqueprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04North Macedoniaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Ugandaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidance · 1 proposedEarlyresearched 2026-09-04Afghanistanprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Bangladesh0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedchecked 2026-09-04Boliviaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Bosnia and Herzegovinaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Bruneiprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Cambodiaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Costa Rica0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedchecked 2026-09-04Cubaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Dominican Republic0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedchecked 2026-09-04El Salvadorprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Guatemalaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Hondurasprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Jamaicaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Kyrgyzstanprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Laosprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Lebanonprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Macaoprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Mongoliaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Myanmarprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Nicaraguaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Panama0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedchecked 2026-09-04Paraguayprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Puerto Ricoprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Sri Lanka0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedchecked 2026-09-04Trinidad and Tobagoprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Uruguay0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedchecked 2026-09-04Uzbekistanprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04Venezuelaprovisional0 binding · 0 guidanceCheckedresearched 2026-09-04

Latest revisions to official documents

All 324 official documents
  1. 02 Sept 2026 · OTHER · OriginalLetter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal CodesMahkamah Agung
  2. 02 Sept 2026 · IN · JudgmentVijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v Union of India, 2026 INSC 947Supreme Court of India
  3. 01 Sept 2026 · OTHER · 1.0AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas]Lietuvos advokatūra
  4. 28 Aug 2026 · OTHER · Budget request announcementSupreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request)Supreme Court of Japan
  5. 28 Aug 2026 · OTHER · First edition, 2026Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi]Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
  6. 28 Aug 2026 · OTHER · SignedDecision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045Prime Minister of Vietnam

The official documents behind the map

324 official texts across 17 jurisdictions, each with its version history, the date it was last revised and the date we last verified it against the official source. 107 are listed as unverified because the official copy could not be opened directly.

Browse all 324 official documents

By type