KazakhstanThe AI Law requires users to receive information about automated processing and its consequences when AI decisions affect their rights, and requires notice when AI systems are used in services.
Regulation Tracker · Country · Asia-Pacific
Kazakhstan
Developingcivil lawupdated 2026-09-04researched 2026-09-04provisional
As of 4 September 2026 Kazakhstan has a binding 2025 Law On Artificial Intelligence, in force from January 2026, with definitions, risk classification, transparency, user-information, documentation and audit concepts. No bar, court-filing, judicial-use or hallucinated-citation sanction rule for legal practice was located.
As of 2026-09-04, Kazakhstan has 3 binding rules, official guidance in 0 categories, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. Binding rules cover client consent and transparency, data protection and legal AI, horizontal AI statute. In 17 categories we found nothing; in 0 the position is not yet determined.
How to read this page
- Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
- Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
- Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
- Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
- Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
- Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.
The rules, category by category
The 2025 AI Law includes data protection and confidentiality as regulatory principles and gives users rights to information about automated processing affecting their rights. It is economy-wide, not legal-sector specific.
Kazakhstan adopted Law No. 230-VIII On Artificial Intelligence on 17 November 2025. It defines AI systems, classifies systems by risk, sets transparency duties and assigns oversight to the AI and Digital Development ministry.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
The AI Law requires marking of synthetic AI outputs, but no rule on authentication or admissibility of AI-generated evidence in Kazakh courts was located.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Trusted lists, documentation and audits for high-risk AI systems exist under the AI Law, but no legal-sector procurement or vendor due-diligence rule was located.
Official documents recorded for Kazakhstan (0)
- No documents recorded yet; category sources link the official pages.
Court incidents on the record in Kazakhstan
- Yichang District Court (Hubei)2026-07-21 Warning
Cite this page
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Kazakhstan" (updated 2026-09-04, AI-researched, provisional 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/kz (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.