Regulation Tracker · 20 questions
Institutional arbitration or mediation rules and guidelines on AI use by parties, counsel and arbitrators.
As of 2026-09-04, 0 of 130 countries and entities have a binding rule for arbitration and ADR, 6 have official guidance, 0 have a proposal, 0 are set by case law, 92 were checked with nothing found and 32 remain unclear. No binding country-level rule is recorded for this question.
Tap or hover a country. Faint land has no record yet. Miller projection; boundaries as published by Natural Earth (India point of view) — see the disclaimer.
No countries in this status.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Vienna International Arbitral Centre (VIAC) is one of the few institutions with a published AI note; its provisions on confidentiality of case data in AI tools, non-delegation of the arbitrator's decision and verification are covered in the international map.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
CAM-CCBC Administrative Guidance 07/2025 of 17 July 2025: participants must understand AI tools and their limits, keep confidentiality, party representatives are responsible for the factual and legal accuracy of AI-assisted work, disclosure is decided case by case, and arbitrators must not delegate decision-making to AI.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
No French statute or institutional rule. Paris-seated ICC arbitration is covered by the ICC Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals (1 Jun 2026, paras 76–80) and the ICC Commission task force on AI; the Ciarb Guideline on the Use of AI in Arbitration (Mar 2025, updated Sept 2025) is the usual reference text. See the international map.
International bodies · verified 2026-09-04
Dense soft law: SVAMC Guidelines of April 2024, the SCC Guide of October 2024, the Ciarb Guideline of March 2025 updated September 2025, the VIAC Note of April 2025, AAA-ICDR arbitrator guidance and the JAMS AI Disputes Rules. The ICC, LCIA, SIAC and HKIAC have no dedicated guidance.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Ciarb Guideline on the Use of AI in Arbitration (Mar 2025, updated Sept 2025) is the reference text for London-seated arbitration; the LCIA opened a rules consultation on 11 Mar 2026 including AI disclosure and guardrails.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
The AAA-ICDR issued Guidance on Arbitrators' Use of AI Tools (2025): AI must support not replace the arbitrator's judgment, and use must be disclosed where it materially affects the process or reasoning. JAMS adopted dedicated AI Disputes Rules in 2024 barring delegation of decision-making to AI.
No countries in this status.
No countries in this status.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No Argentine arbitral institution AI rules found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. BCDR's arbitration rules (2022) and mediation rules (2019) contain no AI provisions; a site search found only a 2024 research paper and conference participation, not institutional guidance.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No AI rules from Cambodia's National Commercial Arbitration Centre or Arbitration Council found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No Canadian arbitral or mediation institution rule or guideline on AI found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No AI rules from CAM Santiago or other Chilean ADR bodies found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No Colombian arbitral institution AI rules found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Danish Institute of Arbitration had published no AI rule or guideline as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. CRCICA's Arbitration Rules in force since January 2024 contain no AI-specific provision and CRCICA has issued no AI guidance note.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
No EU instrument on AI in arbitration or ADR. The relevant instruments in Europe are institutional (e.g. CIArb 2023 guideline) rather than EU law.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
no rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
No Icelandic arbitration or mediation institution AI rule or guideline found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No AI rules or guidelines from MCIA, DIAC, IIAC or ICA found as of 4 September 2026; the MCIA Rules 2025 are silent on AI.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
BANI (Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia) has issued no AI rules or guidance and its 2022 Arbitration Rules are silent on AI. Arbitrator qualification under article 12 of the Arbitration Law (UU 30/1999) is read academically as excluding AI arbitrators.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. No Israeli arbitral institution has issued AI guidance; Israeli practice discussion refers to the SVAMC Guidelines (30 Apr 2024) rather than a domestic instrument.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No Japan Commercial Arbitration Association or other institutional AI rule found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
The Nairobi Centre for International Arbitration has hosted an AI-in-arbitration webinar but has issued no institutional rules or guidelines on AI. Checked 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
The AIAC Arbitration Rules 2026, i-Arbitration Rules 2026 and Asian Sports Arbitration Rules 2026 were full-text searched and contain no reference to artificial intelligence, generative AI or machine learning. The AIAC is a participating agency in the AI Legal Justice Roadmap.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No Mexican arbitral or mediation institution rule or guideline on AI found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. No AI rule or guidance from a Moroccan arbitration or mediation institution was located.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
No AI rules or guidance found from Nigerian arbitral institutions, including the Lagos Multi-Door Courthouse, as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Oslo Chamber of Commerce arbitration institute had issued no AI rule or guideline as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No institutional arbitration or ADR AI rules found as of 4 September 2026; Ishfaq Ahmed observed that mediation and ADR cannot be replaced by AI.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No AI rules from Panamanian arbitration or ADR bodies found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No AI rules from the Philippine Dispute Resolution Center Inc., the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution, or the wider ADR framework; the PDRCI Arbitration Rules (2015) predate the issue.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Lewiatan Court of Arbitration and the SA KIG had published no AI rules or guidelines as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No AI rules or guidance from the Qatar International Centre for Conciliation and Arbitration (QICCA) found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
The SCCA Arbitration Rules (2nd edition, in force 1 May 2023) contain no AI provision, and no SCCA AI guideline was found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The SCC Arbitration Institute had issued no AI guideline or rule as of 4 September 2026; no Swedish ADR body rule found.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. The Istanbul Arbitration Centre (ISTAC) has published no AI rules or guidance note. The TBB Guide extends its verification and honesty duties to arbitrators and mediators but is not an institutional arbitration instrument.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No AI rules or guidance published by the Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) or the DIFC-LCIA successor bodies as of 4 September 2026. DIAC launched the DANA case-management platform in January 2026 and an AI partnership with Jus Mundi in June 2025, neither accompanied by AI conduct rules.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No arbitration or ADR institution rule or guidance on AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
No institutional arbitration or mediation rule or guideline on AI was found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Not established. No ACICA, Resolution Institute or equivalent Australian arbitration AI guideline was located before the search budget was exhausted; NCAT PD 7 and PIC PD 13 cover tribunal, not arbitral, proceedings.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no CEPANI (Belgian Centre for Arbitration and Mediation) AI rule identified before the search budget was exhausted.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
CIETAC and SCIA homepages showed no AI guideline on 4 September 2026; institutional AI guidelines reported in secondary sources could not be verified before the research budget ran out.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched because the research budget was exhausted.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched because the research budget was exhausted.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no rule of the Arbitration Court attached to the Czech Chamber of Commerce could be checked without search access.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Whether the Arbitration Court of the Estonian Chamber of Commerce and Industry has issued an AI guideline could not be checked during research.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Whether the Arbitration Institute of the Finland Chamber of Commerce (FAI) has issued an AI note or rule could not be checked during research.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no DIS (German Arbitration Institute) AI rule or note identified before the search budget was exhausted. The Ciarb and ICC texts in the international map are the practical reference.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched because the research budget was exhausted.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Not established. No HKIAC or eBRAM generative-AI protocol or practice note was located before the search budget was exhausted.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no rule of the Commercial Arbitration Court attached to the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry could be checked.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no Irish arbitral institution AI rule identified.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched because the research budget was exhausted; no Italian arbitral-institution AI rule was identified.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Whether any Latvian arbitration court on the register has adopted an AI rule could not be checked during research.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Whether the Vilnius Court of Commercial Arbitration has issued an AI note or rule could not be checked during research.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched; the Malta Arbitration Centre was not checked because the research budget was exhausted.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no Nederlands Arbitrage Instituut (NAI) AI rule or note identified before the search budget was exhausted.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Not established. No AMINZ or NZDRC generative-AI protocol was located before the search budget was exhausted. The court guidelines apply to tribunals listed in the schedule, not to private arbitration.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched because the research budget was exhausted.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no rule of the Court of International Commercial Arbitration attached to the Romanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry could be checked.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Not established. No SIAC, SIMC or SIArb generative-AI protocol was located before the search budget was exhausted; the 2024 court guide governs court proceedings only.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no Slovak arbitration or mediation institution rule on AI could be checked without search access.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched because the research budget was exhausted.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
No AFSA or AAA-Africa AI guideline located within the research budget; not fully checked as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched within the research budget; the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board was not checked.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched because the research budget was exhausted; no Spanish arbitral-institution AI rule was identified.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched — no Swiss Arbitration Centre AI rule or note identified before the search budget was exhausted.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Not researched within the research budget; the Chinese Arbitration Association, Taipei, was not checked.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Leaning negative. A search of the Thailand Arbitration Center site returned no AI-related items, but its search does not reliably filter, so this is not evidence of absence.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Not established. A VIAC site search returned no AI-related items, but its search parameter does not filter, so this is not evidence of absence.
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Arbitration and ADR" by country, https://safelegalai.com/regulation/category/arbitration-adr (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.
Austria
Brazil
France
International bodies
United Kingdom
United States
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Argentina
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brunei
Bulgaria
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Cuba
Denmark
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Ethiopia
European Union
Georgia
Ghana
Guatemala
Honduras
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Israel
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Lebanon
Macao
Malaysia
Mauritius
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Nicaragua
Nigeria
North Macedonia
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Russia
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Tanzania
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Türkiye
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Australia
Belgium
China
Croatia
Cyprus
Czechia
Estonia
Finland
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong SAR
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
New Zealand
Portugal
Romania
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Switzerland
Taiwan
Thailand
Vietnam