RussiaFederal Law No. 243-FZ was officially published on 26 July 2026 and, according to secondary reporting, regulates sovereign and national AI models. The 2030 National AI Strategy remains the broader state policy framework.
Regulation Tracker · Country · Europe
Russia
Early: one or two positionscivil lawupdated 2026-09-04researched 2026-09-04provisional
As of 4 September 2026 Russia has a new federal AI law on sovereign and national AI models and a 2030 National AI Strategy, but no court, Supreme Court or Federal Chamber of Lawyers guidance on AI in legal practice was located. Synthetic-content labelling is not an evidence or filing rule.
As of 2026-09-04, Russia has 1 binding rule, official guidance in 0 categories, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. Binding rules cover horizontal AI statute. In 19 categories we found nothing; in 0 the position is not yet determined.
How to read this page
- Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
- Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
- Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
- Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
- Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
- Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.
The rules, category by category
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
The 2026 AI law and reporting address synthetic-content labelling and AI-model governance, not authentication or admissibility of AI-generated evidence in court.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No Federal Chamber of Lawyers guidance, ethics opinion or rule on generative AI use by advocates was located as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Russia's personal-data and information laws are cited in the National AI Strategy, but no Roskomnadzor or legal-sector AI processing guidance for lawyers was located.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Official documents recorded for Russia (0)
- No documents recorded yet; category sources link the official pages.
Court incidents on the record in Russia
- Yichang District Court (Hubei)2026-07-21 Warning
Cite this page
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Russia" (updated 2026-09-04, AI-researched, provisional 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/ru (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.