Skip to content
SafeLegalAI

72 on the record · +1 this week

Global Legal AI Incident Tracker

A structured database of incidents where AI misuse affected legal proceedings — and what courts and regulators did next. We record findings made by courts and regulators; we don't make them. Methodology · Download the dataset (JSON, CC BY 4.0)

Last updated 2026-07-16

72

incidents tracked

as of 2026-07-16

22

regulatory outcomes recorded

as of 2026-07-16

13

jurisdictions

as of 2026-07-16

Showing 72 of 72 incidents

Global Legal AI Incident Tracker — date, case, jurisdiction, AI tool, outcome, and consequence for each recorded incident.
DateCaseJurisdictionAI toolOutcomeConsequence
2026-07-15Dineen/Shibata v. Kotchka, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0606 PB (Ariz. Ct. App.)us-statesanctions
2026-07-08Tobosaru v Court of Law Craiova, Romania, [2026] EWHC 1720 (Admin)ukother
2026-07-02Pooja Ramesh Singh v. Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. & Anr., 2026 INSC 668indiaother
2026-07-01Leiske v. Kidd, C.A. No. 2025-0426-CDW (LWW) (Del. Ch.)us-stateother
2026-06-03Lnu v. Blanche, No. 24-4790 (9th Cir.)us-federalsuspensionUSD 5,000 State Bar of California: The Ninth Circuit ordered the Clerk to serve its disciplinary order on the State Bar of California and any other applicable licensing authorities for further proceedings as appropriate. No state-bar disposition is yet on record.
2026-05-27State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. Reeves, 2026 OK 37us-stateChatGPTwarning State bar disciplinary authorities (Oklahoma, Texas, Tennessee, Alabama): Public reprimand by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma (27 May 2026) under reciprocal discipline, following a Texas public reprimand (4 Nov 2025), a Tennessee public censure (15 Dec 2025), and an Alabama public reprimand (6 Mar 2026).
2026-05-22Cork & Anor v Smith, [2026] EWHC 1199 (Ch)ukreferral Solicitors Regulation Authority: Pinsent Masons self-referred to the SRA and agreed to pay the clients' costs arising from the erroneous correspondence; ICC Judge Mullen's judgment stands as a public admonishment, with the SRA investigation to follow.
2026-05-13Gleason v. Marcus, No. 2D2024-2688 (Fla. 2d DCA)us-statewarning
2026-05-06Rafique v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 673 (TC)ukdismissal
2026-05-05Tuyunuklu v Akmal, [2026] UKUT 174 (LC)ukdismissal
2026-04-24Ibach v. Stewart, No. SC-2025-0106 (Ala.)us-statesanctionsUSD 17,200 Alabama State Bar: The Supreme Court of Alabama referred Hall to the Alabama State Bar for potential discipline over possible violations of the Alabama Rules of Professional Conduct. No Bar disposition is yet on record.
2026-04-18In re Prince Global Holdings Ltd. (Sullivan & Cromwell AI disclosure), Ch. 15, S.D.N.Y.unverifiedus-federalother
2026-03-27McCarthy v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (3d Cir. 2026), No. 24-2704us-federalAI (unspecified)warning
2026-03-26Guerin v O'Doherty, [2026] IECA 48irelanddismissal
2026-03-22Ben Cohen v. Municipality of Ramat Gan & Ministry of Education, AAM 63194-08-25israelcosts-orderILS 30,000
2026-03-20Prososki v. Regan, 321 Neb. 38 (2026)us-statereferral Nebraska Counsel for Discipline: Appellant's counsel W. Gregory Lake was referred for investigation of potential violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct (competence, diligence, candor toward the tribunal, and dishonesty). [NEED: primary-source confirmation of the reported April 2026 indefinite suspension of Mr. Lake — on the follow-up watch list.]
2026-03-20State v. Coleman, 2026-Ohio-965 (Ohio Ct. App., 11th Dist.)us-stateChatGPTsanctionsUSD 2,000 Ohio Office of Disciplinary Counsel: The court fined counsel $2,000, removed him as counsel and struck the reopening application, and referred his conduct to the Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio.
2026-03-16Von Geitz v Kelly & Ors; Von Geitz v Robertson & Ors, [2026] IECA 29irelanddismissal
2026-03-09Green v Imprint Creative Print Solutions Ltd, 1809293/2024ukdismissal
2026-03-06Tan Hai Peng Micheal and another v Tan Cheong Joo and another [2026] SGHC 49singaporeChatGPTcosts-orderSGD 10,000
2026-03-02Ferko v Beyond Reach Ltd t/a Car Wash Crew, ADJ-00060622irelanddismissal
2026-02-11Jones v Family Court at Whangārei [2026] NZSC 1nzdismissal
2026-01-30Professional Standards Authority v Nursing and Midwifery Council & Anor, [2026] EWHC 141 (Admin)ukMicrosoft Copilotwarning
2026-01-29Folarin v Immigration Services Commissioner, [2026] UKFTT 135 (GRC)ukChatGPTdismissal
2026-01-27Cassata v. Michael Macrina Architect, P.C., 2026 NY Slip Op 26014us-stategenerative AI (AI-enhanced Westlaw)sanctionsUSD 10,000
2026-01-16Huish v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 129 (TC)ukother
2026-01-08Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. LeTennier, 2026 NY Slip Op 00040 (App. Div. 3d Dept.)us-stategenerative AI (unspecified)sanctionsUSD 10,000
2026-01-08Elden v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 41 (TC)ukother
2025-12-12Couvrette v. Wisnovsky, No. 1:21-cv-00157-CL (D. Or.)us-federalsanctionsUSD 110,204 Oregon State Bar: The court directed the Clerk to transmit its 12 December 2025 sanctions order to the Oregon State Bar (Brigandi appeared pro hac vice and is a California attorney). Referral only — no Bar disposition is yet on record.
2025-12-04Ko v. Li, 2025 ONSC 2965; 2025 ONSC 6785canadaChatGPTreferral Law Society of Ontario: The Law Society of Ontario is investigating Lee's conduct (file CAS-165781-ZOC5S2) and attended the December 2025 case conference as an observer; no disposition yet. Separately, Justice Myers issued a fresh show-cause for criminal contempt and referred carriage to the Attorney General of Ontario; the Crown took carriage and an amicus curiae (Dean Embry) was appointed. No finding of contempt yet.
2025-11-17UK v Secretary of State for the Home Department (AI hallucinations; supervision; Hamid), [2026] UKUT 81 (IAC)ukGoogle AIreferral Solicitors Regulation Authority: Solicitor and COLP Zubair Rasheed was referred to the SRA for failing to supervise the caseworker who drafted the fake citations. A separate adviser, Tahir Mohammed, escaped referral by self-reporting to the Immigration Advice Authority and the SRA before the tribunal acted.
2025-11-12Sheppard v Jillion LLC [2025] QIC (E) 3 (CTFIC0033/2025)gulfother
2025-10-29Mezu v. Mezu (Md. App. Ct. 2025), No. 361 Sept. Term 2025us-stateChatGPTreferral Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission: The court referred the attorney to the Maryland Attorney Grievance Commission based on the nature and severity of the conduct.
2025-10-06KMG Wires Pvt Ltd v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, WP(L) 24366/2025 (2025:BHC-OS:19789-DB)indiagenerative AI (unspecified)other
2025-10-01In re R.A. (Iowa Ct. App. 2025), No. 24-1629us-stateAI-driven research tools (unspecified)referralUSD 150 Iowa Attorney Discipline Board: The court struck the reply brief, imposed a $150 penalty (or two hours of AI-ethics CLE in lieu), and directed the clerk to transmit the opinion and counsel's written explanation to the Iowa Attorney Discipline Board.
2025-10-01Specter Aviation Limited c. Laprade, 2025 QCCS 3521unverifiedcanadaChatGPT (reported)fineCAD 5,000
2025-09-26Reddy v Saroya, 2025 ABCA 322canadagenerative AI (unnamed)costs-order
2025-09-25Greenopolis Welfare Association v. Narender Singh & Ors, CM(M) 1909/2025indiaother
2025-09-19Bethany Cingel v. Gregory Ferreri (Ind. Ct. App. 2025), No. 25A-DC-00500us-stategenerative AI (suspected)warning
2025-09-12Noland v. Land of the Free, L.P., No. B331918 (Cal. Ct. App.)us-stategenerative AI (unspecified)sanctionsUSD 10,000 State Bar of California: The court directed the clerk of the court to serve a copy of its opinion on the State Bar of California, referring counsel for the fabricated AI-generated citations.
2025-08-18Kurt Williams v. Karin Kirch (Ind. Ct. App. 2025), No. 25A-SC-00196us-stategenerative AI (suspected)warning
2025-08-15JNE24 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2025] FedCFamC2G 1314australiaClaude (research) and Microsoft Copilot (validation)costs-orderAUD 8,371.3 Legal Practice Board of Western Australia (LPBWA): The court referred the lawyer's conduct to the Legal Practice Board of Western Australia; no LPBWA disposition has been published — the referral is pending. A personal costs order of AUD 8,371.30 was made against the lawyer, payable to the Minister.
2025-08-12MS (Professional conduct, AI generated documents) Bangladesh, [2025] UKUT 305 (IAC)ukChatGPTreferral Bar Standards Board: The Upper Tribunal, presided over by its President Mr Justice Dove, referred barrister Muhammad Mujeebur Rahman to the Bar Standards Board for investigation, finding he had breached professional duties of honesty, integrity and competence.
2025-07-30The Father v The Mother & Ors, [2025] EWHC 2135 (Fam)ukdismissal
2025-07-23HMRC v Gunnarsson, [2025] UKUT 247 (TCC)ukdismissal
2025-07-16Robert Dastou v. Kathryn Holmes, No. 2381CV02212 (Mass. Super. Ct.)us-stateChatGPTsanctions
2025-07-07Coomer v. Lindell, No. 1:22-cv-01129 (D. Colo.)us-federalsanctionsUSD 6,000
2025-06-30Northbound Processing (Pty) Ltd v South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator (2025/072038) [2025] ZAGPJHC 661south-africaLegal Geniusreferral Legal Practice Council (Gauteng Provincial Office): The court referred the practitioners to the Legal Practice Council (Gauteng) for investigation, invoking the Article 16(1) reporting duty under the Code of Judicial Conduct; the LPC disposition is pending.
2025-06-30Nimat Shahid v. Sufyan Esaam (Ga. Ct. App. 2025)us-stategenerative AIfineUSD 2,500
2025-06-06Ayinde v London Borough of Haringey; Al-Haroun v Qatar National Bankukreferral BSB / SRA: Barrister referred to the Bar Standards Board; solicitors referred to the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The court found the contempt threshold capable of being met but did not initiate proceedings, warning that leniency should not be treated as precedent.
2025-06-01Hussein v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2025 FC 1060unverifiedcanadaVisto.ai (reported)pending
2025-05-26R. v. Chand, 2025 ONCJ 282unverifiedcanadaother
2025-05-22Garner v. Kadince, Inc., 2025 UT App 80us-stateChatGPTsanctionsUSD 1,000
2025-05-13Bandla v Solicitors Regulation Authority, [2025] EWHC 1167 (Admin)ukcosts-orderGBP 24,727.2 Solicitors Regulation Authority: The appellant had already been struck from the roll of solicitors by the SRA; the fabricated-authority conduct arose in his (unsuccessful) High Court appeal against that strike-off decision.
2025-04-04An v. Archblock, Inc. (Del. Ch. 2025)us-stategenerative AI (unspecified; court cited ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, CoCounsel as examples)other
2025-03-26Dewald v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co. (AI avatar at oral argument), App. Div. 1st Dept.unverifiedus-stateAI-generated video avatar (tool not named)warning
2025-03-24Sammaan Capital Ltd v. Mantri Infrastructure Pvt Ltd, CRP No. 49 of 2025indiareferral
2025-02-24Wadsworth v. Walmart, Inc., 348 F.R.D. 489 (D. Wyo. 2025)us-federalMorgan & Morgan internal AI tool (MX2.law)sanctionsUSD 5,000
2025-01-31Valu v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC2G 95australiaChatGPTreferral NSW Office of the Legal Services Commissioner: The Principal Registrar was directed to refer the solicitor's conduct to the NSW Office of the Legal Services Commissioner.
2025-01-10Kohls v. Ellison, No. 0:24-cv-03754 (D. Minn.)us-federalGPT-4oother
2025-01-08Mavundla v MEC: Department of Co-Operative Government and Traditional Affairs, KZN (7940/2024P) [2025] ZAKZPHC 2south-africaChatGPTreferral Legal Practice Council (KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Office): The court directed the registrar to send the judgment to the Legal Practice Council (KZN) for its attention and further action; the LPC's disposition is not yet on record. Wasted costs of two appearances were ordered against the firm Surendra Singh and Associates.
2024-12-30Buckeye Trust v. PCIT-2, Bangalore, ITA No. 1051/Bang/2024indiaother
2024-12-26Al-Hamim v. Star Hearthstone, LLC, 2024 COA 128us-statewarning
2024-11-25Gauthier v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., No. 1:23-CV-281 (E.D. Tex.)us-federalClaude (Anthropic)sanctionsUSD 2,000
2024-09-01Processo nº 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467 (TRT-2, 4ª Turma)brazilsanctions
2024-08-27Dayal [2024] FedCFamC2F 1166australiaLEAP legal-practice-management AI research toolother Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner (VLSB+C): On 19 August 2025 the VLSB+C varied the solicitor's practising certificate: he may no longer practise as a principal, cannot handle trust money or operate his own practice, may practise only as an employee solicitor, and must undertake two years of supervised practice with quarterly reporting.
2024-02-20Zhang v Chen, 2024 BCSC 285canadaChatGPTcosts-order Law Society of British Columbia: LSBC investigation into the lawyer's conduct followed the judgment; the court ordered costs against the lawyer personally and a review of her other court files.
2024-02-13Kruse v. Karlen, No. ED111172 (Mo. Ct. App., E.D.)us-statesanctionsUSD 10,000
2024-01-30Park v. Kim, 91 F.4th 610 (2d Cir. 2024)us-federalChatGPT (OpenAI)referral US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit — Grievance Panel: While affirming the dismissal on the merits, the court referred Attorney Jae S. Lee to its Grievance Panel under Local Rule 46.2 for investigation and possible referral to the Committee on Admissions and Grievances.
2023-12-04Harber v Commissioners for HMRC, [2023] UKFTT 1007 (TC)ukChatGPTdismissal
2023-06-29Parker v Forsyth NNO and Others (1585/20) [2023] ZAGPRD 1unverifiedsouth-africaother
2023-06-22Mata v Avianca, Inc.us-federalChatGPTsanctionsUSD 5,000

Missing an incident? Tell us — submissions are verified against primary sources before inclusion. Global baseline counts: see also Damien Charlotin's AI Hallucination Cases database.