Skip to content
SafeLegalAI

72 on the record · +1 this week

Incident Tracker

Tobosaru v Court of Law Craiova, Romania, [2026] EWHC 1720 (Admin)

other

In the High Court (Administrative Court), the Crown Prosecution Service filed extradition submissions citing two non-existent authorities, Vlad v Romania and Jeziorski v Poland, that the CPS later accepted likely originated from AI. The error was caught before the hearing; the appeal was dismissed on its merits and the CPS reviewed 78 other cases.

Date of decision/order
2026-07-08
Court
High Court of England and Wales (King's Bench Division, Administrative Court)
Jurisdiction
UK
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
In extradition proceedings the Crown Prosecution Service filed grounds of opposition and submissions citing two non-existent authorities, Vlad v Romania and Jeziorski v Poland. The CPS accepted the citations were inaccurate and likely originated from the use of artificial intelligence with inadequate human verification.
Consequence
See outcome

Sources

Cite this incident

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Tobosaru v Court of Law Craiova, Romania, [2026] EWHC 1720 (Admin)", safelegalai.com/tracker/tobosaru-v-romania (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.