Tobosaru v Court of Law Craiova, Romania, [2026] EWHC 1720 (Admin)
other
In the High Court (Administrative Court), the Crown Prosecution Service filed extradition submissions citing two non-existent authorities, Vlad v Romania and Jeziorski v Poland, that the CPS later accepted likely originated from AI. The error was caught before the hearing; the appeal was dismissed on its merits and the CPS reviewed 78 other cases.
- Date of decision/order
- 2026-07-08
- Court
- High Court of England and Wales (King's Bench Division, Administrative Court)
- Jurisdiction
- UK
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- In extradition proceedings the Crown Prosecution Service filed grounds of opposition and submissions citing two non-existent authorities, Vlad v Romania and Jeziorski v Poland. The CPS accepted the citations were inaccurate and likely originated from the use of artificial intelligence with inadequate human verification.
- Consequence
- See outcome
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Tobosaru v Court of Law Craiova, Romania, [2026] EWHC 1720 (Admin)", safelegalai.com/tracker/tobosaru-v-romania (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.