Skip to content
SafeLegalAI

72 on the record · +1 this week

Incident Tracker

Huish v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 129 (TC)

other

Before the First-tier Tax Tribunal, self-represented appellant Robert Huish cited four non-existent authorities he had generated using AI while preparing his hearing materials. The tribunal attached no blame to him given his litigant-in-person status but recorded the fake case names to warn others, and allowed his appeal on its substantive merits.

Date of decision/order
2026-01-16
Court
First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
Jurisdiction
UK
AI tool
Not identified in the record
Conduct
A self-represented appellant cited four purported authorities (Collins, Harrison, Baxter and Hicks) said to have been decided in 2021; none existed. He confirmed to the tribunal that he had used AI to help prepare his hearing materials.
Consequence
See outcome

Sources

Cite this incident

SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Huish v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 129 (TC)", safelegalai.com/tracker/huish-v-hmrc (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.