Huish v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 129 (TC)
other
Before the First-tier Tax Tribunal, self-represented appellant Robert Huish cited four non-existent authorities he had generated using AI while preparing his hearing materials. The tribunal attached no blame to him given his litigant-in-person status but recorded the fake case names to warn others, and allowed his appeal on its substantive merits.
- Date of decision/order
- 2026-01-16
- Court
- First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
- Jurisdiction
- UK
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- A self-represented appellant cited four purported authorities (Collins, Harrison, Baxter and Hicks) said to have been decided in 2021; none existed. He confirmed to the tribunal that he had used AI to help prepare his hearing materials.
- Consequence
- See outcome
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Huish v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 129 (TC)", safelegalai.com/tracker/huish-v-hmrc (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.