Elden v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 41 (TC)
other
Before the First-tier Tax Tribunal, Gary Elden's representatives, chartered accountants regulated by the ICAEW, filed a skeleton argument that used AI and misstated three real authorities. The tribunal refused HMRC's strike-out application but imposed strict directions requiring full judgment texts, pinpoint citations and statements of truth identifying who verified each cited case.
- Date of decision/order
- 2026-01-08
- Court
- First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
- Jurisdiction
- UK
- AI tool
- Not identified in the record
- Conduct
- The appellant's representatives — Strauss Phillips & Co, chartered accountants regulated by the ICAEW — filed a skeleton argument, prepared with AI, that materially misstated three real authorities (Hok, Atlantic Electronics and Leeds City Council v HMRC). The representative later confirmed AI had been used.
- Consequence
- See outcome
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Elden v Commissioners for HMRC, [2026] UKFTT 41 (TC)", safelegalai.com/tracker/elden-v-hmrc (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.