Cassata v. Michael Macrina Architect, P.C., 2026 NY Slip Op 26014
sanctions
A New York trial court fined an associate and her supervising partner $1,000 each (to the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection) and ordered the firm to pay $8,000 in fees after an opposition brief plagiarized from an AI-generated filing containing nonexistent cases and quotations. The court struck the opposition but declined to refer counsel to bar discipline.
- Date of decision/order
- 2026-01-27
- Court
- New York Supreme Court, Suffolk County
- Jurisdiction
- US-STATE
- AI tool
- generative AI (AI-enhanced Westlaw)
- Conduct
- Defense counsel filed an opposition containing nonexistent cases, fake quotations, and unsupported propositions largely plagiarized from another firm's AI-generated brief; the supervising partner and firm failed to supervise. Counsel denied using AI and the court disbelieved her.
- Consequence
- USD 10,000
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Cassata v. Michael Macrina Architect, P.C., 2026 NY Slip Op 26014", safelegalai.com/tracker/cassata-v-macrina (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.