Northbound Processing (Pty) Ltd v South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator (2025/072038) [2025] ZAGPJHC 661
referral
In this Gauteng High Court (South Africa) urgent mining-licence application, counsel's heads of argument cited fake authorities generated by the AI tool 'Legal Genius'. Smit AJ granted Northbound interim relief but, invoking the Article 16(1) reporting duty, referred the practitioners to the Legal Practice Council — the second such South African referral after Mavundla.
- Date of decision/order
- 2025-06-30
- Court
- High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- SOUTH-AFRICA
- AI tool
- Legal Genius
- Conduct
- In heads of argument for an urgent licensing application, counsel cited non-existent authorities hallucinated by the AI tool 'Legal Genius', which claimed to be trained exclusively on South African law. Asked directly, counsel confirmed they appeared to be AI hallucinations. Smit AJ invoked the Article 16(1) judicial duty to report serious misconduct.
- Consequence
- See outcome
- Regulatory outcome
- Legal Practice Council (Gauteng Provincial Office): The court referred the practitioners to the Legal Practice Council (Gauteng) for investigation, invoking the Article 16(1) reporting duty under the Code of Judicial Conduct; the LPC disposition is pending. (2025-06-30)
Sources
Cite this incident
SafeLegalAI Global Legal AI Incident Tracker, "Northbound Processing (Pty) Ltd v South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator (2025/072038) [2025] ZAGPJHC 661", safelegalai.com/tracker/northbound-processing (accessed 2026-07-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.