Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / South Africa

Revised Ethics Guidelines for Legal Practitioners in South Africa on the Use of Generative AI

Law Society of South Africa AI Committee (drafters, published via De Rebus)

last revised 2026-07-01last verified 2026-09-031 versioncountry page →

GuidanceProposedVerification dutyCompetenceConfidentiality

map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIDuty to verify AI outputTechnological competenceClient data in AI tools

Revised draft ethics guidelines on generative AI for South African legal practitioners, published 1 July 2026 in De Rebus by drafters working with the LSSA AI Committee after a 2026 consultation. Practitioners are fully responsible for AI-assisted work, must assess local relevance and bias, and must address cybersecurity risks. Not formally adopted by the LSSA or Legal Practice Council.

Applies to
lawyers, firms
Effective
See version history
Current version
Revised draft · 01 Jul 2026
Last verified
03 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • Legal practitioners are fully responsible for AI-assisted work product.
  • Output must be evaluated for accuracy, local legal relevance and bias.
  • Practitioners must address cybersecurity risks such as prompt injection and data corruption.
  • Offered as a collaborative contribution; not formally adopted by the LSSA or LPC.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Revised draftcurrent2026-07-01First version recorded.official

Related court incidents on the record

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Revised Ethics Guidelines for Legal Practitioners in South Africa on the Use of Generative AI" (Law Society of South Africa AI Committee (drafters, published via De Rebus), Revised draft, 2026-07-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/south-africa/za-lssa-revised-generative-ai-ethics-guidelines (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in South Africa