Regulation Tracker · 20 questions
General generative-AI guidance for practitioners issued by a bar, law society or regulator.
As of 2026-09-04, 4 of 130 countries and entities have a binding rule for bar guidance on generative AI, 32 have official guidance, 3 have a proposal, 0 are set by case law, 83 were checked with nothing found and 8 remain unclear. Binding countries: India, Poland, Slovakia, Spain.
Tap or hover a country. Faint land has no record yet. Miller projection; boundaries as published by Natural Earth (India point of view) — see the disclaimer.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
The Bar Council of India circular of 17 July 2026 on digital and social-media conduct requires advocates to disclose generative-AI use in online legal-awareness content and prohibits fabricated judgments, AI-generated non-existent case law and deepfake court content, with disciplinary consequences. No general generative-AI practice guidance exists yet.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Two-track. 'AI w pracy radcy prawnego' (KIRP, 1st edition, Warsaw 2025, ISBN 978-83-972004-4-9) sets 22 recommendations for legal advisers and is guidance. The NRA ethics code amendments of 12–13 June 2026 (new § 23e, amended § 19(6)) bind advocates.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Unlike most European bars, SAK legislated rather than advised: 'Pravidlá používania nástrojov umelej inteligencie v advokátskej praxi', Presidium Resolution 12/4/2025 of 31 Mar 2025 (in force 1 May 2025), amended by Resolution 21/14/2025 of 6 Nov 2025 adding a ten-article methodological guidance plus model client clauses, published in Vestník SAK issue 87 on 25 Nov 2025.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Binding: CGAE Circular 3/2026 on generative AI and verification. Guidance: the Madrid Bar Guide of Good Practice of October 2025 and the CGAE White Paper on AI and the Legal Profession presented on 30 January 2026. The press also cites a 2024 CGAE AI guide and Circular 1/2025, which were not opened.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
The Buenos Aires bar's Guide for the Use of AI for Lawyers, published in July 2025 by its fintech and legaltech laboratory, sets four pillars: responsible use, permanent human control, data protection and confidentiality, and continuous training, with an explicit warning on hallucinations and non-delegation of decisions.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Dense. A joint statement of three regulators (6 December 2024), QLS Guidance Statement No. 37 (31 May 2024) and a QLS AI checklist, and the Law Society of NSW's Solicitor's Guide to Responsible Use of AI (9 January 2026), which also runs a court-protocols hub tracking every Australian court instrument.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
ÖRAK 'KÜNSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ (KI) IN ANWALTSKANZLEIEN', Stand September 2025, issued by the ÖRAK's Ausschuss IT und Digitalisierung — four pages in five sections (AI basics, professional and data-protection framework, practical implementation, AI competence, provider checklist), distributed through the Anwaltsblatt. The ÖRAK also ran its first KI-Tag in March 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
'Richtlijnen voor advocaten voor het gebruik van Artificiële Intelligentie' / 'Lignes directrices à l'intention des avocat(e)s sur l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle', dated 1 February 2025 (announced 31 Jan 2025), issued jointly by the OVB and Avocats.be through their digitalisation and deontology commissions. Six pages, bilingual, adding no new deontological duties but applying existing ones.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
Federal OAB Recommendation 001/2024, approved 11 November 2024, sets four pillars: applicable law, confidentiality, ethical practice and communication about AI use. It was elevated to institutional policy by the National Plan for Integrating AI into Legal Practice of 15 June 2026, which promises a Code of Good Practice.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
Thirteen of fourteen law societies have issued generative-AI guidance (all except New Brunswick), grounded in the Federation of Law Societies Model Code. The Canadian Bar Association publishes Ethics of Artificial Intelligence for the Legal Practitioner as a national practice tool.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Croatian Bar has not issued its own generative-AI guidance as of 4 September 2026; it disseminates CCBE and CEPEJ documents to members without additional recommendations.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
ČAK issued 'Stanovisko k užívání umělé inteligence (AI) při poskytování právních služeb' (PDF dated 20 Sept 2023, author Martin Maisner), a six-point non-binding opinion. A broader 'Strategie ČAK pro oblast umělé inteligence' was board-approved in structure by 7 July 2026, with formal adoption expected September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Danske Advokater (the trade body) published two AI guides on 17 Dec 2024: one on the AI Act's significance for law firms, one on considerations before buying and using AI (confidentiality, IP, GDPR, ESG, conduct rules). Advokatsamfundet has published commentary but no formal guidance.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Eesti Advokatuur published 'Tehisaru juhend advokaatidele' on 3 December 2024, prepared by its intellectual property and IT law commission, to help advocates and office staff use AI effectively and responsibly. The guide itself is distributed to members; only the announcement is public.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
CCBE Guide on the use of generative AI by lawyers (2 Oct 2025) is the pan-European bar guidance: permissive with cautions on limitations, verification, professional secrecy and the AI Act's literacy and transparency duties.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Annex 5 of Data Security Manual B 05.2, 'Tekoälyopas asianajajalle' (AI guide for the advocate), added 19 Apr 2024, updated by the board 13 Nov 2025, in force 1 Dec 2025. Twelve numbered requirements plus a Copilot deployment guide. Recommendatory, but a commentary on the binding B 05.1.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Two CNB documents: the 'Guide pratique — Utilisation des systèmes d'intelligence artificielle générative' (1st ed., September 2024, 42 pp.) and the 'Guide pratique — La déontologie et l'intelligence artificielle' adopted at the assemblée générale of 17 March 2026. The CNB also republished the CCBE guide and runs a free Skilia/Lefebvre Dalloz AI course open until 2027.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
BRAK 'Hinweise zum Einsatz von künstlicher Intelligenz (KI)', Stand December 2024, published 9 Jan 2025 — eight sections covering § 43 BRAO verification, confidentiality and § 43e outsourcing, BRAO transparency, the AI Act, copyright/tax/insurance risks and European bar recommendations. BRAK also circulated the CCBE generative-AI guide and the CCBE technical guide adopted 27 Mar 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Circular 25-824, Generative AI in Legal Practice: Risks and Tips (December 2025), is the profession's principal instrument, covering verification, confidentiality and tool selection. No equivalent Hong Kong Bar Association guidance for barristers was located.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
PERADI issued the Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan bagi Advokat Indonesia on 6 August 2026, Indonesia's first bar AI guideline, using permitted, supervised and prohibited risk tiers. It is a non-binding professional standard; the full text is not published at an official URL.
International bodies · verified 2026-09-04
The CCBE Guide on generative AI for lawyers of 2 October 2025 is the reference for European bars; the IBA and CAIDP report The Future is Now and the IBA ANLBS guide on AI as a professional tool are the global bar-level texts. All are non-binding.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Law Society of Ireland, 'Use of Generative AI: Guidance for the Legal Profession', version 4 dated 12 November 2025. No equivalent Bar of Ireland or LSRA document was verified in this pass.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
Opinion At/60/24, the first Israeli bar instrument on generative AI, published 2024 by the National Ethics Committee. In March 2025 Bar president Amit Bechar directed the drafting of detailed permitted/prohibited AI rules; those detailed rules had not been published as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The National Bar Council's official output is the article 13 model client notice of 13 October 2025 and the Italian edition of the CCBE guide published in November 2025; no standalone generative-AI guideline was located. Local bars such as Torre Annunziata and Rome have issued their own guidelines.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
The JFBA AI Strategy Working Group notice of September 2025 is members-only and covers confidentiality, hallucination, responsibility and client explanation. The Japan Patent Attorneys Association published public AI-use guidelines for patent attorneys in April 2025.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Two circulars. Circular 342/2023 (24 November 2023) on the risks and precautions of ChatGPT in the profession, and Circular 242/2025 (3 July 2025), which annexes an advisory setting out recommended and prohibited uses, a nine-risk mitigation table and a four-R framework.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
NOvA 'Aanbevelingen AI in de advocatuur', published end of 2025 (reported 10 Dec 2025), prepared by the projectgroep Digitalisering & AI. Structured around the five statutory core values — deskundigheid, vertrouwelijkheid, onafhankelijkheid, integriteit, partijdigheid — with about seventeen concrete recommendations. The NOvA also points members to the CCBE guides.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
New Zealand Law Society generative-AI guidance, first published 2024 and updated 24 February 2026, covering verification, privacy and privilege, client communication and fee review. It is the profession's principal instrument; there is no separate Bar Association guidance.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
NBA-SLP launched four technology documents on 28 Aug 2024, including Guidelines for the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Legal Profession in Nigeria (34pp, Technology and Law Committee). The publicly circulated text is watermarked DRAFT.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Advokatforeningen's ethics committee produced 'Veiledning for bruk av kunstig intelligens i advokatvirksomhet', approved by the board on 5 September 2025. The Association also circulates the CCBE generative-AI guide to members.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Two instruments in 2026: MinLaw's Guide for Using Generative AI in the Legal Sector (6 March 2026) for law practices adopting AI, and the Law Society's Advisory on the Use of Publicly Available AI Tools (2 April 2026) for consumer chatbots. Both are non-binding but track the professional conduct rules.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The board adopted general advice on generative AI models on 13 June 2024; a working group then produced 'Vägledning om användning av generativ AI i advokatverksamhet', dated Stockholm 12 June 2025, with sections on regulatory compliance, advisory liability, confidentiality, and principal liability and office organisation.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
SAV-Wegleitung für den Umgang mit künstlicher Intelligenz — approved by the SAV board on 14 June 2024, republished 16 February 2025 with the Federal Council's 12 Feb 2025 decisions. Six pages plus glossary, covering professional secrecy and data protection, independent verification, liability, copyright, notification duties, and the Swiss/EU/Council of Europe regulatory landscape.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
'Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers', published by TBB on 28 Aug 2026, prepared by its Information and Technology Law Commission following the AI and Advocacy Workshop in Ankara on 14-15 Feb 2026. 44 pages, principle-based, expressly advisory and subject to periodic review. It notably bars profiling, scoring or comparing judges' decisions using their identity data, or attempting to predict a named judge's ruling in a given file.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Four current documents: BSB 'Guidance on the use of Artificial Intelligence and Other Technologies' (from 18 May 2026), Bar Council 'Considerations when using ChatGPT and generative AI' (25 Nov 2025), Law Society 'Generative AI: the essentials' (June 2026) and the SRA's Risk Outlook report on AI in the legal market (Nov 2023), alongside the SRA's compliance tips and warning notice.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
ABA Formal Opinion 512 (29 Jul 2024) is the national ethics baseline. Sector regulators have added their own: USPTO practice guidance (11 Apr 2024) and DOJ EOIR Policy Memorandum 25-40 (8 Aug 2025) for immigration proceedings.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No IBP-issued AI guidance exists. The Framework directs the IBP to monitor the profession's engagement with AI tools and report regularly to the Supreme Court, and gives the new AI Committee a mandate to direct ethical AI use in the practice of the legal profession.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
In 2026 the LPC invited the profession to comment on proposed Ethics Guidelines for Legal Practitioners on the Use of Generative AI, and held a webinar on AI in legal research in August 2025. The LSSA AI Committee's revised draft was published in De Rebus on 1 July 2026. Neither has been adopted.
The White Paper programme says guidelines for lawyers are being developed. No issued UNBA rule, ethics opinion or practice note on generative AI was located.
No countries in this status.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. No generative-AI guidance from the Bahrain Bar Society was located.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No Bangladesh Bar Council guidance on generative AI found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
No Supreme Bar Council AI guidance text was located. BTA reported in 2026 that the Justice Minister welcomed council efforts to regulate AI use by lawyers, but no public rule or draft was found.
No generative-AI guidance from the Bar Association of the Kingdom of Cambodia found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance from the Chilean Bar Association, membership of which is voluntary, found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
Colombia has no mandatory bar; no practitioner-facing generative-AI guidance from the Ministry of Justice or the National Commission of Judicial Discipline was found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance from the Costa Rican Bar Association found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Legal 500 Cyprus reported in September 2025 that there are no specific guidelines, voluntary standards or ethical principles on AI; the Cyprus Bar Association has run seminars and training only.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance from the Dominican Bar Association found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance from provincial bar associations found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. The Egyptian Bar Association has run 'Generative AI for Lawyers' workshops with MCIT since October 2025 but has published no guidance, circular or charter on lawyers' AI use.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
No Ghana Bar Association or General Legal Council generative-AI guidance found. Commentary published 27 Mar 2026 records that the GBA has made no input on AI in legal practice and calls on the GLC to clarify how existing duties apply.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
No Greek bar guidance on generative AI found as of 4 September 2026; the Athens Bar relays CCBE documents and runs seminars.
No generative-AI guidance from the Colegio de Abogados y Notarios de Guatemala found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the Colegio de Abogados de Honduras found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Lögmannafélag Íslands has published no generative-AI guidance, circular or code amendment; its site carries no gervigreind material as of 4 September 2026, though a 'digital sovereignty' panel is scheduled for Lagadagurinn 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from Jamaica's General Legal Council found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
The LSK has formed an ICT and AI Committee to guide adoption and training under President Charles Kanjama, and speakers at the 2026 LSK Annual Conference urged it to make AI rules including mandatory disclosure, but no LSK guidance document exists as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. The Kuwait Bar Association hosted a conference with the French Embassy on AI, law and the role of lawyers in October 2024 but has published no guidance for practitioners.
No generative-AI guidance from the Advokatura of the Kyrgyz Republic found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Collegium's published internal normative acts are limited to its 2022 statutes, the 2019 Ethics Code and the Council's complaints procedure. No generative-AI guidance, circular or code amendment was published as of 4 September 2026.
No AI guidance from the Beirut or Tripoli bar associations was found. The 2025 Lebanese University guidelines are academic/public-sector AI governance guidance, not bar guidance.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Lietuvos advokatūra had published no generative-AI guidance document as of 4 September 2026, but maintains a standing Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Committee [Informacinių technologijų ir dirbtinio intelekto komitetas] that meets regularly, making guidance a live prospect.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
Neither the Chamber of Advocates nor the Committee for Advocates and Legal Procurators has issued AI guidance as of 4 September 2026, though Legal 500 expects it soon.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance from the Barra Mexicana, Colegio de Abogados or any other Mexican bar association found as of 4 September 2026; the Barra offers a paid diploma course on generative AI ethics for lawyers but has published no guidance document.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the Mongolian Bar Association found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Africa · verified 2026-09-04
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. No AI charter or guidance from the Association des Barreaux du Maroc was located; a private association of digital-law practitioners (APDND) launched in Casablanca in April 2026 but is not a regulator.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No Nepal Bar Council or Nepal Bar Association guidance on AI found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No Pakistan Bar Council or provincial bar guidance on generative AI found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance from the National Bar Association found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the Colegio de Abogados del Paraguay found as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance from the Lima Bar or other bar colleges found as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Portuguese Bar Association has published no generative-AI guidelines as of 4 September 2026; it offers training and links to EU material, and members rely on the CCBE guide.
No generative-AI guidance from the Colegio de Abogados y Abogadas de Puerto Rico found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
Qatar has no independent bar association; lawyers are licensed by the Ministry of Justice, which has published no generative-AI guidance for practitioners as of 4 September 2026.
No Federal Chamber of Lawyers guidance, ethics opinion or rule on generative AI use by advocates was located as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance for practitioners published by the Saudi Bar Association or the Ministry of Justice as of 4 September 2026. Practitioners are directed to SDAIA's horizontal instruments.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No Serbian Bar Association rule, ethics opinion or guidance on generative AI use by lawyers was located as of 4 September 2026.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Slovenian Bar Association has issued no generative-AI guidance as of 4 September 2026; activity is limited to conferences and journal articles.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
No Taiwan Bar Association generative-AI guidance found; Judicial Weekly in May 2026 confirms the absence of rules for lawyers.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the Law Association of Trinidad and Tobago found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
Middle East · verified 2026-09-04
The UAE has no independent national bar association; advocates are licensed by the Ministry of Justice and the emirate-level legal affairs departments. No generative-AI guidance for practitioners has been published by any of them as of 4 September 2026.
Americas · verified 2026-09-04
No generative-AI guidance from the Uruguayan Bar Association found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the national bar or law society found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
No bar-association or law-society generative-AI guidance for practitioners was found as of 4 September 2026.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
The All China Lawyers Association site lists only an industry-observation article on AI; no guidance was located before the research budget ran out, and lawyer-facing AI guidance could not be confirmed either way.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The MÜK homepage was checked on 4 September 2026 and showed no AI news, regulation or professional position; its Szakmai álláspontok and Szabályzattár repositories could not be searched without search access, so absence of guidance is not established.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
The Luxembourg Bar website (barreau.lu) returned an error page throughout this research pass, so the absence of bar guidance could not be confirmed. Treat as unchecked. The Bar is a CCBE member and the CCBE guide of 2 Oct 2025 and technical guide of 27 Mar 2026 are the default references.
Europe · verified 2026-09-04
unbr.ro returned HTTP 403 on 4 September 2026 and could not be inspected; no UNBR Council decision or guidance on generative AI could be confirmed or excluded.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
The Korean Bar Association had issued no AI guidance; its June 2024 page only summarises activity by other bars. A Seoul Bar Association legal-tech and AI committee reportedly drafted guidelines, but no text was located.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
A Bar Association of Sri Lanka draft framework on generative AI in legal practice was reported in June 2026, but a site search on 4 September 2026 returned no AI-related post and no document could be opened.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Leaning negative but not established. The Lawyers Council homepage was opened and carries no AI item in news, regulations or announcements; the Thai Bar Association site is a splash page. Neither is strong enough to record as an affirmative absence.
Asia-Pacific · verified 2026-09-04
Leaning negative. A site search of the Vietnam Bar Federation for tri tue nhan tao surfaced only a LAWASIA 2023 conference report on AI's impact on the profession, and no Federation rule or guidance.
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Bar guidance on generative AI" by country, https://safelegalai.com/regulation/category/bar-guidance (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.
India
Poland
Slovakia
Spain
Argentina
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
Croatia
Czechia
Denmark
Estonia
European Union
Finland
France
Germany
Hong Kong SAR
Indonesia
International bodies
Ireland
Israel
Italy
Japan
Malaysia
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nigeria
Norway
Singapore
Sweden
Switzerland
Türkiye
United Kingdom
United States
Philippines
South Africa
Ukraine
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Belarus
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brunei
Bulgaria
Cambodia
Cameroon
Chile
Colombia
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Cuba
Cyprus
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Ethiopia
Georgia
Ghana
Greece
Guatemala
Honduras
Iceland
Iran
Iraq
Jamaica
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lithuania
Macao
Malta
Mauritius
Mexico
Moldova
Mongolia
Montenegro
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nepal
Nicaragua
North Macedonia
Oman
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Russia
Rwanda
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Slovenia
Taiwan
Tanzania
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Uganda
United Arab Emirates
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Venezuela
Zambia
Zimbabwe
China
Hungary
Luxembourg
Romania
South Korea
Sri Lanka
Thailand
Vietnam