Points of Attention on the Use of Generative AI in Attorney Practice: Five Points for Appropriate Use
Japan Federation of Bar Associations (Nichibenren), AI Strategy Working Group
last revised 2025-09-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceConfidentialityVerification dutyCompetence
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIClient data in AI toolsDuty to verify AI outputClient consent and transparency
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Members-only guidance issued in September 2025 by the JFBA's AI Strategy Working Group setting five points for appropriate use of generative AI in legal practice: keep confidential and client-identifiable information out of external AI services; treat outputs including cited cases as unverified until checked against primary sources; the attorney bears final responsibility.
- Applies to
- lawyers
- Effective
- 01 Sept 2025
- Current version
- Original · 01 Sept 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- olga-legal.com/13865/
What the document requires
- Confidentiality: avoid inputting client-identifiable or confidential information into external generative-AI services.
- Hallucination: verify AI-cited statutes and case law against primary sources before use.
- Responsibility remains with the attorney; AI output is not exculpatory.
- Client explanation and record-keeping of verification steps.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-09-01 | Published September 2025 on the JFBA members-only site; exact day not public and the text is not publicly accessible. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Points of Attention on the Use of Generative AI in Attorney Practice: Five Points for Appropriate Use" (Japan Federation of Bar Associations (Nichibenren), AI Strategy Working Group, Original, 2025-09-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/jp-jfba-generative-ai-notice-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI