Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request)
Supreme Court of Japan
last revised 2026-08-28last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
PolicyProposedProhibitionConfidentiality
map categories:Courts' own AI deploymentJudges' use of AIAI barred from deciding cases
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Supreme Court of Japan announced on 28 August 2026 a budget request for the 2027 financial year to build and test a generative-AI system on records of settled civil cases. AI would draft record summaries and issue lists to reduce judges' workload, with leak prevention for personal data; AI is excluded from judges' decision-making.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Budget request announcement · 28 Aug 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- news.web.nhk/newsweb/na/nd-20260828de46923
What the document requires
- Demonstration limited to summarising records and organising issues, not decision-making.
- Security controls to prevent leakage of party data and trade secrets.
- Follows a January-February 2026 study by six judges using mock records, and full digitisation of civil procedure in May 2026.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Budget request announcementcurrent | 2026-08-28 | Announced FY2027 budget request for system development and a demonstration using settled-case records. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request)" (Supreme Court of Japan, Budget request announcement, 2026-08-28), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/jp-supreme-court-civil-trial-ai-pilot-2026 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI
- Law 5321/2026: measures for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 and amendment of Law 4961/2022 · Parliament (GR)