Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
MSBA AI and Legal Technology Task Force: Ethical Considerations for Attorney Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Maryland State Bar Association, AI and Legal Technology Task Force · Maryland
last revised 2025-05-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →GuidanceIn forceCompetenceVerification dutyConfidentialitySupervision
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIClient data in AI toolsBilling for AI workTechnological competenceDuty to verify AI outputSupervision of AI work
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Maryland's only bar-level AI guidance is an MSBA task force advisory from May 2025. It surveys competence, confidentiality, verification and supervision under the Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct but is not a numbered ethics opinion and was not readable in this research run.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 01 May 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Non-binding overview of ethical considerations for attorney use of generative AI under the Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct
- Not a numbered ethics opinion; Maryland has no AGC or Supreme Court AI ethics opinion
- Full text distributed through the MSBA store and not verified in this run
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-05-01 | Published by the MSBA AI and Legal Technology Task Force; the source gives a month only (published May 2025), so the day is recorded as the 1st | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "MSBA AI and Legal Technology Task Force: Ethical Considerations for Attorney Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence" (Maryland State Bar Association, AI and Legal Technology Task Force, Original, 2025-05-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-md-msba-ai-task-force-advisory (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)