Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
MSBA AI and Legal Technology Task Force: Ethical Considerations for Attorney Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Maryland State Bar Association, AI and Legal Technology Task Force · Maryland
last revised 2025-05-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →GuidanceIn forceCompetenceVerification dutyConfidentialitySupervision
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIClient data in AI toolsBilling for AI workTechnological competenceDuty to verify AI outputSupervision of AI work
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Maryland's only bar-level AI guidance is an MSBA task force advisory from May 2025. It surveys competence, confidentiality, verification and supervision under the Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct but is not a numbered ethics opinion and was not readable in this research run.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 01 May 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Non-binding overview of ethical considerations for attorney use of generative AI under the Maryland Attorneys' Rules of Professional Conduct
- Not a numbered ethics opinion; Maryland has no AGC or Supreme Court AI ethics opinion
- Full text distributed through the MSBA store and not verified in this run
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-05-01 | Published by the MSBA AI and Legal Technology Task Force; the source gives a month only (published May 2025), so the day is recorded as the 1st | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "MSBA AI and Legal Technology Task Force: Ethical Considerations for Attorney Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence" (Maryland State Bar Association, AI and Legal Technology Task Force, Original, 2025-05-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-md-msba-ai-task-force-advisory (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court