Skip to content

Regulation Tracker · Country · Africa

Egypt

Early: one or two positionscivil lawupdated 2026-09-04verified 2026-09-04

As of 4 September 2026 Egypt has no court rule, judicial guidance or bar rule on AI in legal practice. Its National AI Strategy (2nd edition, January 2025) names the judiciary a target sector for the national Arabic large model, and the March 2026 National AI Governance Framework guide sets non-binding risk tiers that do not classify justice as high-risk.

As of 2026-09-04, Egypt has 1 binding rule, official guidance in 2 categories, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. Binding rules cover data protection and legal AI. In 17 categories we found nothing; in 0 the position is not yet determined.

How to read this page
  • Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
  • Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
  • Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
  • Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
  • Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
  • Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.

The rules, category by category

Data protection and legal AI

Binding rule

verified 2026-09-04

Personal Data Protection Law No. 151 of 2020 and its Executive Regulations (Minister of Communications Decree No. 816 of 2025, in force 2 Nov 2025, compliance by 1 Nov 2026) expressly address personal data used to train AI. Economy-wide, not legal-sector specific; official gazette text not opened.

Courts' own AI deployment

Official guidance

verified 2026-09-04

Egypt's National AI Strategy (2nd edition, Jan 2025) names the judiciary a target sector for the national Arabic model, listing transcription of legal proceedings, case classification, litigation and claim assessment, virtual legal aid and drafting assistance for judges; Egyptian-accent speech recognition is already used to produce court minutes.

Horizontal AI statute

Official guidance

verified 2026-09-04

The Guide to Egypt's National AI Governance Framework (ed. 2.0, March 2026, NCAI/ECRAI) sets four risk tiers: prohibited; high-risk (critical infrastructure and biometrics, mandatory dual-check conformity); limited (chatbots, deepfakes); minimal. Full-text search found no reference to justice, courts or the judiciary. A dedicated AI law is reported in draft.

Disclosure of AI use in filings

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. No Egyptian court rule or Court of Cassation direction requiring disclosure or certification of AI use in filings was located.

Duty to verify AI output

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. No duty to verify AI-generated citations is imposed by any Egyptian court, the Ministry of Justice or the Egyptian Bar Association.

Client data in AI tools

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. The Egyptian Bar Association has published no restriction on entering client data into AI tools.

Technological competence

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. Egypt's Advocacy Law and Bar rules do not name technology or AI competence.

Supervision of AI work

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Billing for AI work

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Consumer AI legal services

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. Consumer AI legal services operate in Egypt without any published regulatory position from the Bar or the Ministry of Justice.

Sanctions for AI misuse

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. No Egyptian decision sanctioning a lawyer for fabricated AI citations was located in Arabic or English sources.

Arbitration and ADR

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. CRCICA's Arbitration Rules in force since January 2024 contain no AI-specific provision and CRCICA has issued no AI guidance note.

Mandatory AI training

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No mandatory requirement as of 4 September 2026. Training is voluntary: Egyptian Bar Association / MCIT generative-AI workshops for lawyers since October 2025, and a UNESCO-Public Prosecution course for judges and prosecutors in March 2026, after which the Public Prosecution said it would fold AI training into national programmes.

Vendor due diligence

Nothing found

verified 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026. No legal-sector AI procurement or vendor due-diligence requirement was located.

Official documents recorded for Egypt (3)

Court incidents on the record in Egypt

all incidents →

Cite this page

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Egypt" (updated 2026-09-04, verified 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/eg (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.