Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Colorado Rule Change 2026(02): AI amendments to the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct
Colorado Supreme Court · Colorado
last revised 2026-01-08last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Court ruleIn forceCompetenceSupervisionConfidentiality
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AITechnological competenceClient data in AI toolsBilling for AI workSupervision of AI workDuty to verify AI output
Colorado became the first US jurisdiction to amend its lawyer ethics rules specifically for AI. Scope [20A] confirms technology does not diminish a lawyer's responsibilities and that misuse is disciplinable; Comment [9] to Rule 1.1 enumerates the rules AI implicates and preserves the duty of independent judgment.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- 08 Jan 2026
- Current version
- Rule Change 2026(02) · 08 Jan 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Scope [20A]: technology including artificial intelligence does not diminish a lawyer's responsibilities under the Rules, and a lawyer who uses technology directly or indirectly may be disciplined for a resulting violation
- Comment [8] to Rule 1.1: lawyers must keep abreast of the benefits and risks associated with relevant technology
- Comment [9] to Rule 1.1: AI use can implicate Rules 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 3.1, 3.3, 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 7.1 and 8.4(g)
- Comment [9]: reliance on technology does not diminish the lawyer's duty to exercise independent judgment
- Adopted en banc 8 January 2026, effective immediately
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rule Change 2026(02)current | 2026-01-08 | Amended and adopted en banc, effective immediately | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Colorado Rule Change 2026(02): AI amendments to the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct" (Colorado Supreme Court, Rule Change 2026(02), 2026-01-08), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-co-rule-change-2026-02-ai-rpc-amendments (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court