Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR Proceedings
United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review
last revised 2025-08-08last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
PolicyIn forcePermissiveVerification dutyCompetence
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIDisclosure of AI use in filingsSanctions for AI misuseDuty to verify AI outputJudges' use of AI
Signed by Acting Director Sirce E. Owen and effective 8 August 2025, this is the first Department of Justice component policy on generative AI binding practitioners. EOIR imposes neither a blanket prohibition nor mandatory disclosure, but treats hallucinated or erroneous AI content as a likely professional-conduct violation and directs adjudicators to refer suspected misuse for discipline.
- Applies to
- lawyers, judges, litigants, court-staff
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 08 Aug 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1410621/dl?inline=
What the document requires
- EOIR has no blanket prohibition on generative AI and no mandatory disclosure requirement in its proceedings.
- Individual immigration judges, courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals may adopt standing orders or local operating procedures on AI use and disclosure.
- Practitioners filing hallucinated or erroneous AI-generated content likely violate professional conduct obligations and may be disciplined under 8 C.F.R. 1003.102(c) for knowingly or recklessly offering false evidence.
- Adjudicators who suspect improper AI use should refer the matter to EOIR's Attorney Discipline Program and, as appropriate, its Anti-Fraud Program.
- Improper use of generative AI by an EOIR adjudicator may result in corrective or disciplinary action; unauthorised AI services on DOJ government-furnished equipment are prohibited.
- Cites OCAHO's guidance established by adjudication in United States v. Wallcon, LLC, 21 OCAHO no. 1630 (2025), and OMB Memorandum M-25-21.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-08-08 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR Proceedings" (United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Original, 2025-08-08), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-eoir-pm-25-40-generative-ai (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Machine-Generated Evidence · US Judicial Conference
- Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger) · M.D. Fla. (Berger)
- Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham) · S.D. Ohio (Graham)
- Interim guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the federal judiciary · AO of the US Courts
- ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools · ABA
- Proposed amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 (generative AI certification) · Fifth Circuit