Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Michelle Williams Court · California
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
Standing orderIn forceDisclosureCertification
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Judge Michelle Williams Court’s Central District of California civil standing order requires every motion, pleading, or paper to include a declaration about AI use or non-use. If AI drafted any portion, the filer must verify the content, identify AI-generated portions, and faces sanctions or striking for noncompliance.
- Applies to
- all
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Every motion, pleading, or other paper must attach a declaration disclosing AI use or non-use.
- The filer must certify either no AI drafting or that AI-drafted portions were reviewed and verified.
- The declaration must identify which portions of the filing incorporate generative AI outputs.
- Inaccurate or undeclared AI outputs may lead to sanctions, including State Bar referral.
- Failure to submit the declaration may result in striking the filing.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases" (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California — Judge Michelle Williams Court, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cacd-court-2026-ai-use-nonuse-declaration (accessed 2026-09-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Park)