Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forcePermissive
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filingsSelf-represented litigants
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
After public comment, the Fifth Circuit decided not to adopt its proposed AI certification rule. The notice leaves no special AI disclosure or certification requirement in effect, but expressly warns parties and counsel that existing appellate duties require careful checking for truthfulness and accuracy.
- Applies to
- lawyers, litigants
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The court declined to adopt a special AI rule for drafting briefs.
- Parties and counsel remain responsible for truthfulness and accuracy under existing appellate rules.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence" (U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-ca5-court-2024-decision-not-to-adopt-ai-rule (accessed 2026-09-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Park)