Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California · California
last revised 2026-09-06last verified 2026-09-061 versioncountry page →
country page →GuidanceIn forceCompetence
map categories:Disclosure of AI use in filings
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Central District of California Bankruptcy Court’s AI tools notice warns filers that AI-generated court documents may contain fabricated citations, misstatements, or unsupported facts. It advises line-by-line review and verification before filing, and warns that inaccurate or fabricated content may produce sanctions or denial of relief.
- Applies to
- all
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- As posted (undated) · 06 Sept 2026
- Last verified
- 06 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- The notice warns that AI tools may generate inaccurate, outdated, inapplicable, or fabricated legal content.
- It says filers should conduct careful line-by-line review before filing AI-assisted documents.
- Filers should confirm every cited case, statute, rule, and quotation exists and is accurately quoted.
- Inaccurate citations or unsupported factual assertions may lead to sanctions or denial of relief.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| As posted (undated)current | 2026-09-06 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court" (U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, As posted (undated), 2026-09-06), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/us-cacb-court-2026-ai-tools-risks (accessed 2026-09-16). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Park)