Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools
American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility
last revised 2024-07-29last verified 2026-09-031 versioncountry page →
Ethics opinionIn forceCompetenceConfidentialityClient consentVerification dutySupervision
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AITechnological competenceClient data in AI toolsClient consent and transparencyDuty to verify AI outputSupervision of AI workBilling for AI workVendor due diligence
The American Bar Association's first formal ethics opinion on generative AI, issued 29 July 2024, applies the Model Rules to lawyers across the United States. It covers competence, confidentiality with informed client consent for self-learning tools, candor to tribunals, supervision of staff and vendors, and fees. It is permissive with cautions and has no successor opinion.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- 29 Jul 2024
- Current version
- Original · 29 Jul 2024
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Lawyers must understand the benefits and risks of the generative AI tools they use (Rule 1.1).
- Informed client consent is required before entering confidential information into a self-learning tool (Rule 1.6).
- Output must be verified before it is relied on or filed (Rules 1.1, 3.3).
- Managerial and supervisory lawyers must establish policies for AI use by staff (Rules 5.1, 5.3).
- Lawyers may not bill clients for time saved by AI or for learning to use a tool (Rule 1.5).
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-07-29 | First version recorded. | official |
Related court incidents on the record
- Park v. Kim, 91 F.4th 610 (2d Cir. 2024)2024-01-30 Regulatory referral
- Mata v Avianca, Inc.2023-06-22 Sanctions
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools" (American Bar Association Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Original, 2024-07-29), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/aba-formal-opinion-512 (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)