UruguayNo rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Regulation Tracker · Country · Americas
Uruguay
Checked: no rules foundcivil lawupdated 2026-09-04verified 2026-09-04
As of 4 September 2026 Uruguay has no rule, guidance or reported case on AI in legal practice. Ley 20.212 of 2023 tasks the e-government agency with a national data and AI strategy, and the country adhered to UNESCO and OECD AI recommendations, but the Supreme Court has issued nothing and the judiciary reported no AI applications.
As of 2026-09-04, Uruguay has 0 binding rules, official guidance in 0 categories, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. In 19 categories we found nothing; in 1 the position is not yet determined.
How to read this page
- Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
- Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
- Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
- Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
- Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
- Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.
The rules, category by category
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No Supreme Court acordada on AI was identified in the national report to the XXVIII Ibero-American Procedural Law Conference of April 2025. No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No generative-AI guidance from the Uruguayan Bar Association found as of 4 September 2026.
The judiciary reported no AI applications beyond its case-management systems as of April 2025, and no policy was found as of 4 September 2026.
No AI statute. Ley 20.212 of 6 November 2023, article 74, mandates the e-government agency to design a national data and AI strategy, and a 2020 AI strategy for digital government exists. No bill classifying legal uses was found as of 4 September 2026.
No reported sanction for AI-hallucinated content found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.
Ley 18.331 applies; whether the data-protection regulator has issued AI-specific guidance could not be checked against official sources in this research window.
Official documents recorded for Uruguay (0)
- No documents recorded yet; category sources link the official pages.
Court incidents on the record in Uruguay
- Yichang District Court (Hubei)2026-07-21 Warning
Cite this page
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Uruguay" (updated 2026-09-04, verified 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/uy (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.