Skip to content

Regulation Tracker · Country · Europe

Bulgaria

Developingcivil lawupdated 2026-09-04researched 2026-09-04provisional

EU-level rules also apply — see the European Union record →

As of 4 September 2026 Bulgaria has no Supreme Bar Council, Supreme Judicial Council or CPDP guidance located on AI in legal practice. The EU AI Act applies directly, including Annex III justice classifications; Bulgarian national implementation remains unfinished, with BTA reporting only fundamental-rights bodies designated and high-risk oversight still pending.

As of 2026-09-04, Bulgaria has 3 binding rules, official guidance in 0 categories, 0 proposals and 0 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. Binding rules cover technological competence, horizontal AI statute, mandatory AI training. In 17 categories we found nothing; in 0 the position is not yet determined.

How to read this page
  • Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
  • Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
  • Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
  • Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
  • Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
  • Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.

The rules, category by category

Horizontal AI statute

Binding rule

researched 2026-09-04

The EU AI Act applies directly in Bulgaria, including Annex III point 8 justice uses. National implementation is incomplete: BTA reported only fundamental-rights bodies designated and high-risk oversight, sanctions and coordination still pending.

Duty to verify AI output

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Judges' use of AI

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

AI-generated evidence

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Client data in AI tools

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Supervision of AI work

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Billing for AI work

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Courts' own AI deployment

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No Supreme Judicial Council AI policy was found. The council publishes e-justice and case-processing updates, but no court AI deployment rule or guidance was located.

Data protection and legal AI

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

CPDP was checked as Bulgaria's data-protection authority. No AI-specific CPDP guidance for legal services or lawyers was located; GDPR and national data-protection rules apply generally.

Sanctions for AI misuse

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Arbitration and ADR

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Vendor due diligence

Nothing found

researched 2026-09-04

No rule, guidance or reported case found as of 4 September 2026.

Official documents recorded for Bulgaria (0)

  • No documents recorded yet; category sources link the official pages.

Court incidents on the record in Bulgaria

all incidents →

Cite this page

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Bulgaria" (updated 2026-09-04, AI-researched, provisional 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/bg (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.