AI guide for advocates [Tehisaru juhend advokaatidele]
Estonian Bar Association [Eesti Advokatuur], intellectual property and IT law commission
last revised 2024-12-03last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityCompetence
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsTechnological competenceSupervision of AI workBar guidance on generative AIVendor due diligence
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
The Estonian Bar Association's guide on artificial intelligence for advocates, published on 3 December 2024. It is addressed to advocates and law-office staff and sets out verification, competence and confidentiality expectations on the founding principle that the advocate, never the AI system, provides the legal service.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- 1.0 · 03 Dec 2024
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- 'The attorney always provides legal services, not artificial intelligence' — AI output must be critically evaluated, its accuracy verified and its errors corrected by the advocate.
- Advocates must maintain their own expertise and independent judgment rather than letting AI replace professional skill or erode critical thinking.
- Sensitive client information should be entered only into systems whose security has been verified.
- The guide warns against free public AI services, which may use entered information for product development or share it unexpectedly.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0current | 2024-12-03 | Published 3 December 2024, prepared by the Bar's intellectual property and IT law commission, to help advocates and law-office staff use AI effectively and responsibly. Only the Bar's official announcement is public; the guide text was not read, so this record is unverified. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "AI guide for advocates [Tehisaru juhend advokaatidele]" (Estonian Bar Association [Eesti Advokatuur], intellectual property and IT law commission, 1.0, 2024-12-03), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/ee-advokatuur-tehisaru-juhend (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI