Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the USPTO
United States Patent and Trademark Office
last revised 2024-04-11last verified 2026-09-031 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityCompetence
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsTechnological competenceBar guidance on generative AI
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Guidance published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on 11 April 2024 reminding practitioners that existing signature, candor and confidentiality duties apply when AI tools are used to prepare filings. Practitioners must review AI-assisted documents before submission, must not disclose client information to tools without safeguards, and remain responsible for accuracy.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- 11 Apr 2024
- Current version
- Federal Register notice (89 FR 25609) · 11 Apr 2024
- Last verified
- 03 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Signature requirements under 37 CFR 11.18 apply to AI-drafted submissions; the signer certifies reasonable inquiry.
- Duty of candor and good faith extends to AI-assisted prior-art searches and responses.
- Confidential client and export-controlled information must not be entered into tools that may disclose it.
- No duty to disclose AI use unless specifically required or material to patentability.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Register notice (89 FR 25609)current | 2024-04-11 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the USPTO" (United States Patent and Trademark Office, Federal Register notice (89 FR 25609), 2024-04-11), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/uspto-ai-tools-practice-guidance (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Proposed Federal Rule of Evidence 707: Machine-Generated Evidence · US Judicial Conference
- Standing Order on Artificial Intelligence (Judge Wendy W. Berger) · M.D. Fla. (Berger)
- Standing Order on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Judge James L. Graham) · S.D. Ohio (Graham)
- Policy Memorandum 25-40: Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in EOIR Proceedings · DOJ EOIR
- Interim guidance on the use of artificial intelligence in the federal judiciary · AO of the US Courts
- ABA Formal Opinion 512: Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools · ABA