Regulation Tracker / United States (federal)
Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the USPTO
United States Patent and Trademark Office
last revised 2024-04-11last verified 2026-09-221 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityCompetence
map categories:Duty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsTechnological competenceBar guidance on generative AI
Guidance published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on 11 April 2024 reminding practitioners that existing signature, candor and confidentiality duties apply when AI tools are used to prepare filings. Practitioners must review AI-assisted documents before submission, must not disclose client information to tools without safeguards, and remain responsible for accuracy.
- Applies to
- lawyers, parties
- Effective
- 11 Apr 2024
- Current version
- Federal Register notice (89 FR 25609) · 11 Apr 2024
- Last verified
- 22 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Signature requirements under 37 CFR 11.18 apply to AI-drafted submissions; the signer certifies reasonable inquiry.
- Duty of candor and good faith extends to AI-assisted prior-art searches and responses.
- Confidential client and export-controlled information must not be entered into tools that may disclose it.
- No duty to disclose AI use unless specifically required or material to patentability.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Register notice (89 FR 25609)current | 2024-04-11 | First version recorded. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidance on Use of Artificial Intelligence-Based Tools in Practice Before the USPTO" (United States Patent and Trademark Office, Federal Register notice (89 FR 25609), 2024-04-11), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-federal/uspto-ai-tools-practice-guidance (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (federal)
- Notice of Proposed Amendment to Fifth Circuit Rule 32.3 and Form 6 · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Court Decision on Proposed Rule Regarding Artificial Intelligence · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Risks Associated with the Use of AI Tools to Generate Documents for Filing with the Court · Central District of California
- Standing Order Regarding Newly Assigned Cases · Central District of California (Judge Court)
- Civil Standing Order · Central District of California (Judge Kato)
- Judge’s Procedures: Artificial Intelligence · Central District of California (Judge Oliver)