Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
In re Amendments to the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct (AI amendments), 2025 Ark. 115
Supreme Court of Arkansas · Arkansas
last revised 2025-06-05last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →Court ruleIn forceSupervisionVerification duty
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AISupervision of AI workDuty to verify AI output
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Arkansas wrote AI supervision into its conduct rules rather than issuing a bar opinion. Amended Rule 5.3 makes the supervising attorney fully responsible for AI-generated work product, and the amended Preamble confirms AI use remains subject to all existing rules.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- 2025 Ark. 115 · 05 Jun 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- arcourts.gov/
What the document requires
- Amended Rule 5.3 (Nonlawyer Assistance) makes the supervising attorney personally and fully responsible for AI-generated work product
- The amended Preamble confirms generative AI is not prohibited but its use remains fully subject to all existing rules
- Adopted in place of a numbered Arkansas Bar Association ethics opinion
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Ark. 115current | 2025-06-05 | Amendments to Rule 5.3 and the Preamble | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "In re Amendments to the Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct (AI amendments), 2025 Ark. 115" (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2025 Ark. 115, 2025-06-05), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-ar-rpc-ai-amendments-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court