Bar Council of India circular on digital and social-media conduct and professional responsibility of advocates
Bar Council of India
last revised 2026-07-17last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
RegulationIn forceDisclosureProhibition
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIAI-generated evidenceDisclosure of AI use in filings
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Bar Council of India circular of 17 July 2026 on advocates', law students' and interns' online conduct. Advocates publishing legal-awareness content must add disclaimers and accurately disclose any use of generative-AI tools; fabricated judgments, fake citations, AI-generated non-existent case law and deepfake courtroom content are prohibited, with disciplinary referral or contempt where warranted.
- Applies to
- lawyers
- Effective
- 17 Jul 2026
- Current version
- Original (reported as BCI/D/4659/2026) · 17 Jul 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Accurate disclosure of generative-AI use in online legal content.
- Prohibition on fabricated judgments, fake citations, unverified screenshots and AI-generated non-existent case law.
- Prohibition on deepfakes, voice cloning and synthetic content involving judges, lawyers or litigants.
- Violations may lead to disciplinary action, referral to State Bar Councils or contempt proceedings.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Original (reported as BCI/D/4659/2026)current | 2026-07-17 | Original circular; official PDF not located on barcouncilofindia.org. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Bar Council of India circular on digital and social-media conduct and professional responsibility of advocates" (Bar Council of India, Original (reported as BCI/D/4659/2026), 2026-07-17), safelegalai.com/regulation/india/in-bci-digital-conduct-circular-2026 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in India
- Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v Union of India, 2026 INSC 947 · Supreme Court of India
- Pooja Ramesh Singh v Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd, 2026 INSC 668 · Supreme Court of India
- Draft Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Courts, 2026 · Supreme Court of India
- Directive prohibiting judicial officers from using AI tools for judgments and legal research · Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial and Court Administration · Gujarat High Court
- India AI Governance Guidelines · MeitY