Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial and Court Administration
High Court of Gujarat · Gujarat
last revised 2026-04-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
PolicyIn forceProhibitionVerification dutyConfidentiality
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding casesDuty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsCourts' own AI deploymentVendor due diligenceMandatory AI training
Gujarat High Court policy of April 2026 for the district judiciary, issued under Articles 227 and 235. AI is permitted solely as a neutral administrative and research instrument through High Court-defined tools; it may not be used for decision-making, reasoning, drafting substantive orders, bail or sentencing; AI citations and summaries must be independently verified.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- 01 Apr 2026
- Current version
- Original · 01 Apr 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- AI shall not be used for decision-making, reasoning, drafting of substantive orders, judgment preparation, bail, sentencing or any substantive judicial process (cl. 3.1, 8).
- Permitted: research and precedent identification, translation, administrative support and language refinement of drafts (cl. 7).
- Independent verification of AI-generated citations, statutory references and summaries (cl. 10).
- Public AI tools restricted; sensitive case material must not be uploaded (cl. 9.2-9.3); only High Court-approved tools.
- To be read with the IT Act, the DPDP Act 2023 when in force, the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 and the Gujarat High Court Rules 1993.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2026-04-01 | Original policy; PDF metadata date, published April 2026. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial and Court Administration" (High Court of Gujarat, Original, 2026-04-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/india/in-gujarat-hc-ai-policy-judicial-court-administration (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in India
- Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya v Union of India, 2026 INSC 947 · Supreme Court of India
- Bar Council of India circular on digital and social-media conduct and professional responsibility of advocates · BCI
- Pooja Ramesh Singh v Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd, 2026 INSC 668 · Supreme Court of India
- Draft Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence in Courts, 2026 · Supreme Court of India
- Directive prohibiting judicial officers from using AI tools for judgments and legal research · Punjab and Haryana High Court
- India AI Governance Guidelines · MeitY