Veiledning for bruk av kunstig intelligens i advokatvirksomhet
Norwegian Bar Association [Advokatforeningen]
last revised 2025-09-05last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityCompetencePermissive
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIDuty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsSupervision of AI work
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Guidance produced by the Norwegian Bar Association's professional ethics committee and approved by its board on 5 September 2025, on using AI in legal practice. It is issued under the Association's ethics recommendations and holds that the lawyer always carries final responsibility even where AI is used as a tool.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Approved by the board · 05 Sept 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Issued under Advokatforeningen's professional-ethics recommendations for lawyers and law firms.
- The lawyer retains final responsibility for AI-assisted work.
- Full text is behind a member login; substantive provisions could not be verified from public sources.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Approved by the boardcurrent | 2025-09-05 | Prepared by the Association's professional ethics committee and approved by the board on 5 September 2025; full text is members-only. Full text is members-only and was not read, so this record is unverified. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Veiledning for bruk av kunstig intelligens i advokatvirksomhet" (Norwegian Bar Association [Advokatforeningen], Approved by the board, 2025-09-05), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/no-advokatforeningen-ai-guidance (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI