Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
ARDC: Implementing Generative AI for Illinois Attorneys
Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission · Illinois
last revised 2025-10-24last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceCompetenceConfidentialityVerification dutySupervisionClient consent
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIClient data in AI toolsTechnological competenceDuty to verify AI outputSupervision of AI workClient consent and transparency
The Illinois ARDC's practical companion to the Supreme Court's AI Policy. It is expressly nonbinding and subordinate to the Policy, and supplies an explanation of generative AI, a tool-selection and documentation framework, and a Practice Resource Kit with sample notices, firm policies, a client consent form and a terms-of-use checklist.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 24 Oct 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- iardc.org/Files/Implementing-AI-Guide/?page=1
What the document requires
- Nonbinding companion to the Illinois Supreme Court Policy on Artificial Intelligence; the Policy controls in the event of inconsistency
- Explains how modern generative AI works and why that matters for confidentiality and security
- Provides a framework to choose and document appropriate AI tools
- Practice Resource Kit: sample client notices, firm AI policies, client consent form and terms-of-use checklist
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-10-24 | Initial publication | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "ARDC: Implementing Generative AI for Illinois Attorneys" (Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, Original, 2025-10-24), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-il-ardc-implementing-generative-ai-guide (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court