Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Arizona Steering Committee on AI and the Courts: Generative AI — Ethical Best Practices for Lawyers and Judges
Arizona Steering Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts · Arizona
last revised 2024-11-14last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceVerification dutyCompetenceConfidentialityDisclosure
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIJudges' use of AIBilling for AI workClient data in AI toolsDuty to verify AI outputTechnological competenceClient consent and transparency
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Supreme Court-sponsored, non-binding Arizona guidance on generative AI for lawyers and judges. It requires users to understand the technology, check all output for accuracy rather than deferring to AI judgment, avoid entering confidential information when in doubt, refrain from billing time saved by AI, and tell prospective clients when they are dealing with an AI intake program.
- Applies to
- lawyers, judges
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 14 Nov 2024
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- A lawyer must understand the benefits and risks of using generative AI
- A lawyer must check all work product for accuracy and must not defer to the judgment of generative AI
- When in doubt, do not enter confidential or non-public information into a generative AI tool
- A lawyer billing hourly may not bill clients for time saved by using AI
- Where AI is used for client intake, prospective clients must be told they are communicating with an AI program
- Client disclosure is required where the client would need to know about the AI use to make an informed decision
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2024-11-14 | Issued pursuant to Administrative Order 2024-33 | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Arizona Steering Committee on AI and the Courts: Generative AI — Ethical Best Practices for Lawyers and Judges" (Arizona Steering Committee on Artificial Intelligence and the Courts, Original, 2024-11-14), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-az-aisc-generative-ai-best-practices (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court