MexicoNo AI statute is in force. A Senate draft General Law to Regulate and Promote AI was not put to a vote before the ordinary period closed in April 2026; a National Law to Regulate the Use of AI was introduced on 11 February 2026 and a Federal Law for the Ethical, Sovereign and Inclusive Development of AI in the Chamber of Deputies on 24 July 2026. None classifies justice-sector uses.
Regulation Tracker · Country · Americas
Mexico
Early: one or two positionscivil lawupdated 2026-09-04verified 2026-09-04
As of 4 September 2026 Mexico has no AI statute, no federal judicial AI framework and no bar guidance on legal AI. The only judicial position comes from federal collegiate-court criteria published on 22 August 2025, holding that AI is an auxiliary tool and that deliberation and decision must remain with the judge.
As of 2026-09-04, Mexico has 0 binding rules, official guidance in 0 categories, 1 proposal and 2 positions set only by case law across the 20 categories in the map. In 15 categories we found nothing; in 2 the position is not yet determined.
How to read this page
- Binding rule Binding rule means a rule in force from a court, statute, regulator or equivalent authority.
- Official guidance Official guidance means an official non-binding position from a judiciary, regulator, bar or public body.
- Proposed / consultation Proposed / consultation means a public bill, draft rule or consultation that is not yet in force.
- Set by case law Set by case law means no rule was found, but courts have set the position in decisions.
- Nothing found Nothing found means the category was checked and no rule, guidance, proposal or case-law position was found.
- Not yet determined Not yet determined means research did not establish a reliable position yet.
The rules, category by category
Criteria of the Second Collegiate Court in Civil Matters of the Second Circuit, published in the Semanario Judicial de la Federación on 22 August 2025, accept AI as a support tool in adjudication subject to self-restraint, proportionality and non-harm, data protection, transparency and explainability, and human judicial supervision. No SCJN or Órgano de Administración Judicial guidelines exist.
The same August 2025 criteria hold that technology operates as an auxiliary and not as a substitute, and that deliberation and the final decision remain strictly within the jurisdictional sphere of the judge or magistrate. There is no statutory or regulatory prohibition.
No rule, guidance or reported case requiring disclosure or certification of AI use in Mexican court filings found as of 4 September 2026, at federal level or in the state judiciaries examined.
No express duty to verify AI output before filing has been imposed on parties or counsel. The 2025 collegiate-court criteria impose human supervision on judges, not a filing-verification duty on litigants.
No court guidance for self-represented litigants using AI found as of 4 September 2026.
No rule or guidance on authentication or admissibility of AI-generated or deepfake evidence found as of 4 September 2026.
No professional-conduct guidance on client data in AI tools. Mexico has no compulsory bar; the legal profession is licensed through the Dirección General de Profesiones and bar codes of ethics bind only voluntary members, so no regulator has issued binding AI confidentiality rules.
No technological-competence rule naming AI found in Mexican professional regulation as of 4 September 2026.
No rule or guidance on supervision of AI-assisted legal work found as of 4 September 2026.
No requirement to inform clients of, or obtain consent for, AI use found as of 4 September 2026.
No guidance on billing for AI-assisted work found as of 4 September 2026.
No ruling or regulation on consumer AI legal services found as of 4 September 2026. Because legal practice is licensed by professional title rather than by a mandatory bar, there is no regulator with a standing unauthorised-practice enforcement function comparable to a common-law bar.
No generative-AI guidance from the Barra Mexicana, Colegio de Abogados or any other Mexican bar association found as of 4 September 2026; the Barra offers a paid diploma course on generative AI ethics for lawyers but has published no guidance document.
No data-protection authority guidance addressed to AI in legal services found as of 4 September 2026. General personal-data legislation applies; supervision was reorganised after the 2024-2025 constitutional reform abolished INAI.
No Mexican arbitral or mediation institution rule or guideline on AI found as of 4 September 2026.
Mexico has no mandatory continuing legal education, so there is no mandatory AI training requirement.
No rule or guidance on due diligence for legal AI procurement found as of 4 September 2026.
The SCJN operates a public virtual assistant, JusticIA, over its own published materials, and individual federal and state judges have deployed AI in case preparation, but no published institutional AI policy was located; official SCJN and CJF sources could not be opened during this pass.
No reported Mexican decision sanctioning fabricated AI citations was located, but search coverage of Mexican case law was limited in this pass; treat as not established rather than absent.
Official documents recorded for Mexico (1)
- Federal collegiate court criteria on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial decision-making
Mexican federal collegiate court · revised 2025-08-22 · verified 2026-09-04
Court incidents on the record in Mexico
- Yichang District Court (Hubei)2026-07-21 Warning
Cite this page
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Mexico" (updated 2026-09-04, verified 2026-09-04), https://safelegalai.com/regulation/country/mx (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
SafeLegalAI is a research publication by Cognesio LLP, not a law firm. Nothing here is legal advice, and no lawyer–client relationship arises from reading it. Rules change; always check the official document linked on each record and take advice on your own situation. Researched and drafted with AI assistance; verified against primary sources and edited by Cognesio LLP. The linked official documents are the record — our summaries are not the law and are not legal advice.
- El Mundo del Derecho — SCJN criteria on ethical AI use in judicial proceedings (22 Aug 2025 Semanario publication)
- Foro Jurídico — Nueva judicatura e Inteligencia Artificial (11 Feb 2025: no Mexican judicial AI framework exists)
- Infobae — Senate AI regulation initiative (30 Apr 2026)
- Barra Mexicana, Colegio de Abogados