Federal collegiate court criteria on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial decision-making
Second Collegiate Court in Civil Matters of the Second Circuit [Segundo Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Segundo Circuito]
last revised 2025-08-22last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
Judgment (guidance)In forceSupervisionVerification dutyProhibition
map categories:Judges' use of AIAI barred from deciding cases
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Criteria published in Mexico's Semanario Judicial de la Federacion on 22 August 2025 holding that AI may assist a judge only as an auxiliary tool, under an exercise of self-restraint and with respect for human rights, and that deliberation and the final decision remain strictly within the jurisdictional sphere.
- Applies to
- judges, court-staff
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Published in the Semanario Judicial de la Federación · 22 Aug 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Technology operates as an auxiliary and not as a substitute; deliberation and decision remain in the strictly jurisdictional sphere.
- The final decision in a judicial process must rest exclusively with judges and magistrates.
- Reported guiding principles: proportionality and non-harm, protection of personal data, transparency and explainability, and human judicial supervision.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Published in the Semanario Judicial de la Federacióncurrent | 2025-08-22 | Source is legal press only; the criteria were not verified against the official Semanario Judicial de la Federacion text, so this record is unverified. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Federal collegiate court criteria on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial decision-making" (Second Collegiate Court in Civil Matters of the Second Circuit [Segundo Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Segundo Circuito], Published in the Semanario Judicial de la Federación, 2025-08-22), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/mx-collegiate-court-ai-judicial-criteria-2025 (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI