Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Minnesota State Bar Association AI Working Group: Final Report and Recommendations
Minnesota State Bar Association, Artificial Intelligence Working Group · Minnesota
last revised 2024-07-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →ReportIn forceCompetenceConfidentialityVerification duty
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AITechnological competenceClient data in AI tools
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Minnesota's bar produced a working-group report rather than an ethics opinion. It recommends an AI regulatory sandbox for access-to-justice LLM tools and sets out guidance on lawyer use of generative AI under the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. Text not verified in this run.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms, providers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Final Report and Recommendations · 01 Jul 2024
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Recommends an AI regulatory sandbox for access-to-justice large language model tools
- Provides guidance on lawyer use of generative AI under the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct
- Bar association report, not an ethics opinion; the LPRB has issued no numbered AI opinion
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final Report and Recommendationscurrent | 2024-07-01 | Adopted June/July 2024; the source gives a month only (adopted June/July 2024), so the day is recorded as the 1st | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Minnesota State Bar Association AI Working Group: Final Report and Recommendations" (Minnesota State Bar Association, Artificial Intelligence Working Group, Final Report and Recommendations, 2024-07-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-mn-msba-ai-working-group-report (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)