Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / United States (state)

Minnesota State Bar Association AI Working Group: Final Report and Recommendations

Minnesota State Bar Association, Artificial Intelligence Working Group · Minnesota

last revised 2024-07-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

ReportIn forceCompetenceConfidentialityVerification duty

map categories:Bar guidance on generative AITechnological competenceClient data in AI tools

Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.

Minnesota's bar produced a working-group report rather than an ethics opinion. It recommends an AI regulatory sandbox for access-to-justice LLM tools and sets out guidance on lawyer use of generative AI under the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct. Text not verified in this run.

Applies to
lawyers, firms, providers
Effective
See version history
Current version
Final Report and Recommendations · 01 Jul 2024
Last verified
04 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • Recommends an AI regulatory sandbox for access-to-justice large language model tools
  • Provides guidance on lawyer use of generative AI under the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct
  • Bar association report, not an ethics opinion; the LPRB has issued no numbered AI opinion

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
Final Report and Recommendationscurrent2024-07-01Adopted June/July 2024; the source gives a month only (adopted June/July 2024), so the day is recorded as the 1stofficial

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Minnesota State Bar Association AI Working Group: Final Report and Recommendations" (Minnesota State Bar Association, Artificial Intelligence Working Group, Final Report and Recommendations, 2024-07-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-mn-msba-ai-working-group-report (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in United States (state)