To nye AI-vejledninger til advokatbranchen (AI Act guidance and AI procurement guidance)
Danske Advokater
last revised 2024-12-17last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
GuidanceIn forceConfidentialityCompetencePermissive
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIVendor due diligenceClient data in AI toolsTechnological competence
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Two guides published on 17 December 2024 by Danske Advokater, the Danish legal-sector trade association. The first explains the EU AI Act's significance for law firms, including risk categories and provider versus deployer roles. The second is a practical checklist of considerations before buying and deploying AI in a firm.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Two guidance documents published · 17 Dec 2024
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Guide 1 maps the AI Act's definitions, risk categories and obligations onto law-firm scenarios.
- Guide 2 covers confidentiality, IP rights, GDPR, ESG considerations and the rules of professional conduct when procuring AI.
- Both are available only in the members' area of the Danske Advokater website.
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Two guidance documents publishedcurrent | 2024-12-17 | Published to members on 17 December 2024; full texts are behind the members-only area. Full texts sit behind the members-only area and were not read, so this record is unverified. | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "To nye AI-vejledninger til advokatbranchen (AI Act guidance and AI procurement guidance)" (Danske Advokater, Two guidance documents published, 2024-12-17), safelegalai.com/regulation/other/dk-danske-advokater-ai-guides (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in Other
- Letter No. 112/WKMA.Y/HK2.1/IX/2026: draft judgment-writing guidance and templates for the new Criminal Codes · Mahkamah Agung
- AI in the advocate's practice: opportunities, tools and safe use [DI advokato praktikoje: galimybės, įrankiai ir saugus naudojimas] · Lietuvos advokatūra
- Supreme Court of Japan generative-AI demonstration for civil trials (FY2027 budget request) · Supreme Court of Japan
- Recommendation Guide on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers [Avukatlar İçin Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı Tavsiye Rehberi] · Türkiye Barolar Birliği (TBB)
- Decision No. 1671/QD-TTg approving the National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence to 2030, vision to 2045 · Prime Minister of Vietnam
- Guideline on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Indonesian Advocates [Pedoman Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan] · PERADI