Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
State Bar of Michigan AI Workgroup: Transforming the Legal Profession in the Age of AI
State Bar of Michigan, Board of Commissioners AI Workgroup · Michigan
last revised 2025-06-11last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →ReportIn forceCompetence
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AITechnological competenceConsumer AI legal services
Unverified: we have not yet opened the official document at the linked address. The record is listed for completeness and excluded from search indexes until confirmed.
Michigan's bar-level strategic report on AI, released 11 June 2025. It reaffirms MRPC 1.1 competence as the operative standard, examines AI and the unauthorised practice of law under MCL 600.916, and makes six institutional recommendations on member education, staff development and standing committee oversight. It is a living document, not an ethics opinion.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms, providers
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- Original · 11 Jun 2025
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
What the document requires
- Living document, not a binding ethics opinion
- Reaffirms MRPC 1.1 as the operative competence standard for AI use
- Addresses AI's impact on unauthorised practice of law under MCL 600.916
- Six institutional recommendations covering member education, staff development and standing committee oversight
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originalcurrent | 2025-06-11 | Released by the Board of Commissioners AI Workgroup | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "State Bar of Michigan AI Workgroup: Transforming the Legal Profession in the Age of AI" (State Bar of Michigan, Board of Commissioners AI Workgroup, Original, 2025-06-11), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-mi-age-of-ai-report (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- Connecticut Judicial Branch, Committee on Artificial Intelligence in the Connecticut Legal System: Final Report · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- Connecticut Practice Book Section 4-9: Generative Artificial Intelligence Compliance · Connecticut Judicial Branch
- In re Amendments to Article V, Rule 1.1 of the Supreme Court Rules (Professional Conduct) and Adoption of Interim Generative AI Guidelines · RI Supreme Court
- Ohio Ethics Guide: Artificial Intelligence for Lawyers and Judicial Officers · Ohio Board of Professional Conduct
- 22 NYCRR Part 161 — Use of Artificial Intelligence Technology · NY Unified Court System
- In re Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.515 (generative AI), SC2026-0673 · Florida Supreme Court