Skip to content

Regulation Tracker / Canada

Guidance on Professional Responsibility and Generative AI

Law Society of British Columbia · British Columbia

last revised 2023-11-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →

GuidanceIn forcePermissiveVerification dutyConfidentialityCompetence

map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIDuty to verify AI outputClient data in AI toolsTechnological competence

Guidance from the Law Society of British Columbia, issued November 2023, on how the Code of Professional Conduct applies when BC lawyers use generative AI. It is permissive with cautions, stressing that lawyers must verify output, keep client information confidential, remain competent in the technology, and understand that AI does not change their professional obligations.

Applies to
lawyers, firms
Effective
01 Nov 2023
Current version
November 2023 · 01 Nov 2023
Last verified
04 Sept 2026

What the document requires

  • Lawyers remain responsible for the accuracy of AI-assisted work, including citations.
  • Confidential client information should not be entered into public generative AI tools.
  • Competence includes understanding the limits and risks of the tools used.
  • Lawyers should consider whether to inform clients of AI use in their matter.

Version history

VersionDateWhat changedSource
November 2023current2023-11-01First version recorded.official · archive

Related court incidents on the record

Read our analysis: Canada's law-society AI guidance: BC, Ontario, Alberta, and the CBA →

Sources

Cite this record

SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Guidance on Professional Responsibility and Generative AI" (Law Society of British Columbia, November 2023, 2023-11-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/canada/lsbc-professional-responsibility-generative-ai (accessed 2026-09-04). Data: CC BY 4.0.

More official documents in Canada