Regulation Tracker / United States (state)
Alabama State Bar Formal Opinion 2026-01: Artificial Intelligence Use — Best Practices Under Existing Professional Conduct Rules
Alabama State Bar, Office of General Counsel · Alabama
last revised 2026-05-01last verified 2026-09-041 versioncountry page →
country page →Ethics opinionIn forceVerification dutyConfidentialityCompetenceSupervisionClient consent
map categories:Bar guidance on generative AIDisclosure of AI use in filingsBilling for AI workClient data in AI toolsDuty to verify AI outputTechnological competenceSupervision of AI work
The Alabama State Bar's first formal opinion on AI. It applies ARPC 1.1, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 3.1, 3.3, 5.1 and 5.3 to generative and agentic AI, requires independent verification of AI citations before filing, prefers enterprise or closed AI systems, bars billing for AI time savings, and supplies a compliance checklist.
- Applies to
- lawyers, firms
- Effective
- See version history
- Current version
- FO 2026-01 · 01 May 2026
- Last verified
- 04 Sept 2026
- Official text
- www.alabar.org/assets/2026/05/FO-2026-01.pdf
What the document requires
- Independently verify every legal citation generated by AI against an authoritative database before filing (ARPC 1.1, 3.1, 3.3)
- Input into most generative AI platforms is disclosure; prefer enterprise or closed systems, anonymise prompts, and obtain informed consent where risk cannot be eliminated (ARPC 1.6)
- No Alabama rule mandates disclosure of AI use to clients in all circumstances, but proactive communication is prudent (ARPC 1.4)
- A lawyer may bill only for time actually spent; review and judgment time is billable, time saved by AI is not (ARPC 1.5)
- AI is to be supervised like a nonlawyer assistant; the supervising lawyer remains fully responsible for the work product (ARPC 5.1, 5.3)
- Check each court's local rules and standing orders for AI disclosure or certification requirements before filing
Version history
| Version | Date | What changed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| FO 2026-01current | 2026-05-01 | Initial publication; the source gives a month only (published May 2026), so the day is recorded as the 1st | official |
Sources
Cite this record
SafeLegalAI Legal AI Regulation Tracker, "Alabama State Bar Formal Opinion 2026-01: Artificial Intelligence Use — Best Practices Under Existing Professional Conduct Rules" (Alabama State Bar, Office of General Counsel, FO 2026-01, 2026-05-01), safelegalai.com/regulation/us-state/us-al-state-bar-formal-opinion-2026-01 (accessed 2026-10-07). Data: CC BY 4.0.
More official documents in United States (state)
- California SB 574 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2026): generative AI duties for attorneys and arbitrators · California Legislature
- Standing Order – Jury Trials · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Cleary)
- Standing Order for Courtroom 2309 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division, Trial Section (Judge Golden)
- Standing Order, General Chancery Calendar 9 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (Judge Horan)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Seaton)
- Amended and Restated Standing Order, Calendar 60 · Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division, Mortgage Foreclosure/Mechanics Lien Section (Judge Sullivan)